Published February 28, 2017 | Version v1
Figure Open

Figure 3 from: Penev L, Mietchen D, Chavan V, Hagedorn G, Smith V, Shotton D, Ó Tuama É, Senderov V, Georgiev T, Stoev P, Groom Q, Remsen D, Edmunds S (2017) Strategies and guidelines for scholarly publishing of biodiversity data. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e12431. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12431

  • 1. Pensoft Publishers & Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 2. EvoMRI Communications, Jena, Germany
  • 3. Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 4. Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 5. The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom
  • 6. University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • 7. Independent Researcher, Cork, Ireland
  • 8. Institute of Biodiversity & Ecosystem Reearch, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 9. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 10. National Museum of Natural History and Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 11. Botanic Garden Meise, Meise, Belgium
  • 12. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, United States of America
  • 13. GigaScience, BGI HK Ltd., Tai Po Industrial Estate, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Description

Figure 3 - The user interface of the ARPHA Writing Tool through which single or multiple specimen records from GBIF, BOLD, iDigBio and PlutoF are imported through records identifiers.

Files

oo_120920.PNG

Files (38.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:155e8dbd941f87164a84e6c2524bcbf5
38.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
10.3897/rio.3.e12431 (DOI)