Planned intervention: On Thursday 19/09 between 05:30-06:30 (UTC), Zenodo will be unavailable because of a scheduled upgrade in our storage cluster.

There is a newer version of the record available.

Published September 6, 2023 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Pathogen lifestyle determines host genetic signature of quantitative disease resistance loci in oilseed rape (Brassica napus)

Description

Supplemental datasets associated with publication: Pathogen lifestyle determines host genetic signature of quantitative disease resistance loci in oilseed rape (Brassica napus)

Abstract

  • Crops are affected by several pathogens, but these are rarely studied in parallel to identify common and unique genetic factors controlling diseases. Broad-spectrum quantitative disease resistance (QDR) is desirable for crop breeding as it confers resistance to several pathogen species.
  • Here, we use associative transcriptomics (AT) to identify candidate gene loci associated with Brassica napus QDR to four contrasting fungal pathogens: Alternaria brassicicola, Botrytis cinerea, Pyrenopeziza brassicae and Verticillium longisporum.
  • We did not identify any loci associated with broad-spectrum QDR to fungal pathogens with contrasting lifestyles. Instead, we observed QDR dependent on the lifestyle of the pathogen—hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens had distinct QDR responses and associated loci, including some loci associated with early immunity. Furthermore, we identify a genomic deletion associated with resistance to V. longisporum and potentially broad-spectrum QDR.
  • This is the first time AT has been used for several pathosystems simultaneously to identify host genetic loci involved in broad-spectrum QDR.
  • We highlight candidate loci for broad-spectrum QDR with no antagonistic effects on susceptibility to the other pathogens studies as candidates for crop breeding.

Summary of data files

Table S1  Mean, normalized phenotype data for resistance to pathogens (Alternaria brassicicola, Botrytis cinerea, Pyrenopeziza brassicae and Verticillium longisporum) and ROS response induced by PAMPS (chitin, flg22, and elf18).

Table S2  Full list of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and significance levels from genome-wide association (GWA) analyses for resistance to pathogens (Alternaria brassicicola, Botrytis cinerea, Pyrenopeziza brassicae and Verticillium longisporum) and ROS response induced by PAMPS (chitin, flg22, and elf18).

Table S3  Full list of gene expression markers (GEMs) and significance levels from GEM analyses for resistance to pathogens (Alternaria brassicicola, Botrytis cinerea, Pyrenopeziza brassicae and Verticillium longisporum) and ROS response induced by PAMPS (chitin, flg22, and elf18).

Table S4  184 gene expression markers (GEMs) associated with chitin-induced ROS compared with GEMs associated with resistance to pathogens (Alternaria brassicicola, Botrytis cinerea, Pyrenopeziza brassicae and Verticillium longisporum) and ROS response induced by flg22, and elf18. Lists correspond to Venn diagrams in Fig. 2.

Table S5  Enrichment analyses to determine if the number of gene expression markers (GEMs) shared between different lists is greater than the number of GEMs that would be expected by chance (e.g., lists of quantitative disease resistance (QDR) GEMs for two fungal pathogens).

Table S6  Results from Weighted Co-expression Gene Network Analysis. Significant modules, significant GEM markers within modules, and GO terms associated with the magenta and black modules are indicated.

Table S7  Shared gene expression markers (GEMs) associated with resistance to different pathogens (Alternaria brassicicola, Botrytis cinerea, Pyrenopeziza brassicae and Verticillium longisporum). Lists correspond to matrices and Venn diagrams in Fig. 1.

Table S8  List of genes in linkage disequilibrium with the top marker for Verticillium longisporum resistance from genome-wide association (GWA) analysis on chromosome A09, the homoeologous region on C08, and their query coverage in Brassica napus reference genotypes

 

Extended description of data files

Table S1 Mean, normalized phenotype data for resistance to pathogens (Alternaria brassicicola, Botrytis cinerea, Pyrenopeziza brassicae and Verticillium longisporum) and ROS response induced by PAMPS (chitin, flg22, and elf18). These data were used for association transcriptomic analysis. 

Table S2 Full list of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and significance levels from genome-wide association (GWA) analyses for resistance to pathogens (Alternaria brassicicola, Botrytis cinerea, Pyrenopeziza brassicae and Verticillium longisporum) and ROS response induced by PAMPS (chitin, flg22, and elf18). Each excel tab contains the analyses for a single trait. The best fit model for GWA analysis is indicated in the tab title. Manhattan plots showing marker-trait association are included for data visualization; x-axis indicates SNP location along the chromosome; the y-axis indicates the -log10(p) (P value). Qqplots are included to demonstrate model fit.

Table S3 Full list of gene expression markers (GEMs) and significance levels from GEM analyses for resistance to pathogens (Alternaria brassicicola, Botrytis cinerea, Pyrenopeziza brassicae and Verticillium longisporum) and ROS response induced by PAMPS (chitin, flg22, and elf18). Each excel tab contains the analyses for a single trait. Manhattan plots showing marker-trait association are included for data visualization; x-axis indicates GEM location along the chromosome; the y-axis indicates the -log10(p) (P value). 

