Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published June 8, 2023 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Central West Morocco: new records and key to females of all recorded Moroccan species

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Laboratory of Biotechnology and Valorisation of Natural Resources, Faculty of Sciences, 80000 Agadir, Ibn Zohr University (UIZ), Agadir, Morocco.
  • 2. Laboratory of Biotechnology and Valorisation of Natural Resources, Faculty of Sciences, 80000 Agadir, Ibn Zohr University (UIZ), Agadir, Morocco
  • 3. CBGP, Institut Agro, CIRAD, INRAE, IRD, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Description

ZahidiK, Abdelaziz, Akchour, Abdellah, K, Serge Kreiter, TixierK, Marie-Stéphane, MsandaK, Fouad, MousadikK, Abdelhamid El (2023): Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Central West Morocco: new records and key to females of all recorded Moroccan species. Acarologia 63 (3): 691-724, DOI: 10.24349/v5of-5oe1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24349/v5of-5oe1

Files

source.pdf

Files (853.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e693b570fb87b5d5f6d14bdc5bf9b38d
853.8 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FF93B570FF87FFD5FFD1FFDCFFF9FF8D
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF93B570FF87FFD5FFD1FFDCFFF9FF8D

Cites
Publication: 10.21608/ajesa.2012.163618 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.3865.1.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11158/saa.26.8.5 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1051/acarologia/20164154 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3406/barb.1959.67654 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/BF02372991 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647954.2015.1037792 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1046/j.1440-6055.1999.00096.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.4500.4.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1163/26660644-04601005 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10493-014-9869-9 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10493-014-9873-0 (DOI)
Publication: 10.4039/Ent8826-1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.4039/Ent89289-7 (DOI)
Publication: 10.4039/entm9112fv (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647959408684022 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647950308684319 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647950408684388 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647950508684424 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647950608684439 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1139/z82-385 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1139/z83-151 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1139/z86-405 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1139/z87-272 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647959008683857 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3733/hilg.v45n07p173 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10526-009-9234-9 (DOI)
Publication: 10.2307/3492606 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.3795.5.6 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647959608684080 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647950208684308 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11158/saa.24.5.2 (DOI)
Publication: 10.31019/tbmd.463913 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1967.tb03837.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1023/A:1006297225577 (DOI)
Publication: 10.12782/specdiv.3.25 (DOI)
Publication: 10.5772/54199 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.12.010 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/00222935208654311 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/00222938700770921 (DOI)
Publication: 10.24349/acarologia/20204366 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11158/saa.12.3.4 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11158/saa.23.5.8 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/BF01193168 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/BF02372323 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10493-008-9151-0 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1653/0015-4040(2008)91%5B436:EOTBCA%5D2.0.CO?2 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1093/aesa/51.1.69 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1093/jee/tov084 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.1880.1.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.1884.1.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647957508683746 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1093/jee/85.5.1926 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11158/saa.15.3.6 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647950208684313 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.002413 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1051/acarologia/20122048 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01516.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1002/mmnz.4830590203 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.1.3 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1023/B:BICO.0000046733.53887.2b (DOI)
Publication: 10.1046/j.1472-8206.2002.02034.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.5656/KSAE.2008.47.4.429 (DOI)
Publication: 10.2307/3494423 (DOI)
Publication: 10.24349/acarologia/20204364 (DOI)
Publication: 10.24349/acarologia/20184273 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1017/S1742758400012236 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1051/acarologia/20162254 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3923/je.2020.48.57 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3923/je.2020.48 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.291 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3733/hilg.v40n11p331 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647958408683347 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11158/saa.18.4.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01413.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10526-006-9013-9 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1939.tb06973.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1556/APhyt.45.2010.2.12 (DOI)
Publication: 10.2300/acari.13.141 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.434.1.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.3.1.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647958908683829 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10493-008-9197-z (DOI)
Publication: 10.1093/aesa/48.4.262 (DOI)
Publication: 10.2307/3493156 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00115-6 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/BF03050263 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.1389.1.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1023/A:1017976725685 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1023/A:1021559421344 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/BF00052876 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3733/hilg.v33n07p205 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3390/insects12080664 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647957808683118 (DOI)
Publication: 10.32473/edis-in639-2005 (DOI)
Publication: 10.21608/eajbsa.2010.15185 (DOI)
Publication: 10.4039/Ent110859-8 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1978.tb01950.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1051/acarologia/20122072 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3733/hilg.v34n07p191 (DOI)
Publication: 10.5962/bhl.part.3644 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/BF02981145 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647959308683534 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.4067.5.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.3721.2.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1071/IS07052 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1603/AN09092 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/00222930903383529 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10493-013-9740-4 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1603/0046-225X-29.6.1251 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11158/saa.24.9.12 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.04.006 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1023/A:1006227704122 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10526-004-5280-5 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10493-004-3940-x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1071/ZO9920593 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.000533 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1071/ZO9540169 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647958308683319 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10493-010-9412-6 (DOI)
Has part
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF84FFD6FE3AFE37FCCFFDBA (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786257 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF84FFD6FE3AFDB4FC65FD39 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786259 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF84FFD6FE3AFD3AFCDBFCBC (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786261 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF84FFD6FE3AFC85FBD2F898 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF84FFD1FE3AF8E1FB68FABE (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF83FFD0FE3AFA80FDC9FDF4 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786263 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF82FFD0FE3AFD7EFAAFFA3C (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF82FFD3FE3AFA05FA7DFDF4 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF81FFD3FE3AFD77FD36FC95 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786265 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF81FFD3FE3AFC9DFA6DFA94 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786268 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF81FFD3FE3AFA9DFB57F80D (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786272 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF81FFD3FE3AF86DFC51F870 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786274 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF80FFD2FE3AFF39FCEFFEBD (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786278 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF80FFD2FE3AFE84FCE6FA13 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786284 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF80FFD2FE3AFA13FC69F996 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786290 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF80FFD2FE3AF990FBF7F915 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786298 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF80FFD2FE3AF91CFC63F880 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786300 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF80FFDDFE3AF8E9FB13FE41 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786302 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8FFFDDFE3AFE22FCCBFDC7 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786305 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8FFFDDFE3AFDAEFCB9FA29 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786307 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8FFFDDFE3AFA09FCD3F9AC (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786309 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8FFFDCFE3AF995FBD7FC6E (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786311 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8EFFDCFE3AFBD7FAC0F9A5 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8EFFDFFE3AF98DFBCBFBB7 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786313 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8DFFDEFE3AFBBFFDD4FECF (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786317 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8CFFDEFE3AFEADFC31FE31 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8CFFDEFE3AFE38FB27FAF9 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786319 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8CFFDEFE3AFA40FC7EFA65 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786321 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8CFFDEFE3AF9CCFC7EF9D1 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8CFFDEFE3AF958FB8DF95C (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8CFFDEFE3AF925FC03F870 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8BFFD9FE3AFEB7FAC7FD73 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786327 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8BFFD9FE3AFCFBFBA0F83F (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786329 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8AFFD8FE3AFF3FFB0BFC44 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8AFFD8FE3AFC25FC0FFB05 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786331 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF8AFFDBFE3AFB6CFD05FE40 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF89FFDBFE3AFE22FCF0FDC7 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF89FFDBFE3AFDA7FCEBFD4B (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF89FFDBFE3AFD33FC3BF97D (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786335 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF89FFDBFE3AF8FDFCA6F8E0 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF89FFDBFE3AF841FC70F864 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786341 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF88FFDAFE3AFF39FCEFFEBD (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF88FFDAFE3AFE84FC38FB21 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786345 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF88FFDAFE3AFB01FCC5FAA4 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786347 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF88FFDAFE3AFA86FCD8FA28 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786352 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF88FFC5FE3AFA12FCE3FDDA (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF97FFC5FE3AFDA3FC07FB10 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786354 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF97FFC5FE3AFB12FCA6FA97 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786356 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF97FFC5FE3AFA9EFCF1F8D2 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786360 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF97FFC4FE3AF854FC16FD43 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786370 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF96FFC4FE3AFCDCFCAFFCC6 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF96FFC4FE3AFCA0FC2CFC45 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF96FFC4FE3AFC2CFA30F88D (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF96FFC4FE3AF8F4FCAFF8F8 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10786376 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF95FFC7FE3AFF3FFB22FD82 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AACD08FF95FFC3FE3AFDEBFA21F908 (URL)

References

  • Abbassy M.R. 1990. Contribution a la lutte biologique contre les Homopteres ravageurs des Citrus au Maroc. These de Doctorat en Agronomie, Faculte Universitaire des Sciences Agronomiques de Gembloux, 185 pp.
