Published February 20, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Three brown frog species in Denmark have different abilities to colonise new ponds

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Unaffiliated, Veksø, Denmark

Description

For 29 consecutive years, the populations of three species of brown frogs, Rana arvalis, R. dalmatina and R. temporaria, were monitored in an open area in South Zealand, Denmark, with no direct influence of agriculture. Population sizes were recorded by counting egg clumps and showed large variations from year to year. The total population of R. arvalis differed by a factor of 100 between the years with the lowest and the highest numbers. A total of 19 initially unoccupied suitable waterbodies could potentially be colonised by the frogs. Rana dalmatina colonised all of the ponds, mostly in the very first year of existence. Rana arvalis colonised 17 ponds after an average of 10.5 years. Rana temporaria colonised eight ponds after an average of 13.4 years. Colonisation by R. dalmatina was independent of changes in total population size, whereas colonisation by R. arvalis predominantly occurred in years with considerable population increases. The results are discussed in relation to the movement patterns and philopatry of juvenile frogs of the three species. Juvenile R. dalmatina disperse far from the breeding site, but most individuals return to their natal site. This allows the species to be an efficient coloniser of new waterbodies and, at the same time, to have stable occurrence at the original site. The two other species show a more erratic type of dispersal and especially R. temporaria often shifts breeding site from year to year.

Files

Herpetozoa_article_107986.pdf

Files (2.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5e4714d3a50c6e3dfc4639f0848faabf
2.0 MB Preview Download

