Вступ до відкритої науки. Посібник.
Contributors
Editors:
Description
In a world where knowledge is a powerful force for positive change, Open Science is a catalyst for progress. It is a collective effort to ensure that knowledge is not confined to the few but shared with the many, transcending boundaries, and driving innovation for the betterment of society and our planet. Embracing Open Science is a step toward a more equitable, transparent, and prosperous future for all.
Open Science holds particular importance for Ukraine, especially in the context of the ongoing war and post-war circumstances. Here are some specific reasons why Open Science can be crucial for Ukraine at this time:
1. International Collaboration and Support: Ukraine's scientific community can benefit from international collaboration facilitated by Open Science. By sharing research findings, data, and resources openly, Ukrainian researchers can access a global network of experts, funding opportunities, and collaborative projects that can help rebuild and strengthen their scientific infrastructure.
2. Access to Knowledge: In a post-war context, access to knowledge becomes critical for addressing a wide range of challenges, from healthcare to infrastructure rebuilding. Open Science ensures that essential information and research are freely available, making it easier for Ukrainian scientists and policymakers to access valuable insights and data.
3. Innovation and Recovery: Open Science can contribute to the country's recovery and development. It enables Ukrainian researchers to tap into global knowledge to develop innovative solutions for post-war reconstruction, economic growth, and sustainable development.
4. Human Capital Development: Encouraging Open Science can help retain and attract talent in Ukraine. Open access to educational resources and research opportunities can make it more appealing for young scientists and students to stay or return to Ukraine, contributing to the country's scientific and economic growth.
5. Data for Decision-Making: In a post-war scenario, data-driven decision-making is vital. Open Science provides access to essential data that can inform policies and strategies for rebuilding infrastructure, healthcare, and other critical sectors.
6. Transparency and Accountability: Open Science promotes transparency and accountability, which are essential for effective governance and combating corruption. It can help ensure that resources allocated for post-war recovery are used efficiently and for the benefit of the population.
7. Resilience and Preparedness: Open Science can help Ukraine better prepare for and respond to future crises, whether they be natural disasters or geopolitical challenges. By openly sharing knowledge and research, Ukraine can build resilience and adaptability into its scientific and educational systems.
This introductory guide to Open Science is a joint effort of librarians from the Charles University in Prague (Czech Republic) and the University of Warsaw (Poland). It is our small intellectual contribution to, we hope, rebuilding Ukraine as soon as possible and strengthening its research potential.
Authors of chapters:
Valentýna Drtinová (Валентина Дртінова), Charles University - Chapters 2, 7, 8
Dagmar Hanzlíková (Даґмар Ганзлікова), Charles University - Chapter 4
Milan Janíček (Мілан Янічек), Charles University - Chapters 1, 3
Anna Książczak-Gronowska (Анна Ксьонжчак-Ґроновська), University of Warsaw - Chapter 12
Karolina Minch (Кароліна Мінх), University of Warsaw - Chapters 9, 10
Lilianna Nalewajska (Ліліанна Налевайська), University of Warsaw - Chapters 5, 11
Zuza Wiorogórska (Зуза Вьороґурська), University of Warsaw - Chapter 6
Anna Wołodko (Анна Володко), University of Warsaw - Chapter 13
Translation from English:
Kateryna Tkachuk
Typesetting and layout:
Justyna Grzymala-Luszcz
This work was financed by Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (NAWA).
NAWA 'Solidarity with Ukraine' programme:
https://nawa.gov.pl/instytucje/uniwersytety-europejskie
„Solidarity with Ukraine – 4EU+ for Ukraine” is a programme of the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (NAWA) with a budget of approx. 765 200,00 PLN (approx. 162 000 euros). University of Warsaw is its coordinating institution.
Project lifecycle: 9 January 2023 – 31 December 2023
http://en.bwz.uw.edu.pl/solidarity-with-ukraine-4eu-for-ukraine-about-the-project/
Version 2. The latest version of the e-book has a revised title that better conveys the meaning of the publication in Ukrainian. Linguistic corrections have also been made.
Files
Open_Science_An_Introductory_Guide_ver_2.pdf
Files
(6.2 MB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:877b187f4470d8f55612018ead7a136c
|
6.2 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Additional titles
- Alternative title (English)
- Open Science – An Introductory Guide
Funding
- Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej
Dates
- Available
-
2024-02-16
References
- Digital Curation Centre. Data Management Plans [online]. Available online: https://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/data-management-plans
- Digital Curation Centre. 2013. Checklist for a Data Management Plan v.4.0. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Available online: https://www.dcc.ac.uk/DMPs/checklist
- ELIXIR. 2021. Data Management Plan. Research Data Management Kit. A deliverable from the EU-funded ELIXIR-CONVERGE project (grant agreement 871075). Available online: https://rdmkit.elixir-europe.org/data_management_plan
- European Commission. Data management. H2020 Online Manual [online]. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/cross-cutting-issues/ open-access-data-management/data-management_en.htm
- Jones, Sarah. 2011. How to Develop a Data Management and Sharing Plan. DCC How-to Guides. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Available online: https://www.dcc.ac.uk/guidance/how-guides/develop-data-plan
- Mons, Barend. 2018. Data Stewardship for Open Science: Implementing FAIR Principles. Chapman and Hall/CRC. ISBN: 9781315351148.
- Ferguson, C. L. (2020). Open Peer Review. Serials Review, 46(4), 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2020.1850039.