  • Abbassy M.R., Hendy H.H., Mowafi M.H., Nawar M.A. 2012. Biology of Euseius scutalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Tetranychus urticae and Panonychus ulmi (Acari: Tetranychidae) at different temperatures. Acarines, 6: 15-19. https://doi.org/10.21608/ajesa.2012.163618
  • Abbasova E.D. 1972. Phytoseiid mites (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) of Azerbaijan. Avtoreferat Dissertatsii na Soiskanie Uchenoy Stepeni Kandidata Biologicheskikh Nauk. Akadrmiya Nauk Azerbaydzhanskoy SSR, Institut Zoologie, Baku, Azerbaijan. 34 pp. [in Russian].
  • Abo-Shnaf R., Moraes G.J. de. 2014. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Egypt, with new records, descriptions of new species, and a key species. Zootaxa, 3865: 1-71. https://doi.org/10.11646/ zootaxa.3865.1.1
  • Akchour A., Lamharchi H., Zahidi A., El Mousadik A. 2016. Population dynamics of Eutetranychus orientalis Klein (Tetranychidae, Acari) in citrus orchard in Taroudant region. The 3rd International American Moroccan Agricultural Sciences Conference - AMAS Conference III? December 13-16, 2016, Ouarzazate, Morocco [Poster Session I (40)].
  • Akchour A., Zahidi A., Auger P., Kreiter S., El Mousadik A. 2021. Seasonal trend of Eutetranychus orientalis (Acari - Prostigmata) in Moroccan citrus orchards and its potential control by Neoseiulus californicus and Stethorus punctillum. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 26: 8. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.26.8.5
  • Alatawi F.J., Basahih B.J., Kamran M. 2017. The superfamily Phytoseioidea (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Saudi Arabia: a new species, new records and a key to the reported species. Acarologia, 57: 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/20164154
  • Amitai S., Grinberg T. 1971. Description of a new phytoseiid genus and species (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from Israel. Israel J. Entomol., 6: 327-335.
  • Amitai S., Swirski E. 1966. Illustrations of spermathecae in several previously described phytoseiid mites (Acarina) from Hong Kong and Israel. Israel J. Agric. Res., 16: 19-24.
  • Andre H.M. 1986. Notes on the ecology of corticolous epiphyte dwellers. 4. Actinedida (especially Tydeidae) and Gamasida (especially Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 27: 107-115.
  • Arutunjan E.S. 1970. Phytoseiid mites (Phytoseiida) on agricultural crops of the Armenian SSR Akademii Nauk Armyanskoi SSR, Otdelenie Biologicheskikh Nauk, Dissertatsii na Soiskanie Uchenoi Stepeni Candidata Biol. Nauk, Zooliya, 97, 31 pp.
  • Arutunjan E.S. 1977. Identification manual of phytoseiid mites of agricultural crops of the Armenian S.S.R. Izdat. An. Armenian SSR Erevan. 177-177.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1957a. Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina, Gamasida) d'Algerie. I. Genres Blattisocius Keegan, Iphiseius Berlese, Amblyseius Berlese, Phytoseius Ribaga, Phytoseiulus Evans. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afr. Nord, 48: 319-352.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1957b. Typhlodromus ornatus n. sp. et Typhlodromus longilaterus n. sp. (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) mesostigmates predateurs d'Algerie. Rev. Pathol. Veget. Entomol. Agric. France, 36: 215-222.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1958. Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina, Gamasina) d'Algerie. II. Phytoseiidae: cle des genres, genres Amblyseius Berlese (suite) et Seiulus Berlese. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afr. Nord, 49: 23-43.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1959. Acariens planticoles d'Algerie. I. 5 eme contribution au genre Amblyseius Berlese (Phytoseiidae). II.Premiere liste d'Actinochitinosi (Cheyletidae, Caligonellidae, Hemisarcoptidae). Bull. Acad. Roy. Belgique, 45: 130-153. https://doi.org/10.3406/barb.1959.67654
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1960a. Nouveaux Amblyseius d'Algerie (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 2: 288-299.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1960b. Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina: Gamasina) d'Algerie. IV. Genre Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afr. Nord, 51: 62-107.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1961. Mesostigmates (Urop. excl.) edaphiques Mediterraneens (Acaromorpha, Anactinotrichida). Acarologia, 3, 381-509.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1962. Amblyseius swirskii, un nouveau phytoseiide voisin d' A. andersoni(Acariens anactinotriches). Ann. Ecole Nat. Agric. Alger., 3: 1-7.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1966. Contribution a l'etude des Amblyseius palearctiques (Acariens anactinotriches, Phytoseiidae). Bull. Scientif. Bourgogne, 24: 181-230.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1977. Nouvelles notes sur les Amblyseiini. III. Sur le genre Cydnodromus: Redefinition, composition (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga, 22: 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02372991
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1978. Typhlodromini du Vaucluse, avec description de trois especes nouvelles (Arachnides, Gamasides, Phytotseiidae). Anna. Zool. Ecol. Anim., 10: 695-701.
  • Basahih J.S., Kamran M., Alatawi F.J. 2015. First record of Euseius batus (Ueckermann and Loots) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from the Asian continent, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Acarol., 41: 267-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647954.2015.1037792
  • Basha A. E., Yousef A. A., Ibrahim M. H., Mostafa E. M. 2001. Five new phytoseiids from Egypt (Acari: Gamasida: Phytoseiidae). Al-Azhar J. Agric. Res., 33: 371-386.
  • Beard J.J. 1999. Taxonomy and bological control: Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae), a case study. Austral. J. Entomol., 38: 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-6055.1999.00096.x
  • Beaulieu F, Beard J.J. 2018. Acarine biocontrol agents Neoseiulus californicus sensu Athias-Henriot (1977) and N. barkeri (Hughes) (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) redescribed, their synonymies assessed, and the identity of N. californicus (McGregor) clarified. Zootaxa, 4500 (4): 451-507. https: //doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4500.4.1
  • Beglyarov G.A. 1958. Species of Phytoseiidae (Parasititormes: Gamasoidea) predatory upon tetranychid mites in orchards of the Krasnodar region. Trud. Vseso. Inst. Zashc. Rast., 10: 98-124.
  • Benziane T., Abbassi M., Farih M. 2003. La lutte dirigee: une etape fondamentale dans l'adoption de la lutte integree contre les ravageurs en vergers d'agrumes. Al Awamia, 107: 11-28.
