Published December 22, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae)

Description

Kelly, Thomas S, Martin, Robert A, Ronez, Christophe, Cañón, Carola, Pardiñas, Ulyses F J (2023): Morphology and genetics of grasshopper mice revisited in a paleontological framework: reinstatement of Onychomyini (Rodentia, Cricetidae). Journal of Mammalogy 104 (1): 3-28, DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyac093, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyac093

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:B6225329FF8226726E7EFFAAC34A1B32

References

  • Abadi S., Azouri D., Pupko T., Mayrose, I. 2019. Model selection may not be a mandatory step for phylogeny reconstruction. Nature Communications 10:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-019-08822-w.
  • Allard M.W., Honeycut R.L. 1991. Ribosomal DNA variation within and between species of rodents, with emphasis on the genus Onychomys. Molecular Biology and Evolution 8:71-84.
  • Arata A.A. 1964. The anatomy and taxonomic significance of the male accessory reproductive glands of muroid rodents. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 9:1-42.
  • Bailey V. 1929. Life history and habits of grasshopper mice, genus Onychomys. U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 145:1-20.
  • Baird S.F. 1855. Characteristics of some new species of North American Mammalia, collected chiefly in connection with the U.S. surveys of a railroad route to the Pacific. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 7:333-336.
  • Baird S.F. 1857. Mammals of North America; the descriptions of species based chiefly on the collections in the museum of the Smithsonian Institution. J.H. Lippincott & Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Baker R.J., Barnett R.K., Greenbaum I.F. 1979. Chromosomal evolution in grasshopper mice (Onychomys: Cricetidae). Journal of Mammalogy 60:297-306.
  • Barbiere, F., Ronez C., Ortiz P., Martin R., Pardinas U.F.J. 2019.A new nomenclatural system for the study of sigmodontine rodent molars: first step towards an integrative phylogeny of fossil and living cricetids. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 127:224-244.
  • Blair W.F. 1942. Systematic relationships of Peromyscus and several related genera as shown by the baculum. Journal of Mammalogy 23:196-204.
  • Bouckaert R., ET AL. 2019. BEAST 2.5: an advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Computational Biology 15:e1006650.
  • Bradley R., Ordonez-Garza N., Bradley L. 2017. Genus Onychomys Baird, 1858. In: Wilson D.E., Lacher T.E. Jr., Mittermeier R.A., editors. Handbook of the mammals of the world. Volume 7: rodents II. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain; p. 95-96.
  • Bradley R.D., Durish N.D., Rogers D.S., Miller J.R., Engstrom D., Kilpatrick C.W. 2007. Toward a molecular phylogeny for Peromyscus: evidence from mitochondrial cytochrome-b sequences. Journal of Mammalogy 88:1146-1159.
  • Bradley R.D., Edwards C.W., Carroll D.S., Kilpatrick C.W. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of neotomine-peromyscine rodents: based on DNA sequences from mitochondrial cytochrome-b gene. Journal of Mammalogy 85:389-395.
  • Bradley R.D., Schmidly D.J. 1987. The glans penes and bacula in Latin American taxa of the Peromyscus boylii group. Journal of Mammalogy 68:595-616.
  • Burt W.H. 1960. Bacula of North American Mammals. University of Michigan, Miscellaneous Publications of Zoology 113:1-76.
  • Carleton M.D. 1973. A survey of gross stomach morphology in New World Cricetinae (Rodentia, Muroidea), with comments on functional interpretations. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 146:1-43.
  • Carleton M.D. 1980. Phylogenetic relationships in neotomine-peromyscine rodents (Muroidea) and a reappraisal of the dichotomy within New World Cricetinae. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 157:1-146.
  • Carleton M.D. 1989. Systematics and evolution. In: Kirkland G.L. Jr., Layne N.J., editors. Advances in the study of Peromyscus (Rodentia). Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas, USA; p. 7-141.
