There is a newer version of the record available.

Published August 1, 2023 | Version 1.2
Preprint Open

A practical guide to data management and sharing for biomedical laboratory researchers

  • 1. Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • 2. Department of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
  • 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Weill Institutes for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Weill Institutes for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • 5. Center for Neuroscience, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States; Northern California Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Martinez, CA, United States
  • 6. Department of Computer Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States
  • 7. Department of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA, United States
  • 8. Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center and Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
  • 9. School of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada; Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Neurosurgery, Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Weill Institutes for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States

Description

Effective data management and sharing have become increasingly crucial in biomedical research; however, many laboratory researchers lack the necessary tools and knowledge to address this challenge. This article provides an introductory guide into research data management (RDM), and the importance of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data-sharing principles for laboratory researchers produced by practicing scientists. We explore the advantages of implementing organized data management strategies and introduce key concepts such as data standards, data documentation, and the distinction between machine and human-readable data formats. Furthermore, we offer practical guidance for creating a data management plan and establishing efficient data workflows within the laboratory setting, suitable for labs of all sizes. This includes an examination of requirements analysis, the development of a data dictionary for routine data elements, the implementation of unique subject identifiers, and the formulation of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for seamless data flow. To aid researchers in implementing these practices, we present a simple organizational system as an illustrative example, which can be tailored to suit individual needs and research requirements.

By presenting a user-friendly approach, this guide serves as an introduction to the field of RDM and offers practical tips to help researchers effortlessly meet the common data management and sharing mandates rapidly becoming prevalent in biomedical research.

Files

A practical guide to data collection and sharing.pdf

Files (4.9 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:275925810cdc795dc62469b5e40f76fd
3.0 MB Download
md5:523b8260b082920cc65e25c5507fc7e4
1.3 MB Preview Download
md5:8778149c07b68d72594ebf163a37d3a3
582.0 kB Download