Published April 8, 2005 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Urophonius iheringi Pocock 1893

  • 1. CONICET - Cátedra de Diversidad Animal I, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Vélez Sarsfield 299, X 5000 JJC Córdoba, Argentina; lacosta @ com. uncor. edu Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25755 - 2510 U. S. A.; fet @ marshall. edu

Description

Urophonius iheringi Pocock 1893 (Bothriuridae)

Urophonius jheringii Pocock 1893: 101; Acosta 1988: 28. Original spelling, deemed to be incorrect because of prevailing usage of the spelling iheringi.

Urophonius iheringi: Mello­Leitão 1931: 99. Subsequent spelling, deemed to be correct because of more widespread use.

Pocock (1893) named Urophonius Jheringii honoring the German zoologist H. von Ihering, which he spelled 'Jhering'. Without resource of an external evidence, it should be assumed that Pocock believed that this was the correct spelling of the person. The species remained in the synonymy of Urophonius brachycentrus (Thorell 1877a) for more than 30 years (Lowe & Fet 2000), and in that period, when mentioned, the original spelling was used in some occasions (Pocock 1898, Kraepelin 1899), while in others the initial letter was corrected to Iheringii (Kraepelin 1894). Mello­Leitão (1931) revalidated the name, spelling it as iheringi (note the single i genitive instead of double ii). There is no statement that renders Kraepelin's (1894) or Mello­Leitão's (1931) actions as emendations, so they fit within the category of incorrect subsequent spellings. The usage of the name shows that authors widely adopted the corrected version of the name, iheringi. From 1931 to 1996 most authors followed Mello­Leitão. Lowe & Fet (2000) list 16 citations for iheringi, made by seven authors in that period, while only Acosta (1988) reinstated the original spelling. Since the spelling iheringi is in prevailing usage, it is to be maintained as the 'correct spelling' (Arts. 33.3.1 and 33.4). Lowe & Fet (2000) adopted iheringii as valid, but the prevaling usage also affects the modification of the genitive (correct ending with a single i).

Notes

Published as part of Acosta, Luis E. & Fet, Victor, 2005, Nomenclatural notes in Scorpiones (Arachnida), pp. 1-12 in Zootaxa 934 (1) on page 3, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.934.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5044338

Files

Files (2.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:35e8fe731627b5fe1d84eabb3b45921a
2.2 kB Download

System files (14.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:85be32ae5c84ebe29e0d1e75721ffaa0
14.4 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Bothriuridae
Genus
Urophonius
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Scorpiones
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Pocock
Species
iheringi
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Urophonius iheringi Pocock, 1893 sec. Acosta & Fet, 2005

References

  • Pocock, R. I. (1893) A contribution to the study of Neotropical scorpions. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Ser. 6 th, 12 (68), 77 - 103.
  • Acosta, L. E. (1988) Contribucion al conocimiento taxonomico del genero Urophonius Pocock, 1893 (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae). The Journal of Arachnology, 16 (1), 23 - 33.
  • Mello-Leitao, C. de (1931) Nota sobre os Bothriuridas sul-americanos. Archivos do Museu Nacional, 33, 75 - 113.
  • Thorell, T. (1877 a) [1876]. Etudes scorpiologiques. Atti della Societa Italiana di Scienze Naturali, 19, 75 - 272.
  • Lowe, G. & Fet, V. (2000) Family Bothriuridae Simon, 1880. In: Fet, V., Sissom, W. D., Lowe, G. & Braunwalder, M. E., Catalog of the scorpions of the world (1758 - 1998). The New York Entomological Society, pp. 17 - 53.
  • Pocock, R. I. (1898) Descriptions of some new scorpions from Central and South America. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Ser. 7 th, 1 (5), 384 - 394.
  • Kraepelin, K. (1899) Scorpiones und Pedipalpi. In: Dahl E., Das Tierreich, R. Friedlander und Sohn, Berlin, 8, pp. i - xviii, 1 - 265.
  • Kraepelin, K. (1894) Revision der Scorpione. II. Scorpionidae und Bothriuridae. Jahrbuch der Hamburgischen Wissenschaftlichen Anstalten, 11 (1), 1 - 248.