Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published January 15, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

The Male Hindwing Costal Roll in Cochylina (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): Morphological Variation, Phylogenetic Distribution, and Relationship to Host Utilization

Creators

  • 1. Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, Calle Catedrático José Beltrán, 2, 46980-Valencia, Spain,
  • 2. Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA, and

Description

Pérez Santa-Rita, José V., Brown, John W., Baixeras, Joaquín (2022): The Male Hindwing Costal Roll in Cochylina (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): Morphological Variation, Phylogenetic Distribution, and Relationship to Host Utilization. Insect Systematics and Diversity 6 (1): 1-22, DOI: 10.1093/isd/ixab030, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixab030

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:946CFF95FF983C51C153F1471D67FF95

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315428 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315434 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315438 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315440 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315442 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315444 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315446 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315448 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315450 (DOI)

References

  • Abouheif, E. 1999. A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 895-909.
  • Allen, C. E., B. J. Zwaan, and P. M. Brakefield. 2011. Evolution of sexual dimorphism in the Lepidoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56: 445-464.
  • Almeida-Neto, M., P. Guimaraes, P. R. Guimaraes, R. D. Loyola, and W. Ulrich. 2008. A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos. 117: 1227-1239.
  • Atmar, W., and B. D. Patterson. 1993. The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96: 373-382.
  • Baixeras, J. 2002. An overview of genus level taxonomic problems surrounding Argyroploce Hubner (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae), with descriptions of a new species. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 95: 422-431.
  • Bapteste, E., and P. Huneman. 2018. Towards a dynamic interaction network of life to unify and expand the evolutionary theory. BMC Biol. 16: 56.
  • Barth, R. 1980. Consideracoes gerais e especificas sobre as glandulas cutaneas sexuais dos Lepidopteras. Mem. Instit. Oswaldo Cruz 75: 129-140.
  • Bascompte, J, and P. Jordano. 2007. Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 567-593.
  • Basset Y., L. R. Jorge, P. T. Butterill, G. P. A. Lamarre, C. Dahl, R. Ctvrtecka, S. Gripenberg, O. T. Lewis, H. Barrios, J. W. Brown, et al. 2021. Host specificity and interaction networks of insects feeding on seeds and fruits in tropical rainforests. Oikos 130: 1462-1476.
  • Bastian, M., S. Heymann, and M. Jacomy. 2009. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Paper presented at the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, May 17-20, 2009, San Jose, California.
  • Beckett, S. J., C. A. Boulton, and H. T. P. Williams. 2014. FALCON: a software package for analysis of nestedness in bipartite networks (v1; ref status:approved 1, http://f1000r.es/3z8). F1000Res 3:185.
  • Bernays, E. A., and R. F. Chapman. 1994. Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Contemporary topics in Entomology 2. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  • Birch, M. C., G. M. Poppy, and T. C. Baker. 1990. Scents and eversible scent structures of male moths. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35: 25-58.
  • Blondel, V. D., J. L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of community hierarchies in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. 10: P10008.
  • Bolte, K. B. 1996. Techniques for obtaining scanning electron micrographs of minute arthropods. J. Entomol. Soc. Ont. 127: 67-87.