  • Carleton M.D., Eshelman R.E. 1979. A synopsis of fossil grasshopper mice, genus Onychomys, and their relationships to recent species. Papers on Paleontology, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 21:1-63.
  • Carleton M.D., Hooper E.T., Honacki J. 1975. Karotypes and accessory reproductive glands in the rodent genus Scotinomys. Journal of Mammalogy 56:444-451.
  • Carleton M.D., Musser G.G. 1984. Muroid rodents. In: Anderson S., Jones J.K., editors. Orders and families of Recent mammals of the world. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA; p. 289-379.
  • Carleton M.D., Sanchez O., Vidales G.U. 2002. A new species of Habromys (Muroidea: Neotominae) from Mexico, with generic review of species definitions and remarks on diversity patterns among Mesoamerican small mammals restricted to humid montane forests. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 115:488-533.
  • Carroll D.S., Bradley R.D. 2005. Systematics of the genus Sigmodon: DNA sequences from beta-fibrinogen and cytochrome b. Southwestern Naturalist 50:342-349.
  • Castaneda-Rico S., Leon-Paniagua L., Edwards C.W., Maldonado J.E. 2020. Ancient DNA from museum specimens and next generation sequencing help resolve the controversial evolutionary history of the critically endangered Puebla deer mouse. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8:94.
  • Cazzaniga N.J., Canon C., Pardinas U.F.J. 2019. The availability, authorship and dates of tribal names in the Sigmodontinae (Rodentia, Cricetidae) current classification. Bionomina 15:37-50.
  • Cockerell T.D.A., Miller L.I., Printz M. 1914. The auditory ossicles of American rodents. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 33:347-380.
  • Cope E.D. 1874. Notes on the Santa Fe Marls, and some of the contained vertebrate fossils. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 26:147-152.
  • Coues E.D. 1874. Synopsis of the Muridae of North America. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 26:173-196.
  • D'Elia G. 2003. Phylogenetics of Sigmodontinae (Rodentia, Muroidea, Cricetidae), with special reference to the akodont group, and with additional comments on historical biogeography. Cladistics 19:307-323.
  • Dubois A. 2008. A partial but radical solution to the problem of nomenclatural taxonomic inflation and synonymy load. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 93:857-863.
  • Egoscue H.J. 1960. Laboratory and field studies of the northern grasshopper mouse. Journal of Mammalogy 41:99-110.
  • Ellerman J.R. 1941. The families and genera of living rodents. Vol. II, family Muridae. British Museum (Natural History), London, United Kingdom.
  • Engel S.R., Hogan K.M., Taylor J.F., Davis S.K. 1998. Molecular systematics and paleobiogeography of the South American sigmodontine rodents. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15:35-49.
  • Engesser B. 1979. Relationships of some insectivores and rodents from the Miocene of North America and Europe. Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History 14:1-68.
  • Falbush V.M. 1967. Die Beziehungen zwichen einigen Cricetiden (Mamm., Rodentia) des nordamerikanischen und europaischen Jungtertiars. Palaontologische Zeitschrift 41:154-164.
  • Farris J.S. 1982. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In: Platnick N., Funk V., editors. Advances in Cladistics: Proceedings of the second meeting of the Willi Hennig Society. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA; p. 7-36.
  • Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA-sequences; a maximum-likelihood approach.Journal of Molecular Evolution 17:368-376.
  • Flake L.D. 1973. Food habits of four species of rodents on a shortgrass prairie in Colorado. Journal of Mammalogy 54:636-647.
  • Giglioli E.H. 1874. Ricerche intorno alla distribuzione geografica generale o corologie degli animali vertebrati. III. Regione BoreoAmericana. Bollettino della Societa Geografica Italiana 2:321-366.
  • Golger C.W. 1841. Gemeinnutziges Hand-und Hilfsbuch der Naturgeschichte. Fur gebildete Leser aller Stande, besonders fur die reifere Jugend und ihre Lehrer. U. Schulz und Co., Breslau, Germany.
  • Goloboff P.A., Catalano S.A. 2016. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 32:221-238.
