Published November 29, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Microplastics in Arctic invertebrates: status on occurrence and recommendations for future monitoring

  • 1. Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 1870 Nordnes, Bergen, N-5817, Norway
  • 2. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Kristineberg Marine Research Station, Fiskebäckskil, S-45178, Sweden
  • 3. Norwegian Institute for Water Research, N-6273, Oslo, Norway
  • 4. Department of Climate and Environment, N-5007, Norwegian Research Centre, Stavanger, Norway
  • 5. University of Iceland's Research Centre in Sudurnes, University of Iceland, Gardvegi 1, 245, Sudurnesjabaer, Iceland
  • 6. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, N-5006, Bergen, Norway
  • 7. Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Sainte Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada

Description

Few studies have been published on the occurrence and distribution of microplastics (MPs) in invertebrates from the Arctic. We still need to develop harmonized methods to enable good comparison between studies taking into account recovery rates, size ranges, shapes, and polymer types. Here, we review studies on MPs in invertebrates from the Arctic and present suggestions on sampling protocols and potential indicator species. Since information on MPs in Arctic invertebrates is vastly lacking, we recommend to at least include suspension feeding bivalves like mussels in monitoring programmes to function as indicator species in the Arctic. Mussels have also been suggested as indicator species for MP monitoring in coastal regions further south. Although we recognize the challenge with particle selection and egestion in mussels as well as the relatively low concentrations of MPs in Arctic waters, uptake levels seem to represent recent exposures. More research is needed to understand these selection processes and how they affect the bioaccumulation processes. Future research should include studies on whether different functional groups of invertebrates have different exposures to MPs, e.g., if there are differences between sessile versus motile species or different feeding strategies. More knowledge on monitoring strategies for pelagic and benthic species is needed.

Files

2022-microplastics-in-arctic-invertebrates-status-on-occurrence-and-recommendations-for-future-monitoring.pdf

Additional details

Funding

EUROqCHARM – EUROpean quality Controlled Harmonization Assuring Reproducible Monitoring and assessment of plastic pollution 101003805
European Commission