  • Boppre, M. 1984. Chemically mediated interactions between butterflies, pp. 259-275. In I. Vane-Wright and P. R. Ackery (eds.), Biology of the butterflies. Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London. Academic Press, London.
  • Borrero-Echeverry, F., M. Bengtsson, K. Nakamuta, and P. Witzgall. 2018. Plant odor and sex pheromone are integral elements of specific mate recognition in an insect herbivore. Evolution. 72: 2225-2233.
  • Brandes, U. 2001. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J. Math. Sociol. 25: 163-177.
  • Brown, R. L. 1983. Taxonomic and morphological investigations of Olethreutinae: Rhopobota, Griselda, Melissopus, and Cydia (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Entomography 2: 97-120.
  • Brown, J. W. 2019. New genera, new species, and new combinations in New World Cochylina (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae). Zootaxa 4671: 195-222.
  • Brown, R. L., and P. R. Miller. 1983. Studies of Lepidoptera hindwings with emphasis on ultrastructure of scales in Cydia caryana (Fitch) (Tortricidae). Entomography 2: 261-295.
  • Brown, J. W., and S. Passoa. 1998. Larval foodplants of Euliini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): from Abies to Vitis. Pan-Pac. Entomol. 74: 1-11.
  • Brown, J. W., G. Robinson, and J. A. Powell. 2008. Food plant database of the leafrollers of the world (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae) (Version 1.0). http:// www.tortricid.net/foodplants.asp (accessed January 2021).
  • Brown, J. W., L. Aarvik, M. Heikkila, R. L. Brown and M. Mutanen. 2019. Molecular phylogeny of Cochylina, with confirmation of its relationship to Euliina (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae). Syst. Entomol. 45: 160-174.
  • Cates, R. G. 1980. Feeding patterns of monophagous, oligophagous, and polyphagous insect herbivores: the effect of resource abundance and plant chemistry. Oecologia. 46: 22-31.
  • Conner, W. E., and V. K. Iyengar. 2016. Male pheromones in moths: Reproductive isolation, sexy sons, and good genes, pp. 191-208. In J. D. Allison and R. T. Carde (eds.), Pheromone communication in moths: evolution, behavior, and application. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
  • Davis, D. R. 1986. A new family of monotrysian moths from austral South America (Lepidoptera: Palaephatidae), with a phylogenetic review of the Monotrysia. Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 434: 1-202.
  • Dombroskie, J. J., and F. A. H. Sperling. 2013. Phylogeny of the tribe Archipini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and evolutionary correlates of novel sexual structures. Zootaxa. 3729: 1-62.
  • Dormann, C. F., B. Gruber, and J. Fruend. 2008. Introducing the bipartite package: analysing ecological networks. R News 8: 8-11.
  • Ellis, E. A., and M. W. Pendleton. 2007. Vapor coating: a simple, economical procedure for preparing difficult specimens for scanning electron microscopy. Micros. Today 14: 44-45.
  • Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1: 215-239.
  • Gilligan, T. M., J. Baixeras, and J. W. Brown. 2018. T@RTS: online world catalogue of the Tortricidae (Ver. 4.0). (http://tortricidae.com/catalogue. asp) (accessed January 2021).
  • Gonzalez, F., F. Borrero-Echeverry, J. K. Josvai, M. Strandh, C. R. Unelius, M. Toth, P. Witzgall, M. Bengtsson, and W. B. Walker. III. 2020. Odorant receptor phylogeny confirms conserved channels for sex pheromone and host plant signals in tortricid moths. Ecol. Evol. 10: 7334-7348.
  • Grant, G. G. 1978. Morphology of the presumed male pheromone glands on the forewings of tortricid and phycitid moths. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 71: 423-431.
  • Greenfield, M. D. 2002. Signalers and receivers: mechanisms and evolution of arthropod communication. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Hall, J. P. W., and D. J. Harvey. 2002. A survey of androconial organs in the Riodinidae (Lepidoptera). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 136: 171-197.
  • Hallberg, E., and G. Poppy. 2003. Exocrine glands: chemical communication and chemical defense, pp. 361-375. In N. P. Kristensen (ed.), Lepidoptera, moths and butterflies, Vol. 2. Morphology, Physiology, and Development. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.