  • Goloboff P.A., Farris J.S., Nixon K.C. 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24:774-786.
  • Hafner M.S., Hafner D.J. 1979. Vocalizations of grasshopper mice (genus Onychomys). Journal of Mammalogy 60:85-94.
  • Harlan R. 1832. Description of new species of quadruped of the genus Arvicola (A. nuttalli). Monthly American Journal of Geology and Natural Science 1:446-447.
  • Hershkovitz P. 1966. Mice, land bridges and Latin American faunal interchange. In: Wenzel R.L., Tipon V.J., editors. Ectoparasites of Panama. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, USA; p. 725-751.
  • Hildebrand M. 1961. Voice of the grasshopper mouse. Journal of Mammalogy 42:263.
  • Hoang D.T., Chernomor O., von Haeseler A., Minh B.Q., Vinh L.S. 2018. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35:518-522.
  • Hollister N. 1914. A systematic account of the grasshopper mice. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 47:427-489.
  • Hooper E.T. 1958. The male phallus in mice of the genus Peromyscus. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 105:1-24.
  • Hooper E.T., Musser G.G. 1964b. The glans penis in neotropical cricetines (Family Muridae) with comments on the classification of muroid rodents. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 123:1-57.
  • Hooper E.T., Musser G.G. 1964a. Notes on the classification of the rodent genus Peromyscus. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 635:1-13.
  • Horner B.E., Taylor J.M., Padykula H.A. 1965. Food habits and gastric morphology of the grasshopper mouse. Journal of Mammalogy 45:513-535.
  • Howell A.H. 1914. Revision of the North American harvest mice (genus Reithrodontomys). North American Fauna 36:1-97.
  • Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F., Nielsen R., Bollback J. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310-2314.
  • Jacobs L.L., Lindsay E.H. 1984. Holarctic radiation of Neogene muroid rodents and the origin of South American cricetids. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 4:265-272.
  • Keith M.S. 2015. Phylogenetic relationships, divergence and radiation within the subfamily Neotominae (Rodentia: Cricetidae). Ph.D. dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
  • Kelly T.S., Martin R.A., Ronez C. 2020. New records of cricetid rodents from the medial Clarendonian (middle Miocene) Esmeralda Formation, Fish Lake Valley, Nevada. Paludicola 13:1-32.
  • Kelly T.S., Whistler D.P. 2014. New late Miocene (latest Clarendonian to early Hemphillian) cricetid rodents from the upper part of the Dove Spring Formation, Mojave Desert, California. Paludicola 10:1-48.
  • Kluge A.G., Farris J.S. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology 18:1585-1593.
  • Koenigswald W. 2011. Diversity of hypsodont teeth in mammalian dentitions -construction and classification. Palaeontographica A 294:63-94.
  • Koenigswald W. v. 2020. Construction and wear of mammalian teeth in terms of heterochrony. In: Martin T., Koenigswald W. von, editors. Mammalian teeth -form and function. Verlag, Munchen, Germany; p. 171-186.
  • Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C., Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35:1547-1549.
  • Larkin M.A., ET AL. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947-2948.
  • Leon-Paniagua L., Navarro-Siguenza A.G., Hernandez-Banos B.E., Morales J.C. 2007. Diversification of the arboreal mice of the genus Habromys (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Neotominae) in the Mesoamerican highlands. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 42:653-664.
  • Leon-Tapia M.A., Cervantes, F.A. 2021. Systematics and the unexpected high mitochrondrial genetic divergence of Nelsonia goldmani (Rodentia: Cricetidae) from Mexican highlands. Journal of Mammalian Evolution. https://www.sciencegate.app/document/10.1007/s10914-020-09532-7. Accessed 16 February 2021.
  • Lewis P.O.2001.A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology 50:913-925.
  • Lindsay E.H. 1972. Small mammal fossils from the Barstow Formation, California. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 93:1-104.
  • Lindsay E.H. 1995. Copemys and the Barstovian/Hemingfordian boundary. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 15:357-365.
