Published March 16, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Patients in insulin analogues use via judicial litigation: do they use the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS)?

  • 1. Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de São João Del Rei (UFSJ) - Divinópolis (MG), Brasil.
  • 2. 2 Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de São João Del Rei (UFSJ) - Divinópolis (MG), Brasil
  • 3. Departamento de Farmácia, Centro Universitário das Universidades Integradas de Ourinhos (FIO) - Ourinhos (SP), Brasil
  • 4. 1 Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de São João Del Rei (UFSJ) - Divinópolis (MG), Brasil
  • 5. Curso de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São João Del Rei (UFSJ) - Divinópolis (MG), Brasil.
  • 6. Curso de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de São João Del Rei (UFSJ) - Divinópolis (MG), Brasil.
  • 7. Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) - Florianópolis (SC), Brasil.
  • 8. Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de São João Del Rei (UFSJ) - Divinópolis (MG), Brasil

Description

Background: Studies show that among the drugs most commonly used in judicial litigation in Brazil, are those used to treat diabetes mellitus, especially insulin analogues.

Objective: Evaluate the use of the Unified Health System (SUS) by patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), who receive insulin analogues through judicial action, before and after this process. 

Method: In a retrospective longitudinal observational study, secondary data was used from these patients in Minas Gerais, Brazil, in 2018. Socio-demographic information was collected and related to the follow-up of these patients in the SUS. The McNemar χ2 test was used to compare the proportions of the variables.

Results: Of the 89 patients analyzed, women (53.9%) were predominant. Most patients were aged between 20 and 39 years (52.8%), and more than half, 55.1%, use only a private health system. After the judicial action, there was a significant increase (p <0.05) in the number of patients who had consultations in primary health care (from 19.1% to 30.3%) and emergency medical appointments (from 1.1% to 9.0%). 

Conclusion: It is observed that the majority of patients with T1DM via judicial action in the SUS are not monitored by this health system through examinations, consultations, and hospitalizations.

Files

download (1).pdf

Files (664.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:99b4fe59e457e9fe3616900513c73e42
664.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • MENDONÇA, THAYS SANTOS ; SILVA, EDUARDO SÉRGIO ; PEREIRA, MARIANA LINHARES ; OBRELI-NETO, PAULO ROQUE ; BELO, VINÍCIUS SILVA ; FERREIRA, GUSTAVO COSTA ; CHAVES, PAULA RESENDE DAHER ; Leite, Silvana Nair ; LEITE, S. N. ; BALDONI, ANDRÉ OLIVEIRA . Patients in insulin analogues use via judicial litigation: do they use the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS)?. CADERNOS SAÚDE COLETIVA, v. 31, p. :e31020102., 2023.