Table S4 184 gene expression markers (GEMs) associated with chitin-induced ROS compared with GEMs associated with resistance to pathogens (Alternaria brassicicola, Botrytis cinerea, Pyrenopeziza brassicae and Verticillium longisporum) and ROS response induced by flg22, and elf18. Lists correspond to Venn diagrams in Fig. 2. The first tab includes all 184 GEMs associated with chitin-induced ROS. The subsequent tabs include lists of shared GEMs associated with chitin-induced ROS response and each additional trait (quantitative disease resistance (QDR) to each fungal pathogen or additional PAMP-induced ROS responses). The title of each tab indicates the data included in each comparison and the number of shared GEMs. Predicted Arabidopsis thaliana orthologs and corresponding descriptions are shown where possible. 

Table S5 Enrichment analyses to determine if the number of gene expression markers (GEMs) shared between different lists is greater than the number of GEMs that would be expected by chance (e.g., lists of quantitative disease resistance (QDR) GEMs for two fungal pathogens). The representation factor is the number of overlapping GEMs divided by the expected number of overlapping GEMs drawn from two independent groups (traits), considering the total number of GEMs sequenced (53884). A representation factor > 1 indicates more overlap than expected of two groups, a representation factor < 1 indicates less overlap than expected, and a representation factor of 1 indicates that the two groups by the number of genes expected for independent groups of genes. 

Table S6 Results from Weighted Co-expression Gene Network Analysis (WGCNA). The first tab indicates significant modules from WGCNA analysis. Black and magenta modules are associated with antagonistic effects on resistance/susceptibility to all four pathogens. The second tab includes a full list of the GEM markers (Table S3), which are in significant WGCNA modules. The third, fourth and, fifth tabs indicate all significant GEMs in the black module,  GO terms associated with GEMs in the black module, and all GO terms associated with the black module, respectively.  The sixth, seventh and, eighth tabs indicate all significant GEMs in the magenta module,  GO terms associated with GEMs in the magenta module, and all GO terms associated with the magenta module, respectively.

Table S7 Shared gene expression markers (GEMs) associated with resistance to different pathogens (Alternaria brassicicola, Botrytis cinerea, Pyrenopeziza brassicae and Verticillium longisporum). Lists correspond to matrices and Venn diagrams in Fig. 3. The first tab includes all GEMs associated quantitative disease resistance (QDR) to the fungal pathogens. The subsequent tabs include lists of shared GEMs associated with QDR to two or more fungal pathogens. The title of each tab indicates the data included in each comparison and the number of shared GEMs. Predicted Arabidopsis thaliana orthologs and corresponding descriptions are shown where possible. 

Table S8 List of genes in linkage disequilibrium with the top marker for Verticillium longisporum resistance from genome-wide association (GWA) analysis on chromosome A09 (107 genes)(Tab 1) and the homoeologous region on C08 (Tab 2). Their percentage identity and query coverage in Brassica napus reference genotypes Quinta, Tapidor, Westar and Zhongshuang 11 compared to the B. napus pantranscriptome is indicated. Predicted Arabidopsis thaliana orthologs and corresponding descriptions are shown where possible.  

 

Notes

VKM and AKK were supported by the National Center for Research and Development, Poland (grant no. ERA-CAPS II/1/2015). XZ and AvT were supported by the German Research Foundation (grant no. ERA-CAPS DFG; TI170/13–1). HJS, RW, RB, CJR, HF, GKM, HUS and BDLF were funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) grants BB/N005007/1 and BB/N005112/1 (as part of the ERA-CAPS consortium "MAQBAT"). HJS, RW, CNJ, RB and CJR were also funded by the John Innes Institute strategic program grants Plant Health BB/P012574/1 (Response BBS/E/J/000PR9796) and Molecules from Nature BB/PO12523/1, Brassica Rapeseed and Vegetable Optimisation (BRAVO) BB/P003095/1.

Files

Files (156.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:834e3303ceb186958f61b1b9a9dc91a7
24.8 kB Download
md5:9d57a410f78f3ca60fa6d15197cf5cd9
121.4 MB Download
md5:cbdff3333c8b03e4d47b0a53c989f619
27.3 MB Download
md5:b10b605fd9c3eff1a89437de564afa0f
1.4 MB Download
md5:cd9434ce5a1294fc25419fa9312afff6
12.0 kB Download
md5:6eac14dc4cda9a76ca4d1b0c3858d450
5.9 MB Download
md5:68e46101818f375a2782302b56ee0354
125.1 kB Download
md5:d7e3854ff28465b7ae5e8a3b9623c2d3
42.2 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is supplement to
Preprint: 10.1101/2023.08.02.551671 (DOI)

Funding

14 ERA-CAPS: Mechanistic Analysis of Quantitative Disease Resistance in Brassica by Associative Transcriptomics BB/N005007/1
UK Research and Innovation
14 ERA-CAPS Mechanistic Analysis of Quantitative Disease Resistance in Brassica by Associative Transcriptomics BB/N005112/1
UK Research and Innovation