  • Berlese, A. 1887. Acari, Myriapoda and Scorpiones hucusque in Italia reperta. Ordo Mesostigmata (Gamasidae). Tipografia del Seminario, Padua 6: 6-7.
  • Berlese A. 1889. Acari, Myriopoda et Scorpiones hucusque in Italia reporta. Tipografia del Seminario. Podua, 7: 8-9.
  • Berlese A. 1913. Systema Acarorum genera in familiis suis disposita. Acaroteca Italica, 1-2: 3-19.
  • Berlese A. 1914. Acari nouvi. Manipulus IX. Redia, 10: 113-150.
  • Berleze A. 1916. Centuria terza di Acari nuovi. Redia, 12: 289-338.
  • Berlese A. 1921. Acari, Myriopoda et Pseudoscorpiones hucusque in Italia reperta. I. Indice sinonimico dei generi e delle specie illustrate nei fascicoli 1 a 101. Redia, 14: 77-105.
  • Blommers L. 1976. Some Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from Madagascar, with descriptions of eight new species and notes on their biology. Bijd. tot Dierk., 46: 80-106. https://doi.org/10.1163/ 26660644-04601005
  • Bolland H.R., Gutierrez J., Flechtmann C.H.W. 1998. World Catalogue of The Spider Mite Family (Acari: Tetranychidae). Leiden, Brill, 392 pp.
  • Boller E.F. 1984. Eineainfache Ausschwemm-methodezurschellen Erfassung von raumilben, Thrips and andren Kleinarthropodenimb Weinbau. Schweizerische Zeit. Obst- Weinbau, 120: 249-255.
  • Buitenhuis R., Murphy G., Shipp L., Scott-Dupree C. 2014. Amblyseius swirskii in greenhouse production systems: a floricultural perspective. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 64: 1-17. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10493-014-9869-9
  • Calvo F.J., Knapp M., van Houten Y.M., Hoogerbrugge H., Belda J.E. 2015. Amblyseius swirskii: What made this predatory mite such a successful biocontrol agent? Exp. Appl. Acarol., 65: 419-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-014-9873-0
  • Castagnoli M., Simoni S. 2003. Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae): survey of biological and behavioral traits of a versatile predator. Redia, 86: 153-164.
  • Chant D.A. 1956. Some mites of the sub-family Phytoseiinae (Acarina: Laelaptidae) from southeastern England, with descriptions of new species. Can. Entomol., 88: 26-37. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent8826-1
  • Chant D.A. 1957. Descriptions of some phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part. I. Nine new species from British Columbia. Part. II. Redescriptions of eight species described by Berlese. Can. Entomol., 89: 289-308. https://doi. org/10.4039/Ent89289-7
  • Chant D.A. 1959. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. Bionomics of seven species in southeastern England. Part II. A taxonomic review of the family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of 38 new species. Can. Entomol., 91: 1-166. https://doi.org/10.4039/entm9112fv
  • Chant D.A., McMurtry J.A. 1994. A review of the subfamilies Phytoseiinae and Typhlodrominae (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int. J. Acarol., 20: 223-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647959408684022
  • Chant D.A., McMurtry J.A. 2003. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part I. Neoseiulini new tribe. Int. J. Acarol., 29: 3-46. https: //doi.org/10.1080/01647950308684319
  • Chant D.A., McMurtry J.A. 2004. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part III. The tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtribe Amblyseiina n. subtribe. Int. J. Acarol., 30: 171-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950408684388
  • Chant D.A., McMurtry J.A. 2005. A review of the Subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part VI The tribe Euseiini n. tribe, subtribes Typhlodromalina n. subtribe, Euseiina n. subtribe, and Ricoseiina n. subtribe. Int. J. Acarol., 31: 187-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950508684424
  • Chant, D.A., McMurtry J.A. 2006. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part VIII. The tribes Macroseiini Chant, Denmark and Baker, Phytoseiulini n. tribe, Afroseiulini n. tribe and Indoseiulini Ehara and Amano. Int. J. Acarol., 32: 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01647950608684439
  • Chant D.A., McMurtry J.A. 2007. Illustrated keys and diagnoses for the genera and subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the world (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House, Pub Michigan: 220 pp.
  • Chant, D.A., Yoshida-Shaul E. 1982. A world review of the soleiger species group in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool., 60: 3021-3032. https://doi.org/10.1139/ z82-385
  • Chant D.A., Yoshida-Shaul E. 1983. A world review of the simplex species group in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool., 61(5), 1142-1151. https://doi.org/10. 1139/z83-151
  • Chant, D.A., Yoshida-Shaul E. 1986. A new subfamily, Cydnodromellinae, in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). Can. J. Zool., 64: 2811-2823. https://doi.org/10.1139/z86-405
  • Chant, D.A., Yoshida-Shaul E. 1987. A world review of the pyri species group in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool., 65: 1770-1804. https://doi.org/10.1139/z87-272
  • Chant D.A., Yoshida-Shaul E. 1990. The identities of Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) and A. potentillae (Garman) in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). Int. J. Acarol., 16 (1): 5-12. https: //doi.org/10.1080/01647959008683857
  • Charlet L.D., McMurtry J.A. 1977. Systematics and bionomics of predaceous and phytophagous mites associated with pine foliage in California. Hilgardia, 45: 173-236. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v45n07p173
  • Haas F., Mason P.G., Parra J.R.P. 2010. Do new access and benefit sharing procedures under the convention on biological diversity threaten the future of biological control? Biocontrol, 55: 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-009-9234-9
  • De Leon D. 1959. Seven new Tyhphlodromus from Mexico with collection notes on three other species (Acatina : Phytoseiidae). Fl. Entomol., 42: 113-121. https://doi.org/10.2307/3492606
  • De Leon D. 1965. A note on Neoseiulus Hughes 1948 and new synonymy (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash., 67: 23.
  • Demite P.R., McMurtry J.A., Moraes G.J. de. 2014. Phytoseiidae Database: a website for taxonomic and distributional information on phytoseiid mites (Acari). Zootaxa, 3795 (5): 571-577. https: //doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3795.5.6
  • Demite P.R., Moraes G.J. de, McMurtry J.A., Denmark H.A., Castilho R.C. 2023. Phytoseiidae Database. [internet] [accessed 10 March 2023]. Available from: http://www.lea.esalq.usp.br/phytoseiidae
  • Denmark H.A. 1966. Revision of the genus Phytoseius Ribaga, 1904 (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Fl. Dept. Agric. Bull., 6: 1-105.
  • Denmark H.A., Evans G.A. 2011. Phytoseiidae of North America and Hawaii (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, USA, 451 pp.
  • Denmark H.A., Muma M.H. 1989. A revision of the genus Amblyseius Berlese, 1914 (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Occasional Papers of the Florida State, USA, Collection of Arthropods, 4, 149 pp.
  • Denmark H.A., Rather A.Q. 1996. Revision of the genus Neoseiulella Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int. J. Acarol., 22: 43-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647959608684080
  • Denmark H.A., Welbourn W.C. 2002. Revision of the genera Amblydromella Muma and Anthoseius De Leon (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int. J. Acarol., 28: 291-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950208684308
  • Doker I., Kazak C., Karut K. 2019. The genus Graminaseius Chant and McMurtry (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Turkey with descriptions of two new species and re-description of Graminaseius graminis(Chant). Syst. Appl. Acarol., 24: 731-741. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.24.5.2
  • Doker I., Kazak C., Karaca M.M., Karut K. 2018. Re-discovery and identification of Iphiseius degenerans (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Turkey, based on morphological and molecular data. Turk. Biyo. Mucadele Derg., 9: 110-123. https://doi.org/10.31019/tbmd.463913
  • Dosse G. 1958. Uber einige neue Raubmilbenarten (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Pflanzen. Ber., 21: 44-61.
