Published November 23, 2023
| Version 2
Journal article
Open
A triple helix model for the diffusion of Industry 4.0 technologies in firms in the Marche Region
Creators
- 1. Department of Law, University of Macerata, Macerata, Marche, 62100, Italy
Description
Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies can help firms innovate their products and processes, but firms in the Marche Region, Italy, struggle adopting them. To understand what policy measures are necessary to help these firms innovate, an analysis of the Marche Region's context, key institutions, and policies is conducted and coupled with an explorative survey to firms in the Marche Region that already use I4.0 technologies. The results show that these firms collaborate with many public and private actors at the regional, national, and international levels. The paper suggests that innovation intermediaries, that are present in the region and already help firms innovate, could manage the knowledge flows among them and between government, academia, and industry so that firms can receive proper support in adopting I4.0.
Files
openreseurope-3-18228.pdf
Files
(1.1 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:c07e5a6a7ae35fc38ac0bfc9c27de126
|
1.1 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Colombo AW, Karnouskos S, Bangemann T (2014). Towards the Next Generation of Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05624-1_1
- (2023). Industry 4.0.
- Subic A, Xiang Y, Pai S (2018). Blockchain and Industry 4.0. Why Blockchain is at the heart of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Digital Economy?.
- Swan M (2015). Blockchain: blueprint for a new economy.
- Moeuf A, Lamouri S, Pellerin R (2020). Identification of critical success factors, risks and opportunities of Industry 4.0 in SMEs. Int J Prod Res. doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1636323
- Bravi L, Murmura F (2021). Industry 4.0 enabling technologies as a tool for the development of a competitive strategy in Italian manufacturing companies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101629
- Masood T, Sonntag P (2020). Industry 4.0: Adoption challenges and benefits for SMEs. Comput Ind. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103261
- Ghobakhloo M, Iranmanesh M, Vilkas M (2022). Drivers and barriers of Industry 4.0 technology adoption among manufacturing SMEs: a systematic review and transformation roadmap. JMTM. doi:10.1108/JMTM-12-2021-0505
- Pech M, Vrchota J (2020). Classification of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises Based on the Level of Industry 4.0 Implementation. Appl Sci. doi:10.3390/app10155150
- Cucculelli M, Lena D (2017). Tecnologie digitali e sistema produttivo. Prime evidenze per le Marche. Economia Marche Journal of Applied Economics.
- (2023). Bandi ricerca e innovazione.
- (2021). Allegato A) DGR 972 2-8-21, Agenda per la trasformazione digitale 2021-2027.
- (2023). La Strategia di Specializzazione Intelligente 2021-2027.
- (2018). Dottorati innovativi a caratterizzazione industriale.
- Leydesdorff L, Etzkowitz H (1998). The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy. doi:10.1093/spp/25.3.195
- Cucculelli M, Dileo I, Pini M (2022). Filling the void of family leadership: institutional support to business model changes in the Italian Industry 4.0 experience. J Technol Transf. doi:10.1007/s10961-021-09847-4
- Reischauer G (2018). Industry 4.0 as policy-driven discourse to institutionalize innovation systems in manufacturing. Technol Forecast Soc Change. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.012
- Ingaldi M, Ulewicz R (2019). Problems with the Implementation of Industry 4.0 in Enterprises from the SME Sector. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su12010217
- Cimini C, Boffelli A, Lagorio A (2020). How do industry 4.0 technologies influence organisational change? An empirical analysis of Italian SMEs. JMTM. doi:10.1108/JMTM-04-2019-0135
- Nakamoto S (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
- Attaran M, Gunasekaran A (2019). Blockchain-enabled technology: the emerging technology set to reshape and decentralise many industries. IJADS. doi:10.1504/IJADS.2019.102642
- Bianchini M, Kwon I (2020). Blockchain for SMEs and entrepreneurs in Italy. doi:10.1787/f241e9cc-en
- Casino F, Dasaklis TK, Patsakis C (2019). A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues. Telemat Inform. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006
- Kopyto M, Lechler S, von der Gracht HA (2020). Potentials of blockchain technology in supply chain management: Long-term judgments of an international expert panel. Technol Forecast Soc Change. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120330
- Violino S, Pallottino F, Sperandio G (2020). A Full Technological Traceability System for Extra Virgin Olive Oil. Foods. doi:10.3390/foods9050624
- Bellucci M, Cesa Bianchi D, Manetti G (2022). Blockchain in accounting practice and research: systematic literature review. MEDAR. doi:10.1108/MEDAR-10-2021-1477
- Song Z, Zhu J (2022). Blockchain for smart manufacturing systems: a survey. Chinese Management Studies. doi:10.1108/CMS-04-2021-0152
- Antoniadis I, Stamatis K, Spinthiropoulos K (2019). Blockchain Applications in Marketing.