  • Lindsay E.H. 2008. Cricetidae.In: Janis C.M., Gunnell G.F., Uhen M.D., editors. Evolution of tertiary mammals of North America. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA; p. 456-479.
  • Lindsay E.H., Jacobs L.L., Tessman N.D. 2006. Vertebrate fossils from Yepomera, Chihuahua, Mexico. In: Carranza-Castaneda O., Lindsay E.H., editors. Advances in late tertiary vertebrate paleontology in Mexico and the Great American Biotic Interchange. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Geologia and Centro de Geosciencias, Publicacion Especial 4, Coyoacan, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico; p. 19-32.
  • Lindsay E.H., Mou Y., Downs W., Pederson J., Kelly T.S., Henry C., Trexler J. 2002. Recognition of the Hemphillian/Blancan boundary in Nevada. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22:429-442.
  • Linzey D.W., Packard R.L. 1977. Ochrotomys nuttalli. American Society of Mammalogists. Mammalian Species 75:1-6.
  • Maridet O., Wu W.Y., Ye J., Bi S., Ni X., Meng J. 2011. Earliest occurrence of Democricetodon in China, in the early Miocene of the Junggar Basin (Xinjiang), China. American Museum Novitates 3665:1-21.
  • Martin R.A. 2019. Correlation of Pliocene and Pleistocene fossil assemblages from the central and eastern United States: towards a continental rodent biochronology. Historical Biology 33:880-896. doi:10.1080/08912963.2019.1666118.
  • Martin R.A., Pelaez-Campomanes P., Honey J.G., Fox D.L., Zakrzewski R.J., Albright L.B., Lindsay E.H., Opdyke N.D., Goodwin H.T. 2008. Rodent community change at the PliocenePleistocene transition in southwestern Kansas and identification of the Microtus immigration event on the Central Great Plains. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 267:196-207.
  • Martin R.A., Pelaez-Campomanes P., Ronez C., Barbiere F., Kelly T.S., Lindsay E.H., Baskin J.A., Czaplewski N.J., Pardinas U.F.J. 2020. A new genus of cricetid rodent (Rodentia: Cricetidae) from the Clarendonian (Late Miocene) of North America and a consideration of sigmodontine origins. Paludicola 12:298-329.
  • Martin R.A., Zakrzewski R.J. 2019. On the ancestry of woodrats. Journal of Mammalogy 100:1564-1582.
  • May S.R., Woodburne M.O., Lindsay E.H., Albright L.B., SarnaWojcicki A., Wan E., Wahl D.B. 2011. Geology and mammalian paleontology of the Horn Toad Hills, Mojave Desert, California, USA. Palaeontologia Electronica 14. https://palaeo-electronica. org/2011_3/11_may/index.html. Accessed 5 January 2021.
  • McCarty R. 1978. Onychomys leucogaster. Mammalian Species 87:1-6.
  • Mearns E.A. 1896. Preliminary diagnoses of new mammals from the Mexican border of the United States. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 18:443-447.
  • Merriam C.H. 1892. Descriptions of new mammals collected by E. W. Nelson in the states of Colima and Jalisco, Mexico. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 7:164-174.
  • Merriam C.H. 1894. A new subfamily of murine rodents - the Neotominae - with description of a new genus and species and a synopsis of the known forms. Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Sciences 46:225-252.
  • Merriam C.H. 1897. Nelsonia neotomodon, a new genus and species of murine rodent from Mexico. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 11:277-279.
  • Merriam C.H. 1898a. Descriptions of twenty new species and a new subgenus of Peromyscus from Mexico and Guatemala. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 12:115-125.
  • Merriam C.H. 1898b. A new genus (Neotomodon) and three new species of murine rodents from the mountains of southern Mexico. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 12:127-129.
  • Miller J.R., Engstrom M.D. 2008. The relationships of major lineages within peromyscine rodents: a molecular phylogenetic hypothesis and systematic reappraisal. Journal of Mammalogy 89:1279-1295.