  • Dosse G. 1961. Zur Klarung der Artenfrage von Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) pyri Scheuten, 1857 (= T. tiliae Oud. 1929) und Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) sebutali n. sp. (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Zeit. Angew. Zool., 48: 313-323.
  • Dosse G. 1967. Schadmilben des Libanons und ihre Pradatoren. Zeit. Angew. Entomol., 59: 16-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1967.tb03837.x
  • Duso C., Vettorazzo E. 1999. Mite population dynamics on different grape varieties with or without phytoseiids released (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 23: 741-763. https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1006297225577
  • Easterbrook M.A., Fitzgerald J.D., Solomon M.G. 2001. Biological control of strawberry tarsonemid mite Phytonemus pallidus and two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on strawberry in the UK using species of Neoseiulus (Amblyseius) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 25: 25-36.
  • Ehara S. 1959. Some predatory mites of the genera Typhlodromus and Amblyseius from Japan (Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 1: 285-295.
  • Ehara S. 1966. A tentative catalogue of predatory mites of Phytoseiidae known from Asia, with descriptions of five new species from Japan. Mushi, 39: 9-30.
  • Ehara S., Amano H. 1998. A revision of the mites family Phytoseiidae in Japan (Acari: Gamasina), with remarks on its biology. Species div., 3: 25-73. https://doi.org/10.12782/specdiv.3.25
  • Ehara S., Bhandhufalck A. 1977. Phytoseiid mites of Thailand (Acarina: Mesostigmata). J. Fac. Educ. Nat. Sci. Tottori Univ., 27: 43-82.
  • Ehara S., Okada Y., Kato H. 1994. Contribution to the knowledge of the mite family Phytoseiidae in Japan (Acari: Gamasina). J. Fac. Educ. Nat. Sci. Tottori Univ., 42: 119-160.
  • El-Badry E.A. 1967a. Five new phytoseiid mites from U.A.R., with collection notes on three other species (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Ind. J. Entomol., 29: 177-184.
  • El-Badry, E.A. 1967b. Three new species of phytoseiid mites preying on the cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in the Sudan (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Entomol., 100: 106-111.
  • El-Badry E.A. 1968. Three new species of phytoseiid mites from western Sudan. Rev. Zool. Bot. Afric., 77: 321-328.
  • El-Badry E.A. 1970. Taxonomic review of the phytoseiid mites of Egypt. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Egypte,
  • El-Wakeil N., Gaafar N., Sallam A., Volkmar C. 2013. Side effects of insecticides on natural enemies and possibility of their integration in plant protection strategies. In: S. Trdan (Ed.), Insecticides- Development of safer and more effective technologies: 1-54. Rijeka, Croatia: Intech. https: //doi.org/10.5772/54199
  • Escudero L.A., Ferragut F. 2004. Life-history of predatory mites Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on four spider mite species as prey, with special reference to Tetranychus evansi(Acari: Tetranychidae). Bio. Cont., 32: 378-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol. 2004.12.010
  • Evans G.O. 1952. A new typhlodromid mite predaceous on Tetranychus bimaculatus Harvey in Indonesia. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 5: 413-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222935208654311
  • Evans G.O. 1987. The status of three species of Phytoseiidae (Acari) described by Carl Willmann. J. Nat. Hist., 21: 1461-1467. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938700770921
  • Fang X.D., Nguyenb V.L., Ouyanga G.C., Wua W.-N. 2020. Survey of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata, Phytoseiidae) in citrus orchards and a key for Amblyseiinae in Vietnam. Acarologia, 60: 254-267. https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20204366
  • Faraji F., Shiroodbakhshi M., Ostovan H., MC Murtry J.A. 2007. Redescription of the female of Paraseiulus triporus and Proprioseiopsis dacus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) based on material collected from citrus in northern Iran. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 12: 199-204. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.12.3.4
  • Ferragut F. 2018. New records of phytoseiid mites of the subfamilies Typhlodrominae and Phytoseiinae (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Spain, with description of a new species and re-description of four species of Typhlodromus Scheuten. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 23: 883-910. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.23.5.8
  • Ferragut F., Costa J., Gomez-Bemardo E., GarciaMari F. 1985. Contribucion al conocimiento de los acaros fitoseidos (Gamasida: Phytoseiidae) de los cultivos espafioles. Actas do II Congreso Iberico Entomol. Lisboa: 223-231.
  • Ferragut F., Costa-Comelles J., Garcia-Mari F. 1988. Population dynamics of the phytoseiid Euseius stipulatus (Athias-Henriot) and its prey Panonychus citri (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae), in Spanish citrus. Bol. San. Veg., Plagas, 4: 45-54.
  • Ferragut F., Escudero A. 1997. Nuevos datos de la distribucion de las especies lbericas Del genero Euseius Wainstein, 1962 (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Bol. Asoc. Esp. Entomol., 21(1-2): 99-100.
  • Ferragut F., Garcia Mari F., Costa-Comelles J., Laborda R. 1987. Influence of food and temperature on development and oviposition of Euseius stipulatus and Typhlodromus phialatus. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 3: 317-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193168
  • Ferragut F., Garcia-Mari F., Marzal M.C. 1983. Determinacion y abundancia de los fitoseidos (Acari: Phytoseiidae) en los agrios espanoles. I. Congreso Nacional de la Sociedad Espanola de Ciencias Horticolas, Valencia, 28 Noviembre a 1 Diciembre de 1983, Spain: 299-308.
  • Ferragut F., Laborda R., Costa-Comelles J., Garcia-Mari F. 1992. Feeding behaviour of Euseius stipulatus and Typhlodromus phialatus on the citrus red mite Panonychus citri (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae). Entomophaga, 37: 537-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372323
  • Ferragut F., Perez Moreno I., Iraola V., Escudero A. 2010. Acaros depredadores em las plantas cultivadas. Familia Phytoseiidae. Ediciones Agrotecnicas, Madrid, 202 pp.
  • Fitzgerald J., Xu X.M., Pepper N., Easterbrook M., Solomon M. 2008. The spatial and temporal distribution of predatory and phytophagous mites in field-grown strawberry in the UK. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 44: 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-008-9151-0
  • Fraulo A.B., McSorley R., Liburd O.E. 2008. Effect of the Biological Control Agent Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Arthropod Community Structure in North Florida Strawberry Fields. Fla. Entomol., 91: 436-445. https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2008)91%5B436:EOTBCA%5D2.0.CO?2
  • Garman P. 1958. New species belonging to the genera Amblyseius and Amblyseiopsis with keys to Amblyseius, Amblyseiopsis, and Phytoseiulus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 51: 69-79. https: //doi.org/10.1093/aesa/51.1.69
  • Gomez-Moya C.A., Ferragut F. 2009. Spatial distribution pattern and efficacy of Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in the control of red spider mites on vegetables under semi-field conditions. Bol. San. Veg., Plagas, 35: 377-390.
  • Gonzalez-Dominguez S.G., Santillan-Galicia M.T., Gonzalez-Hernandez V., Suarez Espinosa J., Gonzalez-Hernandez H. 2015. Variability in Damage Caused by the Mite Tetranychus urticae (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) Koch on Three Varieties of Strawberry. J. Econ. Entomol., 108: 1371-1380. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tov084
  • Grissa L.K., Khoufi A. 2012. Bio-ecology of phytophagous mites on Citrus. 7th EURAAC Symposium Vienna-Austria, abstracts: 92.