- Majumdar, S. (2023). The Scope of Open Peer Review in the Scholarly Publishing Ecosystem. Annals of Library & Information Studies, 70(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v70i1.68736
- Ross-Hellauer T. What Is Open Peer Review? A Systematic Review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6:588 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2 ) https://f1000research.com/articles/6-588/v2
- Wolfram, D., Wang, P., Hembree, A., & Park, H. (2020). Open Peer Review: Promoting Transparency in Open Science. Scientometrics: An International Journal for All Quantitative Aspects of the Science of Science, Communication in Science and Science Policy, 125(2), 1033–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03488-4
- Open Peer Review – https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/learning/open-peer-review/#/id/5a17e150c2af651d1e3b1bc e
- Cook, F., Govender, R., Brennan, P.A. (2023). Greetings From Your Predatory Journal! What They Are, Why They Are a Problem, How to Spot and Avoid Them. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36959056/
- Danevska, L. et al. (2016). How to Recognize and Avoid Potential, Possible, or Probable Predatory Open-Access Publishers, Standalone, and Hijacked Journals. PRILOZI, 37(2–3), 5–13, https://doi.org/10.1515/prilozi-2016-0011
- Devnani, M., Gupta, A. (2015). Predatory Journals Are Only Part of the Problem. BMJ, 350, 707, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h707
- Grudniewicz, A., Moher, D., Cobey, K. D. et al. (2019). Predatory Journals: No Definition, No Defence. Nature, 576, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y
- Schwesinger, G., Wiorogórska, Z. (2023, April 28). Predatory Publishers and Identity Fraud. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7874740
- Siler, K., Vincent-Lamarre, P., Sugimoto, C. R., Larivière, V. (2021). Predatory Publishers' Latest Scam: Bootlegged and Rebranded Papers. Nature 598, 563–565, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02906-8
- Bolelli, S., Perrin, Sébastien. (2021, December 13). Strategies for Publishing in Open Access Journals. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5779084
- Open Access Publishing. (2023, October 2). Foster facilitate open science training for European research. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/node/2331
- Sharing preprints. (2023, October 2). Foster Facilitate Open Science Training for European Research. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/node/2332
- Ševkušić, Milica, Nježić, Irena. (2023) Open access publishing: training approaches: the EIFL open science train-the-trainer bootcamp. OpenPlato. https://openplato.eu/course/view.php?id=45#section-4
- NISSEN, Martin, & PAUPLIN, Pascale. (2022, February 7). Publication Strategies for Monographs in HSS. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5998072
- Nordhoff, S. (2018). Cookbook for Open Access Books. Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1286925
- Open Access Books Toolkit. (2020, October 29). The OAPEN Open Access Books Toolkit. https://oabooks-toolkit.org/
- Open Access Network. (Last updated: 2022, October 21) Business Models for Books. https://open-access.network/en/information/financing/business-models-for-books
- Open Access Network. (Last updated: 2023. February 3) Open Access Books. https://open-access.network/en/information/publishing/open-access-books
- Open Access Publishing. (2023, October 2). FOSTER Facilitate Open Science Training for European Research. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/node/2331
- Ferwerda, Eelco. Open Access Monographic Publishing in the Humanities. Information Services & Use, vol. 30, no. 3-4, pp. 135-141, 2010. DOI: 10.3233/ISU-2010-0611
- Frances Pinter. Why Book Processing Charges (BPCs) Vary So Much. Journal of Electronic Publishing, Volume 21, Issue 1, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0021.101
- Boudry C, Durand-Barthez M (2020) Use of Author Identifier Services (ORCID, ResearcherID) and Academic Social Networks (Academia.edu, ResearchGate) by the Researchers of the University of Caen Normandy (France): A Case Study. PLOS ONE 15(9): e0238583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238583
- Reimer, T. (2015). Your Name Is Not Good Enough: Introducing the ORCID Researcher Identifier at Imperial College London. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 28(3), 76-82.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.268
- Кравченко, С. А. (2023). Унікальні ідентифікаУнікальні ідентифікатори авторів-науковців–Scopus Author ID, Web of Science Researcher ID, ORCID ID: створення та управління. https://tinyurl.com/3zfvp95z
- Новицька, Т. Л. (2019). Системи ORCID і Researcher ID для розвитку інформаційно-дослідницької компетентності наукових і науково-педагогічних працівників. Інформаційно-цифровий освітній простір України: трансформаційні процеси і перспективи розвитку: збірник, 238. https://tinyurl.com/4u8c4zhk
- Hess DJ. Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York University Press; 1997.
- Andrzejewski S., Julliard, R. (2022, June 7). Citizen Science: Producing Data With People for Innovating Research. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6642538
- Ignat, T., Ayris, P., Labastida i Juan, I., Reilly, S., Dorch, B. F., Kaarsted, T., & Overgaard, A.K. (2018). Merry Work: Libraries and Citizen Science. Insights, 31. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.431
- EU-citizen.science [online] https://eu-citizen.science/
- European Commission: Open Science, [online] https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2019-12/ec_rtd_factsheet-open-scie nce_2019.pdf
- Kaarsted, T., Blake, O., Nielsen, K.H., Alving, B., Rasmussen, L.T., Overgaard, A.K., Hansen, S.M.-B. (2023). How European Research Libraries Can Support Citizen-Enhanced Open Science. Open Information Science, vol. 7, no. 1, 2023, pp. 20220146. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2022-0146
- Robinson L.D., Cawthray, J.L., West, S.E., Bonn, A., & Ansine, J. (2018). Ten Principles of Citizen Science. In S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, & A. Bonn. Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London, UCL Press. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787352339