Published September 22, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Characterization of the selection of medicines for the Brazilian primary health care

  • 1. Universidade de Brasília. Curso de Farmácia. Faculdade de Ceilândia
  • 2. Universidade de Brasília. Faculdade de Ceilândia. Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde
  • 3. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
  • 4. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas
  • 5. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de Farmácia. Departamento de Farmácia Social
  • 6. Santa Casa de São Paulo. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas. Departamento de Saúde Coletiva
  • 7. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas. Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas
  • 8. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Núcleo de Estudos de Políticas Públicas Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas. Departamento de Saúde Coletiva. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Faculdade de Medicina. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia
  • 9. Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva

Description

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the process of selection of medicines for primary health care in the Brazilian regions.

METHODS: This article is part of the Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos – Serviços, 2015 (PNAUM – National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines – Services, 2015), a cross-sectional study that consisted of an information gathering in a sample of cities in the five regions of Brazil. The data used were collected by interviews with those responsible for pharmaceutical services (PS) (n = 506), professionals responsible for the dispensing of medicines (n = 1,139), and physicians (n = 1,558). To evaluate the difference between ratios, we adopted the Chi-square test for complex samples. The differences between the averages were analyzed in generalized linear models with F-test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The analyses considered significant had p≤0.05. 

RESULTS: The professionals responsible for pharmaceutical services reported non-existence of a formally constituted Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee (PTC) (12.5%). They claimed to have an updated (80.4%) list of Essential Medicines (85.3%) and being active participants of this process (88.2%). However, in the perception of respondents, the list only partially (70.1%) meets the health demands. Of the interviewed professionals responsible for the dispensing of medicines, only 16.6% were pharmacists; even so, 47.8% reported to know the procedures to change the list. From the perspective of most of these professionals (70.9%), the list meets the health demands of the city. Among physicians, only 27.2% reported to know the procedures to change the list, but 76.5% would have some claim to change it. Most of them reported to base their claims in clinical experiences (80.0%). For 13.0% of them, the list meets the health demands. 

CONCLUSIONS: As this is the first national survey of characterization of the process of selection of medicines within primary health care, it brings unpublished data for the assessment of policies related to medicines in Brazil. 

Files

139742-Article eng.pdf

Files (398.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3c219dcbaedc1f6dda64a96d9d79e013
201.1 kB Preview Download
md5:9647d0b3f57d56a1585834f9ea32cacc
197.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Other
2016-03-31
Received

References

  • KARNIKOWSKI, MARGÔ GOMES DE OLIVEIRA ; GALATO, DAYANI ; MEINERS, MICHELINE MARIE MILWARD DE AZEVEDO ; SILVA, EMÍLIA VITÓRIA DA ; GERLACK, LETÍCIA FARIAS ; BÓS, ÂNGELO JOSÉ GONÇALVES ; Leite, Silvana Nair ; LEITE, S. N. ; ÁLVARES, JULIANA ; GUIBU, IONE AQUEMI ; SOEIRO, ORLANDO MARIO ; COSTA, KAREN SARMENTO ; COSTA, EDINÁ ALVES ; GUERRA JUNIOR, AUGUSTO AFONSO ; ACURCIO, FRANCISCO DE ASSIS . Characterization of the selection of medicines for the Brazilian primary health care. REVISTA DE SAÚDE PÚBLICA (ONLINE), v. 51, p. 1-2, 2017.