  • Guanilo A.D., Moraes G.J. de, Knapp M. 2008a. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma from Peru, with description of four new species. Zootaxa, 1880: 1-47. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1880.1.1
  • Guanilo A.D., Moraes G.J. de, Toledo S., Knapp M. 2008b. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Argentina, with description of a new species. Zootaxa, 1884: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1884. 1.1
  • Gupta S.K. 1969. Three new species of the genus Amblyseius Berlese (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from West Bengal, Ind. Bull. Entomol., 10(2): 126-129.
  • Gupta S.K. 1977. Some undescribed and little-known species of Amblyseius (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from western and northern India. Ind. J. Acarol., 1: 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647957508683746
  • Gupta S.K. 1985. Plant mites of India. Zooogical Survey of India Handbook Series, Calcutta, India, 5: 1-520.
  • Gupta S.K. 1986. Fauna of India (Acari: Mesostigmata) Family Phytoseiidae. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, India, 350 pp.
  • Gupta S.K. 2003. A monograph on plant inhabiting predatory mites of India. Part II: Order: Mesostigmata. Memoirs, 20: 1-185.
  • Gutierrez J. 1985. Mounting techniques, In: Helle W, Sabelis MW (eds) Spider mites, their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, vol 1A. Amsterdam, pp. 351-353.
  • Hare J.D., Phillips P.A. 1992. Economic effect of the citrus red mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) on southern California coastal lemons. J. Econ. Entomol., 85: 1926-1932. https: //doi.org/10.1093/jee/85.5.1926
  • Hajizadeh J., Faraji F. Rafatifardf M., Kamranfard F. 2010. The genus Paragigagnathus Amitai and Grinberg (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Iran, with a key to the known species. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 15: 222-227. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.15.3.6
  • Hajizadeh J., Hosseini R., McMurtry J.A. 2002. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) associated with eriophyid mites (Acari: Eriophydae) in Guilan province of Iran. Int. J. Acarol., 28: 373-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647950208684313
  • Hirschmann W. 1962. Gangystematik der Parasitiformes. Acarologie Schriftenreihe fur Vergleichende Milbenkunde, Hirschmann-Verlag, Furth/Bay, 5(5-6), 80 pp.+ 32 plates.
  • Hughes A.M. 1948. The mites associated with stored food products. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, H. M. Stationary Office, London, 168 pp.
  • Howarth F.G. 1991. Environmental impacts of classical biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 36: 485-509. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.002413
  • Kanouh M., Kreiter S., Douin M., Tixier M.-S. 2012. Revision of the genus Neoseiulella Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Re-description of species, synonymy assessment, biogeography, plant supports and key to adult females. Acarologia, 52: 259-348. https://doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/20122048
  • Kanouh M., Tixier M.-S., Guichou S., Cheval B., Kreiter S. 2010. Two synonymy cases within the genus Neoseiulella (Acari: Phytoseiidae): is the molecular evidence so evident? Biol. J. Linnean Soc., 101: 323-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01516.x
  • Karg W. 1983. Systematische untersuchung der Gattungen und Untergattungen der Raubmilbenfamilie Phytoseiidae Berlese, 1916, mit der beschreibung von 8 neuen Arten. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 59(2): 293-328. https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnz.4830590203
  • Karg W. 1991. Die Raubmilbenarten der Phytoseiidae Berlese (Acarina) Mitteleuropas sowie angrenzen- der Gebiete. Zool. Jahrb. Syst., 118: 1-64.
  • Karg W. 1993. Acari (Acarina), Milben, Parasitiformes (Anactinochaeta), Cohorts Gamasina Leach, Raubmilben, Die Tierwelt Deutschlands, 59: 1-523.
  • Karmakar K., Bhowmik S., Sherpa C. 2017. Description of five new species and re-description of two species of Amblyseius (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from West Bengal, India. Zootaxa, 4311 (1): 039-061. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4311.1.3
  • Kasap ˙C., Sekeroglu E. 2004. Life history of Euseius scutalis feeding on citrus red mite Panonychus citri at various temperatures. BioControl, 49: 645-654. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BICO.0000046733.53887.2b
  • Kazak C., Yildiz S., Sekeroglu E. 2002. Biological characteristics and life tables of Neoseiulus umbraticus Chant (Acari, Phytoseiidae) at three constant temperatures. Anz. Schadl., 75: 118-121. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-8206.2002.02034.x
  • Kennett C.E., Caltagirone L.E. 1968. Biosystematics of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 10: 563-577.
  • Kim H.-Y., Lee Y.-H., Kim J.-H., KimY.-H. 2008. Comparison on the capability of four predatory mites to prey on the eggs of Bemisia tabaci(Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Kor. J. Appl. Entomol., 47: 429-433. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2008.47.4.429
  • Knisley C.B., Denmark H.A. 1978. New phytoseiid mites from successional and climax plants communities in New Jersey. Fl. Entomol., 61: 5-7. https://doi.org/10.2307/3494423
  • Kolodochka L.A. 1989. A revision of the phytoseiid mites of the genus Pamiroseius Wain. (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae). Entomolo. Oboz., 68: 221-229.
  • Kolodochka L.A. 1994. A revision of the genus Paragigagnathus(Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Part 1. History and a new concept of the genus (In Russian, English summary). J. Ukrain. Entomol. Soc., 2: 3-8.
  • Kreiter S., Amiri K., Douin M., Bohinc T., Trdan S., Tixier M.-S. 2020a. Phytoseiid mites of Slovenia (Acari: Mesostigmata): new records and first description of the male of Amblyseius microorientalis. Acarologia, 60: 203-242. https://doi. org/10.24349/acarologia/20204364
  • Kreiter S., Tixier M.-S., Auger P., Muckensturm N., Sentenac G., Doublet B., Weber M. 2000. Phytoseiid mites of vineyards in France (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 41(1-2): 77-96.
  • Kreiter S., Auger P., Grissa K.L., Tixier M.-S., Chermiti B., Dali M. 2002. Plant inhabiting mites (Acari: Prostigmata and Mesostigmata) of some northern Tunisian crops. Acarologia, 42: 389-402.
  • Kreiter S., Fontaine O., Payet R.-M. 2018. New records of Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Mauritius. Acarologia, 58: 773-785. https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20184273
  • Kreiter S., Payet R.-M., Douin M., Fontaine O., Fillatre J., Le Bellec F. 2020b. Phytoseiidae of La Reunion Island (Acari: Mesostigmata): three new species and two males described, New synonymies, and new records. Acarologia, 60 (1): 111-195. https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20184273
  • Kreiter S., Tixier M.-S., Allam L. 2007. The diversity of phytoseiid mite communities in the Maghreb comparisons with the fauna of one of the Canary Islands. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol., 37: 381-394.
  • Kreiter S., Tixier M.-S., Auger P., Weber M. 2001. Phytoseiid mites of vineyards in France. Acarologia, 41: 75-94.
  • Kreiter S., Tixier M.-S., Bourgeois T. 2003. Do generalist phytoseiid mites (Gamasida: Phytoseiidae) have interactions with host plants? Ins. Sci. Appl., 23: 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400012236
  • Kreiter S., Tixier M.-S., Ferragut F., Allam L., Lebdi K.G. 2004. Preliminary observations of the diversity of phytoseiid mites in the Maghreb and comparasons to the fauna of Gran Canaria. Phytophaga, 14: 477-484.
  • Kreiter S., Tixier M.-S., Sahraoui H., Lebdi K.G., Ben Chaabane S., Chatti A., Chermiti B., Khoualdia O., Ksantini M. 2010. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Tunisia: Catalogue, biogeography and key for identification. Tun. J. Plant Prot., 5: 151-178.