System files (157.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:57def057207d4dcbeadd679633143b33
157.5 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Ahlén I (2013) Åtgärdsprogram för långbensgroda, 2013–2017 (Rana dalmatina). Rapport 6586, Naturvårdsverket, 42 pp.
  • Almhagen J (2007) Anuran colonization of newly constructed ponds: The importance of time and distance to source populations. Master thesis in applied ecology, University of Halmstad, School of Business and Engineering, 23 pp.
  • Băncilă RI, Ozgul A, Hartel T, Sos T, Schmidt BR (2016) Direct negative density-dependence in a pond-breeding frog population. Ecography 39: 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01584
  • Bringsøe H, Graff H (Eds) (1995) Bevarelsen af Danmarks padder og krybdyr. Jubilæumsskrift for Nordisk Herpetologisk Forening: 1944–1994, 133 pp.
  • Canova L, Balestrieri A (2018) Long-term monitoring of the endemic Rana latastei: suggestions for after-LIFE management. Oryx 52: 709–717. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317001879
  • Combes M, Pinaud D, Barbraud C, Trotignon J, Brischoux F (2018) Climatic influences on the breeding biology of the agile frog (Rana dalmatina). The Science of Nature 105: 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-017-1530-0
  • Denoël M, Dalleur S, Langrand E, Cayuela H (2018) Dispersal and alternative breeding site fidelity strategies in an amphibian. Ecography 41: 1543–1555. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03296
  • Falaschi M, Gibertine C, Parrino EL, Muraro M, Barzaghi B, Manenti R, Ficetola GF (2022) Assessing population trends of species with imperfect detection: double count analyses and simulations confirm reliable estimates in brown frogs. Animals 12(16): 2085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162085
  • Fog K (1988) Reinvestigation of 1300 amphibian localities recorded in the 1940s. Memoranda Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 64: 134–135.
  • Fog K (1997a) A survey of the results of pond projects for rare amphibians in Denmark. Memoranda Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 73: 91–100.
  • Fog K (1997b) Zur Verbreitung des Springfrosches in Dänemark. Rana Sonderheft 2: 23–34.
  • Fog K (2008) Determination of newly metamorphosed froglets of the brown frogs Rana arvalis, R. temporaria and R. dalmatina. Zeitschrift für Feldherpetologie: Supplement 13: 77–80.
  • Fog K, Adrados LC, Andersen A, Briggs L, Christensen PK, Damm N, Hansen F, Hesselsøe M, Mikkelsen U (2019) Decline and conservation of amphibians in Denmark. In: Heatwole H, Wilkonson JW (Eds) Amphibian Biology, volume 11, part 5: Northern Europe. Pelagic Publishing, 149–179. www.pelagicpublishing.com
  • Fog K, Schmedes A, de Lasson DR (2001) Nordens padder og krybdyr. Gads Forlag, Copenhagen, 365 pp.
  • Glandt D (2014) Rana arvalis Nilsson, 1842 — Moorfrosch. In: Grossenbacher K (Ed.) Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas. Band 5/III A. Froschlurche (Anura) III A : (Ranidae I), 11–113.
  • Gollmann B, Borkin L, Grossenbacher K, Weddeling K (2014) Rana temporaria Linnaeus, 1758 — Grasfrosch. In: Grossenbacher K (Ed.) Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas. Band 5/III A. Froschlurche (Anura) III A : (Ranidae I), 305–438.
  • Grillitsch B, Grillitsch H, Häupl M, Tiedemann F (1983) Lurche und Kriechtiere Niederösterreichs. Facultas-Verlag, Wien, 176 pp.
  • Grözinger F, Wertz A, Thein J, Feldhaar H, Rödel M-O (2012) Environmental factors fail to explain oviposition site use in the European common frog. Journal of Zoology 288: 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00929.x
  • Hachtel M, Grossenbacher K (2014) Rana dalmatina — Springfrosch. In: Grossenbacher K (Ed.) Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas. Band 5/III A. Froschlurche (Anura) III A : (Ranidae I), 115–186.
  • Hachtel M, Ortmann D, Kupfer A, Sander U, Schmidt P, Weddeling K (2005) Return rates and long-term capture history of amphibians in an agricultural landscape near Bonn (Germany). Russian Journal of Zoology, vol 12, supplement: Proceedings of the 12th Ordinary General Meeting of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica, 146–149.
  • Hartel T (2008) Weather conditions, breeding data and population fluctuation in Rana dalmatina from central Romania. Herpetological Journal 18: 40–44.
  • Kneitz S (1997) Langzeituntersuchungen zur Populationsdynamik und zum Wanderverhalten des Springfrosches im Drachenfelser Ländchen bei Bonn. Rana Sonderheft 2: 231–241.
  • Laan R, Verboom B (1990) Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities. Biological Conservation 54: 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(90)90055-T
  • Meek R (2018) Temporal trends in agile frog Rana dalmatina numbers: results from a long-term study in western France. Herpetological Journal 28: 117–122.
  • Meyer H, Schmidt BR, Grossenbacher K (1998) Analysis of three amphibian populations with quarter-century long time-series. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 265(1395): 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0326
  • Moor H, Bergamini A, Vorburger C, Schmidt BR (2022) Bending the curve: Simple but massive conservation action leads to landscape-scale recovery of amphibians. PNAS 119(42): e2123070119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2123070119
  • Nöllert A, Nöllert C (1992) Die Amphibien Europas. Bestimmung – Gefährdung – Schutz. Franckh-Kosmos, Stuttgart, 382 pp.
  • Pankratius U, Assmann O (2008) Zur Unterscheidung junger Larven der drei mitteleuropäischen Braunfroscharten (Rana arvalis, R. temporaria, R. dalmatina) anhand äusserer Kiemen. Zeitschrift für Feldherpetologie, Supplement 13: 121–125.
  • Schmidt BR, Băncilă RI, Hartel T, Grossenbacher K, Schaub M (2021) Shifts in amphibian population dynamics in response to a change in the predator community. Ecosphere 12(5): e03528. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3528
  • Schmidt BR, Cruickshank SS, Büler C, Bergamini A (2023) Observers are a key source of detection heterogeneity and biased occupancy estimates in species monitoring. Biological Conservation 283: 110102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110102
  • Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn). McGraw-Hill. P., 128–137.
  • Sinsch U (2014) Movement ecology of amphibians: from individual migratory behaviour to spatially structured populations in heterogenous landscapes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 92: 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2013-0028
  • Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28: 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04042.x
  • Stumpel AHP, van der Voet H (1998) Characterizing the suitability of new ponds for amphibians. Amphibia-Reptilia 19: 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853898X00421