- Chan KY, Abdullah J, Shahid A (2019). A Framework for Traceable and Transparent Supply Chain Management for Agri-food Sector in Malaysia using Blockchain Technology. IJACSA. doi:10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0101120
- Longo F, Nicoletti L, Padovano A (2019). Blockchain-enabled supply chain: An experimental study. Comput Ind Eng. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.026
- Fernández-Caramés TM, Blanco-Novoa O, Froiz-Míguez I (2019). Towards an Autonomous Industry 4.0 Warehouse: A UAV and Blockchain-Based System for Inventory and Traceability Applications in Big Data-Driven Supply Chain Management. Sensors (Basel). doi:10.3390/s19102394
- Khan PW, Byun YC, Park N (2020). IoT-Blockchain Enabled Optimized Provenance System for Food Industry 4.0 Using Advanced Deep Learning. Sensors (Basel). doi:10.3390/s20102990
- Garrard R, Fielke S (2020). Blockchain for trustworthy provenances: A case study in the Australian aquaculture industry. Technology in Society. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101298
- de Boissieu E, Kondrateva G, Baudier P (2011). The use of blockchain in the luxury industry: supply chains and the traceability of goods. JEIM. doi:10.1108/JEIM-11-2020-0471
- Sternberg HS, Hofmann E, Roeck D (2021). The Struggle is Real: Insights from a Supply Chain Blockchain Case. J Bus Logist. doi:10.1111/jbl.12240
- Alkhudary R, Brusset X, Fenies P (2020). Blockchain in general management and economics: a systematic literature review. EBR. doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2019-0297
- Baharmand H, Maghsoudi A, Coppi G (2021). Exploring the application of blockchain to humanitarian supply chains: insights from Humanitarian Supply Blockchain pilot project. IJOPM. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-12-2020-0884
- Caldarelli G, Zardini A, Rossignoli C (2021). Blockchain adoption in the fashion sustainable supply chain: Pragmatically addressing barriers. J Organ Chang Manag. doi:10.1108/JOCM-09-2020-0299
- Compagnucci L, Lepore D, Spigarelli F (2022). Uncovering the potential of blockchain in the agri-food supply chain: An interdisciplinary case study. J Eng Technol Manag. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101700
- Khan IS, Kauppila O, Iancu B (2022). Triple helix collaborative innovation and value co-creation in an Industry 4.0 context. IJIL. doi:10.1504/IJIL.2022.125029
- Gunasekara C (2006). Reframing the Role of Universities in the Development of Regional Innovation Systems. J Technol Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-005-5016-4
- Andrews D, Nicoletti G, Timiliotis C (2018). Digital technology diffusion: A matter of capabilities, incentives or both?. doi:10.1787/7c542c16-en
- Abbas A, Avdic A, Xiaobao P (2019). University-government collaboration for the generation and commercialization of new knowledge for use in industry. J Innov Knowl. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.002
- Luthra S, Kumar A, Zavadskas EK (2020). Industry 4.0 as an enabler of sustainability diffusion in supply chain: an analysis of influential strength of drivers in an emerging economy. Int J Prod Res. doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1660828
- Pourmehdi M, Paydar MM, Ghadimi P (2022). Analysis and evaluation of challenges in the integration of Industry 4.0 and sustainable steel reverse logistics network. Comput Ind Eng. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107808
- Letaba P (2019). Relationship between Dominant Triple Helix Model and Type of Intermediary Organizations. 2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET). doi:10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893910
- Prodi E, Tassinari M, Ferrannini A (2022). Industry 4.0 policy from a sociotechnical perspective: The case of German competence centres. Technol Forecast Soc Change. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121341
- Katzy B, Turgut E, Holzmann T (2013). Innovation intermediaries: a process view on open innovation coordination. Technol Anal Strateg Manag. doi:10.1080/09537325.2013.764982
- Stewart J, Hyysalo S (2008). Intermediaries, users and social learning in technological innovation. Int J Innov Mgt. doi:10.1142/S1363919608002035
- Barrie J, Zawdie G, João E (2019). Assessing the role of triple helix system intermediaries in nurturing an industrial biotechnology innovation network. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.287
- Russo M, Caloffi A, Rossi F (2019). Innovation intermediaries and performance-based incentives: A case study of regional innovation poles. SCI PUBL POLICY. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy028
- (2021). EU Grants: How to complete your ethics self-assessment: V2.0.
- (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR).
- Testi N (2023).
- Testi N (2023).
- Testi N (2023). Zenodo.
- Testi N (2023). Zenodo.