  • Kreiter S., Vicente V., Tixier M.-S., Fontaine O. 2016a. An unexpected occurrence of Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot in La Reunion Island (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 56 (2): 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/20162254
  • Kreiter S., Vicente V., Tixier M.-S., Fontaine O., Avril I., Cottineau J.-S., Fillatre J. 2016b. Presence inattendue d' Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot a l'Ile de La Reunion. Phytoma-La sante des vegetaux, 695: 38-42.
  • Lamharchi E.H., Akchour A., Zahidi A., El Mousadik A. 2016. Control of spring generation of Aonidiella aurantii(Hemiptera, Diaspididae) citrus pest in Souss region. The 3rd International American Moroccan Agricultural Sciences Conference - AMAS Conference III? December 13-16, 2016, Ouarzazate, Morocco.
  • Lamharchi E.H., Zahidi A., Akchour A., Hallouti A., Bouharroud R., El Mousadik A. 2020a. Alternatives au chlorpyriphos pour le controle du pou de Californie Aonidiella aurantii(Hemiptera: Diaspididae) en verger d'agrumes. Intern. J. Innov. Appl. Stud., 29: 104-112. https: //doi.org/10.3923/je.2020.48.57
  • Lamharchi E.H., Zahidi A., Hallouti A., Akchour A., El Finti A., Boubaker H., El Mousadik A. 2020b. Biological Control of Aonidiella aurantii(Hemiptera-Diaspididae) by the entomopathogenic fungi Aspergilllus flavus and Fusarium oxysporum. J. Entomol., 17: 48-57. https://doi.org/10.3923/je.2020.48.
  • Lara L., Cano M., Salvador E., Tellez M.M. 2012. Evaluacion de la eficacia de Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) en el control biologico de Aculops lycopersici (Massee) en cultivo de tomate de invernadero. Bol. Sanid. Veg., Plagas, 38: 203-211.
  • Ledesma C., Vela J.M., Wong E., Jacas J.A., Boyero J.R., 2011. Population dynamics of the citrus oriental mite, Eutetranychus orientalis (Klein) (Acari: Tetranychidae), and its mite predatory complex in southern Spain. IOBC/WPRS Bull., 62: 83-92.
  • Lombardini G. 1959. Acari Nuovi. XXXVII. Boll. Ist. Entomol. Agr., Univ. Palermo ed Osserv. Region. Malattie Piante, 21: 163-167.
  • Mazih A. 2008. Current situation of Citrus pests and the control methods in use in Morocco Integrated Control in Citrus Fruit Crops, IOBC/wprs Bull., 38: 10-16.
  • Mazih, A. 2015. Status of Citrus IPM in the Southern Mediterranean Basin Morocco, North Africa. Proc. XIIth Intl. Citrus Congress Eds.: B. Sabater-Munoz et al. Acta Hort, 1065, ISHS.
  • McGregor E.A. 1954. Two new mites in the genus Typhlodromus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci., 3: 89-92.
  • McMurtry J.A., Bounfour M. 1989. Phytoseiid mites of Morocco, with descriptions of two new species and notes on the genera Kuzinellus , Typhloctonus and Typhlodromus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 30: 13-24.
  • McMurtry J.A., Croft B.A. 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 42: 291-321. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.291
  • McMurtry J.A., Huffaker C.B., Van De Vrie M. 1970. Ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural enemies: a review. I. Tetranychid enemies: their biological characters and the impact of spray practices. Hilgardia, 40: 331-390. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v40n11p331
  • McMurtry J.A., Moraes G.J. de. 1984. Some phytoseiid mites from the south pacific, with descriptions of new species ano a definition of the Amblyseius largoensis species group. Int. J. Acarol., 10 (1): 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647958408683347
  • McMurtry J.A., Moraes G.J. de, Sourassou N.F. 2013. Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 18: 297-320. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.18.4.1
  • Meck E.D., Walgenbach J.F., Kennedy G.G. 2009. Effect of vegetation management on autumn dispersal of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) from tomato. J. Appl. Entomol., 133, 742-748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01413.x
  • Messelink G.J., Van Steenpaal S.E.F., Ramakers P.M.J. 2006. Evaluation of phytoseiid predators for control of western flower thrips on greenhouse cucumber. BioControl, 51: 753-768. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10526-006-9013-9
  • McGill E.J. 1939. The gamasid mite ( Typhlodromus thripsi n.sp.) a predator of Thrips tabaci Lind. Ann. Appl. Biol. 26: 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1939.tb06973.x
  • Momen F., El-Borolossy M., 2010. Juvenile survival and development in three phytoseiid species (Acari: Phytoseiidae) feeding on con- and heterospecific immatures. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung., 45: 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1556/APhyt.45.2010.2.12
  • Moraes G.J. de, Kreiter S., Lofego A.C. 2000. Plant mites (Acari) of the French Antilles. 3. Phytoseiidae (Gamasida). Acarologia, 40: 237-264.
  • Moraes G.J. de, Lopes P.C., Fernando C.P. 2004b. Phytoseiid mite (Acari: Phytoseiidae) of coconut growing areas in Sri Lanka, with descriptions of three new species. J. Acarol. Soc. Japan, 13: 141-160. https://doi.org/10.2300/acari.13.141
  • Moraes G.J., McMurtry J.A., Denmark H.A. 1986. A catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. References to Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution and Habitat. Embrapa ed. and Pub., Brasilia, 353 pp.
  • Moraes G.J de, McMurtry J.A., Denmark H.A., Campos C.B. 2004a. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa, 434: 1-494. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.434.1.1
  • Moraes G.J. de, Ueckermann E.A., Oliveira A.R., Yaninek J.S. 2001. Phytoseiid mites of the genus Euseius (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Sub-Saharan Africa. Zootaxa, 3: 1-70. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3.1.1
  • Moraes G.J. de, McMurtry J.A., van den Berg H., Yaninek J.S. 1989. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) of Kenya, with descriptions of five new species and complementary descriptions of eight species. Intern. J. Acarol., 15(2): 79-93. https: //doi. org/10.1080/01647958908683829
  • Moyano R.A., Pina T., Ferragut F., Urbaneja A. 2009. Comparative life-history traits of three phytoseiid mites associated with Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) colonies in clementine orchards in eastern Spain: implications for biological control. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 47: 121-132. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10493-008-9197-z
  • Muma M.H. 1955. Phytoseiidae (Acarina) associated with citrus in Florida. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 48: 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/48.4.262
  • Muma M.H. 1961. Subfamilies, genera, and species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Fla.
  • Muma M.H. 1967. New Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from southern Asia. Fl. Entomol., 50: 267-280. https://doi.org/10.2307/3493156
  • Muma M.H., Denmark H.A. 1970. Phytoseiidae of Florida. Arthropods of Florida and neighboring land areas, 6. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, USA, 150 pp.
  • Naranjo S.E. 2001. Conservation and evaluation of natural enemies in IPM systems for Bemisia tabaci. Crop Prot., 20: 835-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00115-6
  • Narayanan E.S., Kaur R.B. 1960. Two new species of the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten from India (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Proceed. Ind. Acad. Sc., 51B: 1-8.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03050263
  • Nasr A.K., Abou-Awad B.A. 1985. A new species of genus Amblyseius Berlese from Egypt (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Bull. Soc. Entomol. Egypte, 65, 245-249.