  • Hood, J. D. 1953. Microscopical whole-mounts of insects. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • Horak, Μ. 1984. Assessment of taxonomically significant structures in Tortricinae (Lep.: Tortricidae). Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 57: 3-64.
  • Horak, M. 1991. Morphology, pp. 1-22. In L. P. S. van der Geest and H. H. Evenhuis (eds.), World crop pests, 5: tortricid pests, their biology natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • Horak, M. 1998. The Tortricoidea, pp. 199-215. In: N. P. Kristensen (ed.), Lepidoptera: moths and butterflies. 1. Evolution, systematics, and biogeography. Handbook of zoology Vol. IV, Part 35. De Gruyter, Berlin and New York.
  • Horak, M., and F. B. Common. 1985. A revision of the australian genus Epitymbia Meyrick, with remarks on the Epitymbiini (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). Aust. J. Zool. 33: 577-622.
  • IPNI. 2021. The international plant names index. Available from http://www. ipni.org (continuously updated; accessed November 2021).
  • Jacomy, M., T. Venturini, S. Heymann, and M. Bastian. 2014. ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the gephi software. PloS One 9: e98679.
  • Jin, Y., and H. Qian. 2019. V.PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants. Ecography 42: 1353-1359.
  • Jombart, T., F. Balloux,and S. Dray. 2010. adephylo:new tools for investigating the phylogenetic signal in biological traits. Bioinformatics 26: 1907-1909.
  • Jordano, P., J. Bascompte, and J. M. Olesen. 2003. Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions. Ecol.Lett. 6: 69-81.
  • Kennel, J. 1908. Die palaearktischen Tortriciden. Zoologica 21(54): 1-100, pl. 1-6. Stuttgart.
  • Kondoh, M., S. Kato, and Y. Sakato. 2010. Food webs are built up with nested subwebs. Ecology 91: 3123-3130.
  • Krasnoff, S.B. 1997. Evolution of male lepidopteran pheromones: a phylogenetic perspective, pp. 490-504. In R. T. Carde and A. K. Minks (eds.), Insect pheromone research: new directions. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  • Kristensen, N. P., T. J. Simonsen. 2003. 'Hairs' and scales, pp. 9-22. In N. P. Kristensen (ed.), Lepidoptera: moths and butterflies 2. Handbuch der Zoologie/Handbook of Zoology IV/36. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.
  • Kumar, S., G. Stecher, M. Li, C. Knyaz, and K. Tamura. 2018. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35: 1547-1549.
  • Lambiotte, R., J. C. Delvenne, and M. Barahona. 2008. Laplacian dynamics and multiscale modular structure in networks. arXiv: Physics and Society 2008: 1, May 17-20, 2009, San Jose, California.
  • Lee, J. K., S. M. Ryu, and M. K. Lee. 1998. A morphological study on the androconia of the Lycaenidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera), in Korea. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 37: 39-48.
  • Maddison, D. R., D. L. Swofford, and W. Maddison. 1997. Nexus: an extensible file format for systematic information. Syst. Biol. 46: 590-621.
  • Mandel, J. R., R. B. Dikow, C. M. Siniscalchi, R. Thapa, L. E. Watson, and V. A. Funk. 2019. A fully resolved backbone phylogeny reveals numerous dispersals and explosive diversifications throughout the history of Asteraceae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 116(28): 14083-14088.
  • Martins, A. R. P., M. Duarte, and R. K. Robbins. 2018. Hairstreak butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) and evolution of their male secondary sexual organs. Cladistics. 35: 173-197.
  • Mitter, C., and B. Farrell. 1991. Macroevolutionary aspects of insect-plant relationships, pp. 35-78. In E. A. Bernays (ed.) Insect-plant interactions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  • Mossa, S., M. Barthelemy, H. E. Stanley, and L. A. N. Amaral. 2002. Truncation of power law behavior in 'scale-free' network models due to information filtering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88: 138701.
  • Muller, F. 1877. Uber haarpinsel, filzflecke und ahnliche gebilde auf den flugeln mannlicher schmetterlinge. Jena. Z. Med. Naturwiss. 11: 99-114.