- Yin RK (2018). Case study research and applications: design and methods.
- Thurmond VA (2001). The point of triangulation. J Nurs Scholarsh. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x
- (2019). Primo Rapporto valutativo sulla S3.
- (2023).
- (2023). Marche Innovazione.
- (null). Punto Impresa Digitale.
- (2021). La digitalizzazione nelle imprese delle Marche: l'attività del PID e gli indirizzi di policy.
- (2021). Le imprese nella Regione Marche.
- (2023). Centri di Competenza ad Alta Specializzazione.
- (null). Fondazione Cluster Marche.
- Steenkamp RJ (2020). A world economic forum perspective on the quadruple helix model of innovation. S AFR J IND ENG. doi:10.7166/31-4-2295
- Capetillo A, Abraham Tijerina A, Ramirez R (2021). Evolution from triple helix into penta helix: the case of Nuevo Leon 4.0 and the push for industry 4.0. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s12008-021-00785-x
- Majumdar A, Garg H, Jain R (2021). Managing the barriers of Industry 4.0 adoption and implementation in textile and clothing industry: Interpretive structural model and triple helix framework. Comput Ind. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103372
- AlMalki HA, Durugbo CM (2023). Institutional innovation readiness for Industry 4.0 education: towards an inclusive model for the Kingdom of Bahrain. ASIAN J TECHNOL INNO. doi:10.1080/19761597.2022.2056492
- Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ, Grigoroudis E (2022). Helix Trilogy: the Triple, Quadruple, and Quintuple Innovation Helices from a Theory, Policy, and Practice Set of Perspectives. J Knowl Econ. doi:10.1007/s13132-021-00813-x
- Costa ACF, de Mello SANTOS VH, de Oliveira OJ (2022). Towards the Revolution and Democratization of Education: A Framework to Overcome Challenges and Explore Opportunities through Industry 4.0. Informatics in Education. doi:10.15388/infedu.2022.01
- Lepore D, Frontoni E, Micozzi A (2023). Uncovering the potential of innovation ecosystems in the healthcare sector after the COVID-19 crisis. Health Policy. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.12.001
- Liu D, Zhu YP (2022). Evolution of Knowledge Structure in an Emerging Field Based on a Triple Helix Model: the Case of Smart Factory. J Knowl Econ. doi:10.1007/s13132-022-01073-z
- Ojubanire OA, Sebti H, Berbain S (2022). Towards developing a national framework for industry 4.0 in African emerging economies. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. doi:10.1080/20421338.2022.2129347
- Tataj D, Krutko PL, Bellavista J (2022). The Ann Arbor SPARK-Network Intelligence as a driver for the emergence of a next generation science and technology park [Ann Arbor SPARK - Network Intelligence clau en l'emergència de la nova generació de parcs de ciència y tecnologia] [Ann Arbor SPARK - Network Intelligence clave para la emergencia de la nueva generación de parques de ciencia y tecnología]. J Evol Stud Bus. doi:10.1344/jesb2022.2.j108
- Bruschi A (2005). Metodologia della ricerca sociale.
- (2020). Cluster tecnologici nazionali.
- Cutrini E, Micucci G, Montanaro P (2013). Traditional Industrial Districts in the Face of Globalization: The Case of the Marche Footwear District. SSRN Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2243579
- Becattini G (2017). The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. Revue d'économie industrielle. doi:10.4000/rei.6507
- Cappelli R (2020). Le recenti performance tecnologiche delle Marche: un'analisi con dati di brevetto. Economia Marche Journal of Applied Economics.
- (2023). Comunicato stampa "Distretti industriali delle Marche nei primi nove mesi del 2022".
- (2022). 14° Rapporto Economica e finanza dei distretti industriali.
- Micozzi A, Micozzi F, Dubbini S (2020). Il modello marchigiano e industria 4.0: potenzialità e criticità. L'INDUSTRIA.
- (2019). MiSE: Blockchain for Made in Italy traceability: origin, quality, sustainability.
- Bracci E, Tallaki M, Ievoli R (2022). Knowledge, diffusion and interest in blockchain technology in SMEs. J Knowl Manag. doi:10.1108/JKM-02-2021-0099
- Crupi A, Del Sarto N, Di Minin A (2020). The digital transformation of SMEs - a new knowledge broker called the digital innovation hub. JKM. doi:10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0623
- (2022). i-Labs Industry.
- (2023). Smart Specialisation Platform.
- Foray D, David PA, Hall BH (2011). Smart specialisation From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation.
- (2020). LEGGE REGIONALE 30 luglio 2020 n. 36.
- (2022). Struttura ATECO 2007 aggiornamento 2022 (xlsx).