  • Musser G.G., Carleton M.D. 2005. Superfamily Muroidea. In: Wilson D.E., Reeder D.M., editors. Mammals species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. 3rd ed. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; p. 894-1531.
  • Nguyen L.T., Schmidt H.A., von Haeseler A., Minh B.Q. 2015. IQ - TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32:268-274.
  • Osgood W.H. 1909. Revision of the mice of the American genus Peromyscus. North American Fauna 28:1-285.
  • Padial J.M., de la Riva I. 2006. Taxonomic inflation and the stability of species lists: the perils of Ostrich's behavior. Systematic Biology 55:859-867.
  • Pardinas U.F.J., Canon C., Galliari C.A., Brito J., Hoverud N.B., Lessa G., de Oliveria J.A. 2020. Gross stomach morphology in akodontine rodents (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae: Akodontini): a reappraisal of its significance in a phylogenetic context. Journal of Mammalogy 101:835-857.
  • Pasch B., Tokuda I.T., Riede T. 2017. Grasshopper mice employ distinct vocal production mechanisms in different social contexts. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B: Biological Sciences 284:20171158.
  • Platt R.N. II, Amman B.R., Keith M.S., Thompson C.W., Bradley R.D. 2015. What is Peromyscus? Evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences for a new classification. Journal of Mammalogy 96:708-719.
  • Rambaut A., Drummond A.J., Xie D., Baele G., Suchard M.A. 2018. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67:901-904.
  • Reeder S.A., Bradley R.D. 2004. Molecular systematic of Neotomine-peromyscine rodents based on the dentin matrix protein 1 gene. Journal of Mammalogy 85:1194-1200.
  • Reeder S.A., Bradley R.D. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships of Neotomine-Peromycine rodents using DNA sequences from beta fibrinogen and cytochrome b. In: Kelt D., Kaspin D., editors. The quintessential naturalist: honoring the life and legacy of Oliver P. Pearson. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA; p. 883-900.
  • Reeder S.A., Carroll D.S., Edwards C.W., Kilpatrick C.W., Bradley R.D. 2006. Neotomine-peromyscine rodent systematic based on combined analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40:251-258.
  • Riddle B.R., Honeycutt R.L. 1990. Historical biogeography in North American arid regions: an approach using mitochrondrial-DNA phylogeny in grasshopper mice (genus Onychomys). Evolution 44:1-15.
  • Ronez C., Martin R.A., Kelly T.S., Barbiere F., Pardinas U.F.J. 2021. A brief critical review of sigmodontine rodent origins, with emphasis on paleontological data. In: Pardinas U.F.J., Galliari C., editors. El ultimo naturalista tipologo: contribuciones en honor a Elio Massoia. Mastozoologia Neotropical 48:1-26.
  • Ronez C., Martin R.A., Pardinas U.F.J. 2020. Morphological revision of Copemys loxodon, type species of the Miocene cricetid Copemys (Mammalia, Rodentia): a key to understanding the history of New World cricetids. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 40:e1772273.
  • Ronquist F., Teslenko M., Mark P.V.D., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Hohna S. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61:539-542.
  • Rowe A.H., Rowe M.P. 2008. Physiological resistance of grasshopper mice (Onychomys spp.) to Arizona bark scorpion (Centruoides exilicauda) venom. Toxicon 52:597-605.
  • Rowe A.H., Xiao Y., Rowe M.P., Cummins T.R., Zakon H.H. 2013. Voltage-gated sodium channel in grasshopper mice defends against bark scorpion toxin. Science 342:441-446.
  • Ruffer D.G. 1968. Agonistic behavior of the northern grasshopper mouse (Onychomys leucogaster breviauritus). Journal of Mammalogy 49:481-487.
  • Satoh K., Iwaku F. 2006. Jaw muscle functional anatomy in northern grasshopper mouse, Onychomys leucogaster, a carnivorous murid. Journal of Morphology 267:987-999.
  • Say T., Ord G. 1825. Description of a new species of Mammalia, whereon a new genus is proposed to be found. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia 4:352-355.
