Published January 30, 2024 | Version CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Journal article Open

Efficient Performance Analysis of Image Enhancement Filtering Methods Using MATLAB

Creators

  • 1. FST, ECE, THE ICFAI University Raipur, Raipur, CG-India.

Description

Abstract: Image enhancement is both an art and a science, playing a pivotal role in enhancing the quality of high-resolution images like those captured by digital cameras. Its primary goal is to unveil hidden details within an image and augment the contrast in images with low contrast. This method offers a plethora of options for elevating the visual appeal of images, making it an indispensable tool in numerous applications that face challenges such as noise reduction, degradation, and blurring. In this paper, we implemented frequency domain low pass filters like ideal low pass filter, Butterworth low pass filter and Gaussian low pass filters with execution time using MATLAB. The Butterworth low pass filter given better results than other two with less execution time.

Files

B977713020124.pdf

Files (691.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:37020300a28d2c088304915bfa01fd91
691.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

EISSN
2278-3075
DOI
10.35940/ijitee.B9777.13020124

Dates

Accepted
2024-01-15
Manuscript received on 09 December 2023 | Revised Manuscript received on 18 December 2023 | Manuscript Accepted on 15 January 2024 | Manuscript published on 30 January 2024

References

  • L. Tabar and P. Dean, Teaching atlas of mammography. New York: Thime,3rd ed., 2001. https://doi.org/10.1097/00130747-200108000-00008
  • Valarmathi, Ms P., and V. Radhakrishnan. "Tumor prediction in mammogram using neural network." Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology (2013).
  • R. Schmidt, D.Wolverton, and C. Vyborny, "Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in mammography," in Syllabus: A Categorical Course in Breast Imaging, pp. 199-208, 1995.
  • M.L.Giger, "Current issues in mammography," Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 53-59, Chicago, IL, June 1996.
  • C. Vyborny and M. Giger, "Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography," American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 699-708, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.162.3.8109525
  • R. Reid, "Professional quality assurance for mammography screening programs," Radiology, vol. 177, pp. 8-10, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217807
  • C. Metz and J. Shen, "Gains in accuracy from replicated readings of diagnostic images: Predication and assessment in terms of ROC analysis," Medical Decision Making, vol. 12, pp. 60-75, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9201200110
  • R. Schmidt, R. Nishikawa, and K. Schreibman, "Computer detection of lesions missed by mammography," Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 289-294, July 10-12 2018.
  • R. Schmidt, R. Nishikawa, R. Osnis, K. Schreibman, M. Giger, and K. Doi, "Computerized detection of lesions missed by mammography," Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 105-110, June 9-12 2019.
  • "R2 technology pre-market approval (PMA) of the M1000 image checker," US. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) application #P970058, approved, June 26, 1998.
  • R. Highnam and M. Brady, Mammographic Image Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2017.
  • L. Bassett, V. Jackson, R. Jahan, Y. Fu, and R. Gold, Diagnosis of diseases of the breast. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1997.
  • C. Metz, "ROC methodology in radiologic imaging," Investigative Radiology, vol. 21, pp. 720-733, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-198609000-00009
  • C. Metz, "Evaluation of digital mammography by ROC analysis," Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 61-68, June 9-12 1996.
  • C. Metz, "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis in medical imaging," ICRU News, pp. 7-16, 2017.
  • D. Chakraborty, "Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data," Medical Physics, vol. 16, p. 561, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596358
  • D. Chakraborty and L. Winter, "Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment," Radiology, vol. 174, p. 873, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.174.3.2305073
  • R. Swensson, "Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images," Medical Physics, vol. 23, p. 1709, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597758
  • R. Wagner, S. Beiden, and C. Metz, "Continuous vs. categorical data for ROC analysis: Some quantitative considerations," Academic Radiology, vol. 8, pp. 328-334, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80502-0
  • N. Karssemeijer and W. Veldkamp, "Normalisation of local contrast in mammograms," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 731-738, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.875197
  • K. McLoughlin, P. Bones, and P. Dachman, "Connective tissue representation for detection of microcalcification in digital mammograms," Proceedings of SPIE Medical Image 2002: Image Proceesing, vol. 4684, pp. 1246-1256, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.467084
  • Kinani, L., & Alqasemi, U. (2020). Computer Aided Diagnosis of Mammography Cancer. In International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (Vol. 9, Issue 5, pp. 725–731). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.e9805.069520
  • Jani, K. K., Srivastava, S., & Srivastava, R. (2019). Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Capsule Endoscopy: From Inception to Future. In International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) (Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 12261–12273). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.d8094.118419
  • Voona, V. N., Sathwik, E., Jayanth, T. S., & Rohan, T. (2022). Brain Segmentation using MATLAB. In International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (Vol. 11, Issue 8, pp. 43–49). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.h9164.0711822
  • Nasir, F. M., & Watabe, H. (2020). Validation of the Image Registration Technique from Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Signal and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Image. In International Journal of Management and Humanities (Vol. 4, Issue 9, pp. 63–69). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijmh.i0877.054920
  • Rehman, F., Ali, S. S., Panhwar, H., Phul, Dr. A. H., Rajpar, S. A., Ahmed, S., Rabbani, S., & Mehmood, T. (2021). Brain Tumor Detection from MR Images using Image Process Techniques and Tools in Matlab Software. In International Journal of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technology (Vol. 1, Issue 4, pp. 1–4). https://doi.org/10.54105/ijamst.c3016.081421