  • Navia D., Gondim M.G.C. Jr, Moraes G.J. de, 2007. Eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) associated with palm trees. Zootaxa, 1389: 1-30. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1389.1.1
  • Nicotina M., Cioffi E. 1999. Phytoseiid mites (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae) associated with vines in Basilicata Region south Italy. Boll. Lab. Entomol. Agr. Filippo Silvestri, 55: 9-13.
  • Nomikou M., Janssen A., Schraag R., Sabelis M.W. 2001. Phytoseiid predators as potential biological control agents for Bemisia tabaci. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 25: 271-291. https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1017976725685
  • Nomikou M., Janssen A., Schraag R., Sabelis M.W. 2002. Phytoseiid predators suppress populations of Bemisia tabaci on cucumber plants with alternative food. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 27: 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021559421344
  • Nwilene F.E., Nachman G. 1996. Functional responses of Iphiseius degenerans and Neoseiulus teke (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to changes in the density of the cassava green mite, Mononychellus tanajoa (Acari: Tetranychidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 20: 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052876
  • Oudemans A.C. 1930. Acarologische Aanteekeningen. CII. Entomol. Ber., 8: 69-74.
  • Papadoulis G., Emmanouel N.G., Kapaxidi E.V. 2009. Phytoseiidae of Greece and Cyperus, Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, Michigan, USA, pp. 24-171.
  • Papaioannou-Souliotis P., Markoyiannaki-Printziou D., Rumbos I., Adamopoulos I. 1999. Phytoseiid mites associated with vine in various provinces of Greece: a contribution to faunistics and biogeography, with reference to eco-ethological aspects of Phytoseius finitimus (Ribaga) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 40: 112-125.
  • Papaioannou-Souliotis P., Ragusa di Chiara S., Tsolakis C. 1994. Phytophagous mites and their predators observed on cultivated plants in Greece during 1975-1990. Ann. Inst. Phytopathol. Benaki, N.S., 17: 35-86.
  • Pritchard A.E., Baker E.W. 1962. Mites of the family Phytoseiidae from Central Africa, with remarks on genera of the world. Hilgardia, 33: 205-309. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v33n07p205
  • Porath A., Swirski E. 1965. A survey of phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on citrus, with a description of one new species. Israel J. Agric. Res., 15: 87-100.
  • Puchalska E., Zagrodzki S.K., Kozak M., Rector B.G., Mauer A. 2021. A Preliminary Assessment of Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) as a Potential Biocontrol Agent against Phytophagous Mites Occurring on Coniferous Plants. Insects, 12: 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080664
  • Ragusa S. 2006. Phytoseiid mites (Parasitiformes Phytoseiidae) of some Eptanissan Islands (Greece). Redia, 89: 1-7.
  • Ragusa S., Swirski E. 1976. Notes on predacious mites of Italy, with a description of two new species and of an unknown male (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Redia, 59: 179-196.
  • Ragusa S., Swirski, E. 1978. Description of three new species of Typhlodromus Scheuten from Italy with redescription of Typhlodromus baccettii Lombardini (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int. J. Acarol., 4: 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647957808683118
  • Ragusa S., Swirski E. 1981. A new species of the genus Seiulus(Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from Italy. Redia, 64: 269-276.
  • Ramadan H.A.I., El-Banhawy E.M., Afia S.I. (2009) On the identification of a taxa collected from Egypt in the species sub-group andersoni: morphological relationships with related species and molecular analysis of inter and intra-specific variations (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 49: 115-120.
  • Rhodes E.M., Liburd O.E. 2005. Predatory Mite,Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Arachnida: Acari: Phytoseiidae). University of Florida, publication EENY, 359: 01- 04. https://doi.org/10.32473/ edis-in639-2005
  • Ribaga C. 1904. Gamasidi planticoli. Riv. Patol. Veg., 10: 175-178.
  • Rodriguez H., Ramos M. 2004. Biology and feeding behavior of Amblyseius largoensis(Muma) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) (Acari: Tarsonemidae). Rev Protec. Vegetal, 19:73-79.
  • Rodriguez-Reina J.M., Garcia-Mari F., Ferragut F. 1992. Predatory activity of phytoseiid mites on different developmental stages of the Western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis. Bol. San. Veg. Plagas, 18: 253-263.
  • Romeih A.H.M., Abo-Shnaf R.I.A., Hassan M.F., Rizk M.A. 2010. Description of a new phytoseiid mite species (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Egypt with a special reference to its biology. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sc., 3 (2): 27-36 [ The first International Conference of Biological Sciences, 27-29-September, 2010 Cairo-Egypt] https://doi.org/10.21608/eajbsa.2010.15185
  • Rowell H.J., Chant D.A., Hansell R.I.C. 1978. The determination of setal homologies and setal patterns on the dorsal shield in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Can. Entomol., 110: 859-876. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent110859-8
  • Saba F. 1978. Selection of pesticides for integrated pest control programmes in Moroccan citrus. Z. Ang. Entomol., 86: 443-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1978.tb01950.x
  • Sahraoui H., Lebdi Grissa K., Kreiter S., Douin M., Tixier M.-S. 2012. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) of Tunisian Citrus orchards. Acarologia, 52: 433-452. https://doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/ 20122072
  • Scheuten A. 1857. Einiges uber Milben. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, 23: 104-112
  • Schicha E. 1976. The undescribed male of Amblyseius belinus (Womersley), and females of the latter and A. cucumeris (Oudemans) redescribed (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Z. Ang. Zool., 63: 333-42.
  • Schicha E. 1987. Phytoseiidae of Australia and neighboring areas. Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, Michigan, USA, 187 pp.
  • Schuster R.O., Pritchard A.E. 1963. Phytoseiid mites of California. Hilgardia, 34: 191-285. https: //doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v34n07p191
  • Schweizer J. 1922. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der terrestrischen Milbenfauna der Schweiz. Verh. Natur. Gesell. Basel, 33: 23-112. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.3644
  • Schweizer J. 1949. Die Landmilben des Schweizerischen Nationalparkes. I. Teil: Parasitiformes Reuter, 1909. Ergebnisse der Wissenschaftlichen Untersuchungen im Schweizerischen National park, 2: 1-99.
  • Sengonca C., Drescher K. 2001. Laboratory studies on the suitability of Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) as prey for the development, longevity, reproduction and predation of four predatory mite species of the genus Amblyseius (Acari, Phytoseiidae). Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzensc., 108: 66-76.
  • Swirski E., Amitai S. 1961. Some phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) of Israel, with a description of two new species. Israel J. Agric. Res., 11: 193-202.
  • Swirski E., Amitai S. 1984. Notes on phytoseiid mites (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) from the Mediterranean littoral zone of Israel, with a description of a new species of Typhloctonus. Israel J. Entomol., 18: 71-82.
  • Swirski E., Amitai S. 1990. Notes on phytoseiid mites (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) from the Sea of Galilee region of Israel, with a description of a new species of Amblyseius. Israel J. Entomol., 24: 115-124.
  • Swirski E., Amitai S. 1997a. Notes on phytoseiid mites (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) of Mt. Carmel (Israel), with descriptions of two new species. Israel J. Entomol., 31: 1-20.
  • Swirski E., Amitai S. 1997b. Annotated list of phytoseiid mites (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) in Israel. Israel J. Entomol., 31: 21-46.
  • Swirski E., Ragusa S. 1977. Some predacious mites of Greece, with a description of one new species (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae). Phytoparasitica, 5: 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981145
  • Swirski E., Ragusa D.I., Salvatore C., Tsolakis H. 1998. Keys to the Phytoseiid Mites. Phytophaga , 8: 85-154.
