Published March 12, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

SUCCESSFUL TREATMENT OF SEVERE ARDS CAUSED BY COVID-19 PNEUMO-NIA IN A PARTURIENT WITH NON-INVASIVE VENTILATION- A CASE REPORT

Creators

Description

Abstract

Recent COVID-19 pandemic has led to worldwide increase in cases of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Pregnancy is associated with physiological respiratory, cardiovascular and immunological changes, which could lead to development of severe viral pulmonary complications. That cause higher rate of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality.

Application of non –invasive ventilation strategies for treatment of mild to moderate cases of hypoxic Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in pregnant women may improve their condition and decrease cases of endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation. More investigations for the most successful method of non-invasive mechanical ventilation in pregnant women are necessary.

Other

References:

1.    Lo Mouro A, Aliverti A. Respiratory physiology of pregnancy. Breathe.2015;11:297-   30.110.1183/20734734735.000615

2.    Liu D, Li L, Wu X et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pneumonia: a preliminary analysis. AJR AMJ Roentgenicol.2020;215:127-32.102214/AJR;20.23072

3.    Lim K, Han C et al. Effect of transnasal high –flow humidifying oxygen therapy for the treatment of new coronavirus pneumonia with acute resp. failure. Chinese journal of Coal Industry Medicine.2020;23:221-224

4.    Perkins GD, Ji C, Connolly B et al. An adaptive randomized controlled trial of non –invasive resp. strategies in acute resp. failure patients with COVID-19 med. RXIV.2021:2021.080221261379

5.    Teng Xb, Shen Y, Han ML, Yang G, Cha L, Shi Jf. The value of high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in treating novel coronavirus pneumonia. European Journal of Clinical investigation2021;51(3):e13435-n/a

6.    Ospina-Tascon GH, Calderon-Tapia LE, Garcia AF et al. Effect of High- Flow –Oxygen – therapy vs Conventional Oxygen therapy on Invasive Mechanical ventilation and clinical recovery in patients with severe COVID-19. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;326(21):2161-2171

7.    Grieco DL, Menga LS, Cesarano M et al. Effect of Helmet Non-Invasive Ventilation vs high flow nasal oxygen on days free of respiratory support in patients with COVID-19 and moderate to severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure :The HENIVOT Randomized clinical trial JAMA. May4 2021;325(17):1731-1743.doi.10.1001/jama 2021.4682

8.    Trerring J, Anesson A, Nielse W. Helmet Continuous Positive Airway Pressure versus high flow nasal cannula in COVID-19: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial ( COVID HELMET) .trials.dec.3.2020 21(1):994.doi.10.1186/313063-020-04863-5

9.    Brambilla AM, Alibert S, Prina E et al. Helmet CPAP vs Oxygen therapy in severe hypoxemic resp. failure due to pneumonia. Intensive Care Med.jul.2014;40171(7):942-9.doi.101007/300134-014-3325-5

10.    Faverio P, Ornaghi S, Stainer A, Invernizzi F, Borelli M, Brunetti F, La Milia L, Paolini V, Rona R, Foti G, Luppi F, Vergani P, Pesci A. Feasibility of CPAP application and variables related to worsening of respiratory failure in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: Experience of a tertiary care centre. PLoS One. 2021 Oct 19;16(10):e0258754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258754. PMID: 34665818; PMCID: PMC8525751.

11.    Lapinsky SE. Management of ARDS in pregnancy. Jemin Respir Crit.Care Med.2017;38:201-7.10.1055/5-0037-1600909

12.    Jang J, Guo Y, Fan C et. al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnant women: a report based on 116 cases 2020. Am J Obstet.Gynecol.2020;223:111e1-111e14

13.    Fan H, Cai J, Tian A, Li Y, Yuan H, Jiang Z, et al . Comparison of liver biomarkers in 288 COVID-19 patients: A mono-centric study in the early phase of pandemic. Front Med(Lausanne).2021;7-584888

14.    Stringer D, Braude P, Myint PK, Evans L, Collins JT, Verduri A, et al. COPE Study Collaborators.The role of C-reactive protein as a prognostic marker in COVID-19 .Int.J. Epidemiol.2021;50(2):420-29

15.    Liufu R, Wang CY,Weng L, Du B. Newly Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Does Inclusion of High Flow Nasal Cannula Solve the Problem? J Clin. Med. 2023 Jan 29;12(3):1043. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031043. PMID: 36769691; PMCID: PMC9917973.

16.    Michelle J. Lim, Satyan Lakshminrusimha, Herman Hedriana, Timothy Albertson. Pregnancy and Severe ARDS with COVID-19: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Outcomes and Treatment. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine.2023; 28(1) :101426; 1744-165X.

17.    Val Catanzarite, David Willms, Davies Wong, Charles Landers, Larry Cousins, David Schrimmer. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in pregnancy and the puerperium: causes, courses, and outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology.2001; 97( 5);1:760-764: 0029-7844.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01231

18.    X.R.G. Brower, M.A. Matthay, A. Morris, D. Schoenfeld, B.T. Thompson, A. Wheeler, A.R.D.S. Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome.N Engl JMed, 342 (18) (2000), pp. 1301-1308

19.    L.A. Campbell, R.A. Klocke. Implications for the pregnant patient. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 163 (5) (2001), pp. 1051-1054

20.    C. OxfordHorrey, M. Savage, M. Prabhu, S. Abramovitz, K. Griffin, E. LaFond, L. Riley, S.R. Easter.Putting it all together: clinical considerations in the care of critically ill obstetric patients with COVID-19.Am J Perinatol, 37 (10) (2020), pp. 1044-1051

21.    C. Benski, D. Di Filippo, G. Taraschi, M.R. Reich. Guidelines for pregnancy management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a public health conundrum. Int J Environ Res Publ Health, 17 (21) (2020)

22.    Péju E, Belicard F, Silva S, Hraiech S, Painvin B, Kamel T, Thille AW, Goury A, Grimaldi D, Jung B, Piagnerelli M, Winiszewski H, Jourdain M, Jozwiak M; COVIDPREG Study Group. Management and outcomes of pregnant women admitted to intensive care unit for severe pneumonia related to SARS-CoV-2 infection: the multicenter and international COVIDPREG study. Intensive Care Med. 2022 Sep;48(9):1185-1196. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06833-8. Epub 2022 Aug 17. PMID: 35978137; PMCID: PMC9383668.

23.    W. Alhazzani, K.K.S. Parhar, J. Weatherald, Z. Al Duhailib, M. Alshahrani, A. Al-Fares, S. Buabbas, S.V. Cherian, L. Munshi, E. Fan, et al.Effect of awake prone positioning on endotracheal intubation in patients with COVID-19 and acute respiratory failure: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA, 327 (21) (2022), pp. 2104-2113

24.    Jackson A, Neyroud F, Barnsley J, Hunter E, Beecham R, Radharetnas M, Grocott MPW, Dushianthan A. Prone Positioning in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: Timing of Initiation and Outcomes. J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 23;12(13):4226. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134226. PMID: 37445260; PMCID: PMC10342481.

25.    M.C. Tolcher, J.R. McKinney, C.S. Eppes, D. Muigai, A. Shamshirsaz, K.K. Guntupalli, J.L. Nates.Prone positioning for pregnant women with hypoxemia due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Obstet Gynecol, 136 (2) (2020), pp. 259-261

Files

NJD_128-21-24.pdf

Files (667.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:fc71870b71f982147f958cdb19986683
667.3 kB Preview Download