Published December 12, 2024 | Version v1
Other Open

Technical evaluation and standardization of the human thyroid microtissue assay

  • 1. US Environmental Protection Agency

Description

The success and sustainability of U.S. EPA efforts to reduce, refine, and replace in vivo animal testing depends on the ability to translate toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data from in vitro and in silico new approach methods (NAMs) to human-relevant exposures and health outcomes. Organotypic culture models employing primary human cells enable consideration of human health effects and inter-individual variability, but present significant challenges for test method standardization, transferability, and validation. Increasing confidence in the information provided by these in vitro NAMs requires setting appropriate performance standards and benchmarks, defined by the context of use, to consider human biology and mechanistic relevance without animal data. The human thyroid microtissue assay utilizes primary human thyrocytes to reproduce structural and functional features of the thyroid gland that enable testing for potential thyroid disrupting chemicals. As a variable-donor assay platform, conventional principles for assay performance standardization need to be balanced with the ability to predict a range of human responses. The objectives of this study were to 1) define the technical parameters for optimal donor procurement, primary thyrocyte qualification, and performance in the human thyroid microtissue assay, and 2) set benchmark ranges for reference chemical responses. Thyrocytes derived from a cohort of 32 demographically-diverse euthyroid donors were characterized across a battery of endpoints to evaluate morphological and functional variability. Reference chemical responses were profiled to evaluate the range and chemical-specific variability of donor-dependent effects within the cohort. The data informed minimum acceptance criteria for donor qualification and set benchmark parameters for method transfer proficiency testing and validation of assay performance.

Notes

Funding provided by: Environmental Protection Agency
ROR ID: https://ror.org/03tns0030
Award Number:

Files

CSS.405.1.1.4_Sup_Figure_1_v2.pdf

Files (8.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:88e79babb047698933df7913202cd81d
6.8 MB Preview Download
md5:60344681aace45d3cd6439c1844f9c69
738.3 kB Preview Download
md5:862b200421ead5ef18af685ce37aeb5e
316.6 kB Preview Download
md5:5d4e97eb87f3e8004a2eacca17402768
497.4 kB Preview Download
md5:fe49af86c5dcb9680ed30d93eae7eddd
134.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1093/toxsci/kfae014 (DOI)
Is derived from
10.5061/dryad.j9kd51cjv (DOI)