PEDAGOGIES TO IMPROVE TEACHING, LEARNING AND EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Creators
- 1. Research Scholar, Alliance School of Law, Alliance University, Bengaluru & Assistant Professor, Srinivas Institute of Management Studies, Mangaluru, Karnataka
- 2. Vice Chancellor & Research Guide, Alliance University, Bengaluru, Karnataka
Description
The success in Human life depends on the knowledge and skills individual possess. Knowledge helps to enjoy and manage physical and social changes but using knowledge for social cause will gives wisdom. The higher education system in developing country like India should impart knowledge and disseminate skills through empowering the learner. Value based education deliver theoretical, legal, ethical and practical ideologies to the students. Higher education institution should aim to improve slow learners by developing their skills. Innovations in teaching, learning and evaluation are essential to spread quality education in the country. Professor, Pradeep M.D. has developed ‘Consistent Learning Model’ and ‘Life Centric Skill Enrichment Framework’ to build competency among students in higher education. These models collaborates the variables of learning environment, learning methods and interest of the pupil with learning pedagogies. Everyone should consistently grow and develop in life to be self sufficient in the society. These pedagogies are innovations that could be adopted by any higher education institutions to improve the slow learners and enrich the skills among students by building competency to face the challenges in life. These models are based on the life expectancy decided by the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare during 2015. This paper review various techniques used to regulate the system of education, identifies the skill delivery model for higher education and evaluates the Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat associated with the ‘Consistent Learning Model’ and ‘Life Centric Skill Enrichment Model’ in building competency of students at higher education in India.
Files
178.pdf
Files
(500.8 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:c0d80e4e374bffce43e955e15f6400a5
|
500.8 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. Carol Chapnick Mukhopadhyay & Susan Seymour (1994).Women, Education and Family Structure in India, Westview Press, Boulder, 37-57. 2. Kasius Cora (1954). New Directions in Social Work, Harper and Brothex, New York, 32, 3. Basil Hans V. & Sowjanya S. Shetty (2016). Education and Women Empowerment in India- Study in Dakshina Kannada District, Deeksha, Bi-annual Journal of Social Work, 14(1), 5-21. 4. Erikson, E. H. (1993). Childhood and Society, W.W. Norton & Company, Newyork, London.187-268. 5. Weick A. (1994). Reconstructing Social Work Education. J. Laird (Ed.) Revisioning Social Work Education-A social Reconstructionist Approach, New York, The Haworth Press, 11-30. 6. Hokenstad M.C. & Rigby B.D (1977). Participation in Teaching and Learning an Idea Book for Social Work Educators, International Association of Schools of Social Work, New York. 7. Pradeep. M. D. & Kalicharan, M. L. (2016). Life Centric Skill Enrichment Framework - An Effective Pedagogy for Empowerment, International Journal of Computational Research and Development, 1(1), 40-46. 8. Pradeep M. D., P S Aithal (2015). Learning Through Team Centric Exercise & Key Point Pedagogy-An effective Learning Model for Slow Learners in Social Work Education Training, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(9), 265-270. 9. Claude Mathis, (1984). Mastering the Techniques of Teaching by Joseph Lowman, San Francisco, Change: The Magazine of High Learning, 16(6), 51-52. 10. Gibbs L. &Gambrill E (1999). Critical Thinking for Social Workers, Exercises for the Helping Profession, Thousand Oaks, California, Pipe Forge Press. 11. Eraut M. (1989). Selecting and Justifying objectives,Eraut M. (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Educational Methodology. Oxford Pegamon Press, 338-341. 12. Pradeep M.D. (2015). Impact of Information Technology in banking‐ Cyber Law and Cyber Security in India, International Journal of Management, IT & Engineering 5(7), 411-428. 13. Pradeep M.D. & Krishna Prasad K. (2016). Modern Paradigm shift in Social Work Profession through Technology-New Dimension in Social Work Education, International Journal of Current Research and Modern Education (IJCRME), 1(1) 433-443. 14. Fredriksson, O. (2003). Internet-based self-services: Relational Aspects of E-Banking- A private client survey analysis, IMIT working paper series, 136. 15. Merton R.K, (1960). Some Thoughts on the Professions in American Society, Brown University, papers 37, 1-17. 16. Helfen M., & Krüger L. Information Technology, New Organizational Concepts and Employee Participation - Will Unionism Survive, ISBN 0-7803-7824-0/02, p. 202 17. Pradeep M. D & Ravindra B.K., (2016). Effective Disbursement of Social Security Benefits to the labour through Information Technology in India, International Journal of Advanced trends in Engineering and Technology (IJATET), 1(1), 114-121. 18. McKenzie, K., Murray, K. R., Murray, A. L. & Richelieu, M. (2015). The effectiveness of University Counselling for students with academic issues, Couns. Psychother. Res, Doi:10.1002/capr.12034, 15, 284-288. 19. Indrajeet Dutta (2016) Open Educational Resources (OER): Opportunities and Challenges for Indian Higher Education, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 17(2), 110-121. 20. Pradeep M.D., (2017) Women Empowerment for Inclusive Growth, Studium Press Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, ISBN-978-93-80012-93-3, 114, 143. 21. Society for Participatory Research in Asia (1987). A Manual for Participatory Training Methodology in Development, New Delhi, PRIA, (www.pria.org).