Eresia della forma-saggio nell'era digitale
Description
The essay breaks into his object, but not to trace the origin from which it would spring, rather to descend into the drifts it generates. On the one hand it meditates on what already is, on the other he never knows where this meditation will take it. It strives to question what is already given and might otherwise simply be contemplated. By appearing to be hostile to it, it unveils the weak consistency of what the cultural product believes itself to be, it highlights its materiality of the productive moment, which instead tends to be presented by the culture as having occurred by inspiration of a holy spirit. «To the essay’s gaze, second nature gains self-awareness as first nature.” But the essay does that for the sake of thought. He tells us that the power of gnoseological experience lies in moving beyond the purely classificatory mechanisms of meaning and placing any meditation on it in the sphere of polysemy.
Files
Aura-1-2020-De-Rosa.pdf
Files
(150.1 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:1c3cc9a5b1f84be659c1ebbc7167df4f
|
150.1 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- ISSN
- 2723-9527