  • Takahashi F., Chant D.A. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Phytoseiulus Evans. I. Geographic distribution. Int. J. Acarol., 19: 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647959308683534
  • Tixier M.-S., Allam L., Douin M., Kreiter S., 2016. Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) of Morocco: new records, descriptions of five new species, re-descriptions of two species, and key for identification. Zootaxa, 4067: 501-551. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4067.5.1
  • Tixier M.-S., Baldassar A., Duso C., Kreiter S. 2013. Phytoseiidae in European grape ( Vitis vinifera L.): bio-ecological aspects and keys to species (Acari: Mesostigmata). Zootaxa, 3721: 101-142. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3721.2.1
  • Tixier M.-S., Guichou S., Kreiter S. 2008. Morphological variation in the biological control agent Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae): consequences for diagnostic reliability and synonymies. Invert. Syst., 22: 453-469. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS07052
  • Tixier M.-S., Klaric V., Kreiter S., Duso C. 2010. Phytoseiid Mite Species from Croatia, with Description of a New Species of the Genus Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 103: 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1603/AN09092
  • Tixier M.-S., Kreiter S., Allam L., Ouahbi A., Hmimina H. 2003. Phytoseiid and tetranychid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) of some Moroccan crops. Acarologia, 43: 87-97.
  • Tixier M.-S., Kreiter S., Auger P., Weber M. 1998. Colonization of Languedoc vineyards by phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae): influence of wind and crop environment. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 22: 523-542.
  • Tixier M.-S., Kreiter S., Okassa M., Cheval B. 2009. A new species of the genus Euseius Wainstein (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from France. J. Nat. Hist., 44: 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930903383529
  • Tixier M.-S., Otto J., Kreiter S., Santos V.D., Beard J. 2014. Is Neoseiulus wearnei the Neoseiulus californicus of Australia? Exp. Appl. Acarol., 62: 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-013-9740-4
  • Tsolakis H., Ragusa E., Ragusa di Chiara S. 2000. Distribution of phytoseiid mites (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae) on hazelnut at two different altitudes in Sicily (Italy). Environ. Entomol., 29: 1251- 1257. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-29.6.1251
  • Tsolakis H., Sinacori M., Ragusa S. 2013. Predation of Typhlodromus longilaterus Athias-Henriot (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae) females on eggs and juveniles of the tetranychid mites Tetranychus urticae (Koch) and Panonychus citri (McGregor) (Acariformes, Tetranychidae). IOBC/WPRS Bull., 93: 129-132.
  • Tsolakis H., Sinacori M., Ragusa E., Lombardo A. 2019. Biological parameters of Neoseiulus longilaterus (Athias-Henriot) (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae) fed on prey and pollen in laboratory conditions. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 24 (9): 1757-1768. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.24.9.12
  • Tuovinen T., Lindqvist I. 2010. Maintenance of predatory phytoseiid mites for preventive control of strawberry tarsonemid mite Phytonemus pallidus in strawberry plant propagation. Biol. Cont., 54: 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.04.006
  • Ueckermann E.A. 1992. Some Phytoseiidae of the Cape Verde Islands (Acari: Mesostigmata). Phytophylactica, 24: 145-155.
  • Ueckermann E.A., Loots G.C. 1988. The African species of the subgenera Anthoseius De Leon and Amblyseius Berlese (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Entomol. Mem. Dep. Agric. Water Supply, Rep. South Afr., 73: 1-168.
  • Van Rijn P.C.J., Tanigoshi L.K. 1999. Pollen as food for the predatory mites Iphiseius degenerans and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae): dietary range and life history. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 23: 785-802. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006227704122
  • Vantornhout I., Minnaert H.L., Tirry L., De Clercq P. 2004. Effect of pollen, natural prey and factitious prey on the development of Iphiseius degenerans. BioControl, 49: 627-644. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10526-004-5280-5
  • Vantornhout I., Minnaert H.L., Tirry L., De Clercq P. 2005. Influence of diet on life table parameters of Iphiseius degenerans (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 35: 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10493-004-3940-x
  • Wainstein B.A. 1959. New subgenus and species of the genus Phytoseius Ribaga, 1902 (Phytoseiidae: Parasitiformes). Zool. Zh., 38: 1361-1365.
  • Wainstein B.A. 1962. Revision du genre Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857 et systematique de la famille des Phytoseiidae (Berlese 1916) (Acarina: Parasitiformes). Acarologia, 4: 5-30.
  • Wainstein B.A. 1973. Predatory mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Parasitiformes) of the fauna of the Moldovan SSR, In: Yaroshenko M.F. et al. (eds.) Fauna and Biology of Moldavian Insects. Kishinev, Shtuntza, 176-180.
  • Wainstein B.A. 1975. Predatory mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Parasitiformes) of Yaroslav province. Entomol. Obozr., 54: 914-922.
  • Wainstein B.A. 1976. A new tribe of the family Phytoseiidae (Parasitiformes). Zool. Zh., 55: 696-700 [in Russian].
  • Wainstein B.A. 1977. A contribution to the fauna of the family Phytoseiidae (Parasitiformes) in Australia. Zool. Zh., 56: 1413-1416.
  • Wainstein B.A., Vartapetov S.G. 1973. Predatory mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Parasitiformes)
  • Walter D.E. 1992. Leaf surface structure and the distribution of Phytoseius mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in south-eastern Australian forests. Aust. J. Zool., 40: 593-603. https://doi. org/10.1071/ZO9920593
  • Walter D.E. 1996. Living on leaves: mites, tomenta, and leaf domatia. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 41:101-114. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.000533
  • Westerboer I., Bernhard F. 1963. Die Familie Phytoseiidae Berlese 1916. In: Stammer H. (ed. from Kreiter et al. 2010). Beitrage Zur Systematik und Okologie Mitteleuropaischer Acarina. Band II, Mesostigmata I, Germany: 451-791.
  • Willmann G. 1949. Beitrage zur Kenntnis des Salzgebietes von Ciechocinek. 1. Milben aus den Salzwiesen und Salzmooren von Ciechocinek an dor Weichsel. Veroeffentlichungen aus dem Museum fuer Naturkunde Bremen: 100-142.
  • Womersley H. 1954. Species of the subfamily Phytoseiinae (Acarina: Laelaptidae) from Australia. Austral. J. Zool., 2: 169-191. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO9540169
  • Wu W.N., Ou J.F., Huang J.L. 2009. Fauna Sinica, Invertebrate Vol. 47, Arachnida, Acari, Phytoseiidae. Beijing: Science Press, 511 pp. [in Chinese].
  • Wysoki M., Bolland H.R. 1983. Chromosome studies of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Gamasida). Int. J. Acarol., 9: 91-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647958308683319
  • Yousef A.T.A. 1974. A new genus of the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Parasitoidea). Bull. Soc. Entomol. Egypte, 58: 381-383.
  • Yousef A.T.A. 1980. Morphology and biology of Typhlodormus africanus n. sp. (Acarina: Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 22: 121-125.
  • Zaher M.A. 1986. Predaceous and nonphytophagous mites (Nile Valley and Delta). Text. Survey and ecological studies on phytophagous, predaceous and soil mites in Egypt. PL 480 Programme USA, Project EG_ARS_30, Grant No. FG_EG_139, Egypt, 567 pp.
  • Zaher M.A., Shehata K.K. 1970. A new typhlodromid mite Typhlodromus tetramedius. Bull. Soc. Entomol. d'Egypte, 54:117-121.
  • Zannou I.D., Hanna R. 2011. Clarifying the identity of Amblyseius swirskii and Amblyseius rykei (Acari: Phytoseiidae): are they two distinct species or two populations of one species? Exp. Appl. Acarol., 53: 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-010-9412-6