  • Schenk J.J., Rowe y K.C., Steppan S.J. 2013. Ecological opportunity and incumbency in the diversification of repeated continental colonizations by muroid rodents. Systematic Biology 62:837-864.
  • Sprague J.M. 1941. A study of the hyoid apparatus of the Cricetinae. Journal of Mammalogy 22:296-310.
  • Stangl F.B., Baker R.J. 1984. Evolutionary relationships in Peromyscus: congruence in chromosomal, genic, and classical data sets. Journal of Mammalogy 65:643-654.
  • Steppan S.J., Schenk J.J. 2017. Muroid rodent phylogenetics: 900-species tree reveals increasing diversification rates. PLoS One 12:e0183070.
  • Sullivan J.K., Holsinger K.E., Simon C. 1995. Among-site variation and phylogenetic analysis of 12SrRNA in sigmodontine rodents. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12:988-1001.
  • Sullivan K.A.M., Platt R.N., Bradley R.D., Ray D.A. 2017. Whole mitochondrial genomes provide increased resolution and indicate paraphyly in deer mice. BMC Zoology 2:11.
  • Swofford D.L. 2000. PAUP*: phylogenetics analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Tedford T.H., Albright L.B. III, Barnosky A.D., FerrusquiaVillafranca I., Hunt R.M. Jr., Storer J.E., Swisher C.C. III, Voorhies M.R., Webb S.D., Whistler D.P. 2004. Mammalian biochronology of the Arikareean through Hemphillian interval (late Oligocene through early Pliocene epochs). In: Woodburne M.O., editor. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic mammals of North America. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA; p. 169-231.
  • Thomas O. 1887. Diagnosis of a new species of Hesperomys from North America. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5 19:66.
  • Thomas O. 1888. On a new and interesting annectant genus of Muridae, with remarks on the relations of Old and New World members of the family. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London for the year 1888:130-134.
  • Thomas O. 1913. New forms of Akodon and Phyllotis, and a new genus for "Akodon" teguina. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 8 11:404-409.
  • True F.W. 1894. On the relationships of Talyor's mouse, Sitomys taylori. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 16:757-758.
  • Vianey-Liaud M. 1974. L'anatomie craienne des genres Eucricetodon et Pseudocricetodon (Cricetidae, Rodentia, Mammalia); essai de systematique des Cricetudes Oligocenes d'Europe occidentale. Geologie Mediterraneenne 1:11-131.
  • Vorontsov N.N. 1959. The system of hamsters (Cricetinae) in the sphere of the world fauna and their phylogenetic relations. Byulleten' Moskovskovo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody, Otdel Biologicheskii 64:134-137.
  • Vorontsov N.N. 1967. Evoлюtii piщivaрitiльнoй сiсtiмы u gрыzuнov- мioмoрфov. Nauka Publishing, Novosibirsk, Russia (in Russian). English translation 1979. Evolution of the alimentary system in myomorph rodents. Smithsonian Institution and the National Science Foundation, Washington, District of Columbia (translated by the Indian National Science Documentation Center, New Delhi, India).
  • Vorontsov N.N. 1982. Primitive hamsters (Cricetidae) of the world fauna. Nauka Publishing, Leningrad, Russia.
  • Wagner A. 1845. Diagnosen einiger neuen Arten von Nagren und Hadfluglern. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte 11:148.
  • Wied M. Prinz zu. 1841. Reise in Das Innere Nord-Amerkica in den Jahren 1832 bis 1834. J. Holscher, Coblenz, Germany.
  • Williams S.H., Peiffer E., Ford S. 2009. Gape and bite force in the rodents Onychomys leucogaster and Peromyscus maniculatus: does jaw-muscle anatomy predict performance. Journal of Morphology 270:1338-1347.
  • Zachos F.E., ET AL. 2013. Species inflation and taxonomic artefacts -a critical comment on recent trends in mammalian classification. Mammalian Biology 78:1-6.