Published September 14, 2023
| Version v1
Annotation collection
Open
ChatGPT v Bard v Bing v Claude 2 v Aria v human-expert. How good are AI chatbots at scientific writing? Supplementa
Creators
- 1. Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Description
This is supplemental material to the article "Fluent but Not Factual: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Other AI Chatbots' Proficiency and Originality in Scientific Writing for Humanities" (https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15100336), which was published as a Pre-print titled "ChatGPT v Bard v Bing v Claude 2 v Aria v human-expert. How good are AI chatbots at scientific writing?" (https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.08636). It includes 3 appendices of tagged data. See the article for more details.
Files
Lozic_Stular_Supplementa.pdf
Files
(4.0 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:a419242009241d2b674d828788c0898b
|
4.0 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is supplement to
- Publication: 10.3390/fi15100336 (DOI)
- Preprint: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.08636 (DOI)