Bridging the gap – how to walk the talk on supporting early career researchers
Creators
- 1. European Network of Research Ethics Committees, Bonn, Germany
- 2. Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- 3. Hasselt University, Hasselt, Flanders, Belgium
- 4. European Association of Research Managers and Administrators, Brussels, Belgium
- 5. University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
- 6. Austrian Agency for Research Integrity, Vienna, Austria
Description
Early career researchers (ECRs) play a crucial role in European and nationally funded research projects. They are at the forefront of planning, conducting, analysing, and reporting research. As part of the SOPs4RI project funded by the European Commission, we, as ECRs and members of this project's consortium, were given the opportunity to reflect on our role, obstacles, and possible opportunities that we experienced. Although several steps have been already taken to support early career researchers, more concrete actions have to be pursued.
In our opinion, the EC should take the lead and serve as a global frontrunner (taken as exemplary also by national funding agencies) in implementing initiatives to support early career researchers during their research trajectory. We opine that the European Commission should explicitly (i) require the creation of a support system in which early career researchers will be able to build new skills and capacity, (ii) encourage and facilitate more involvement of early career researchers in decision-making roles of EC-funded projects, and (iii) provide resources to support career continuity between fixed-term contracts. The suggested actions can help early career researchers build competencies and expertise to establish stability and continuity within the research environment or to embrace and excel in careers outside academia.
Files
openreseurope-3-17145.pdf
Files
(449.5 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:8672a410946ad691ba485dedf7551b1e
|
449.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Cites
- 10.1126/science.adh0336 (DOI)
- 10.1038/d41586-022-03321-3 (DOI)
- 10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008 (DOI)
- 10.1038/nj7677-549a (DOI)
- 10.1080/13613324.2012.730511 (DOI)
References
- Malcom SM, Parikh S (2023). Students and postdocs deserve more. Science. doi:10.1126/science.adh0336
- Singh Chawla D (2022). A road map aims to improve the lives of junior scientists in Europe. Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-03321-3
- Levecque K, Anseel F, De Beuckelaer A (2017). Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Res Pol. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
- Woolston C (2017). Graduate survey: A love–hurt relationship. Nature. doi:10.1038/nj7677-549a
- Annamma SA, Connor D, Ferri B (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethn and Educ. doi:10.1080/13613324.2012.730511