  • Munkemuller, T., S. Lavergne, B. Bzeznik, S. Dray, T. Jombart, K. Schiffers, and W. Thuiller. 2012. How to measure and test phylogenetic signal. Methods. Ecol. Evol. 3: 743-756.
  • Muto-Fujita, A., K. Takemoto, S. Kanaya, T. Nakazato, T. Toki-Matsu, N. Matsumoto, M. Kono, Y. Chubachi, K. Ozaki, and M. Kotera. 2017. Data integration aids understanding of butterfly-host plant network. Sci. Rep. 7: 43368.
  • Newman, M. E. 2003. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 45: 167-256.
  • Nieukerken, E. J. V. 1986. Systematics and phylogeny of Holarctic genera of Nepticulidae (Lepidoptera, Heteroneura: Monotrysia). Zool.Verhan. 236: 1-93.
  • Nieukerken, E. J. V. 1990. Stigmella rolandi sp. n.: a widespread southern European species on Rosa (Lepidoptera: Nepticulidae). Tijdschr. Entomol. 133: 239-243.
  • Omura, H., T. Itoh, D. Wright, H. Pavulaan, and S. Schroder. 2015. A morphological study of alar androconia in Celastrina butterflies. Entomol. Sci. 18: 353-359.
  • Ono, T. 1979. Brush organs of the potato tuber moth: morphology, histology and preliminary examination of its function. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 14: 432-437.
  • Pavoine, S., S. Ollier, D. Pontier, and D. Chessel. 2008. Testing for phylogenetic signal in phenotypic traits: new matrices of phylogenetic proximities. Theor. Popul. Biol. 73: 79-91.
  • Phelan, P. L. 1992. Evolution of sex pheromones and the role of asymmetric tracking, pp. 265-314. In B. D. Roitberg and M. B. Isman (eds.), Insect chemical ecology: an evolutionary approach. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  • Phelan, P. L. 1997. Evolution of mate-signaling in moths: phylogenetic considerations and predictions from the asymmetric tracking hypothesis, pp. 240-256. In C. Choe and B. Crespi (eds.), The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Phelan, P. L., and T. C. Baker. 1987. Evolution of male pheromones in moths- reproductive isolation through sexual selection. Science 235: 205-207.
  • Proulx, S. R., D. E. Promislow, and P. C. Phillips. 2005. Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 20: 345-53.
  • Qian, H., and Y. Jin. 2016. An updated megaphylogeny of plants, a tool for generating plant phylogenies and an analysis of phylogenetic community structure. J. Plant. Ecol. 9: 233-239.
  • Rambaut, A. 2011. FigTree v1.4.4. (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).
  • Ratnasingham, S., and P. D. N. Hebert. 2007. BOLD: the barcode of life data system (www.barcodinglife.org). Mol. Ecol. Notes. 7: 355-364.
  • Razowski, J., and V. Becker.2007. Systematic and faunistic data on Neotropical Cochylin i (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae), with description of new species. Part 2. Acta zoologica cracoviensia. 50B: 91-128.
  • R Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R J. (https://www.R-project.org/).
  • Revell, L. J., L. J. Harmon, and D. C. Collar. 2008. Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Syst. Biol. 57: 591-601.
  • Robbins, R. K., M. D. Heredia, and R. C. Busby. 2015. Male secondary sexual structures and the systematics of the Thereus oppia species group (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Eumaeini). Zookeys 520: 109-130.
  • Ruhnau, B. 2000. Eigenvector-centrality-a node-centrality? Soc. Networks 22: 357-365.
  • Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425.
  • Song, H., and S. R. Bucheli. 2010. Comparison of phylogenetic signal between male genitalia and non-genital characters in insect systematics.Cladistics 26: 23-35.
  • Staude, H. S. 1996. Observations on lek behaviour and the description of male scent disseminating structures of Callioratis abraxas Felder, 1974 (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Metamorphosis 7: 121-126.
  • Strona, G., P. Galli, D. Seveso, S. Montano, and S. Fattorini. 2014a. Nestedness for Dummies (NeD): a user friendly web interface for exploratory nestedness analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 59: 1-9. Software available at: http:// ecosoft.alwaysdata.net (accessed January 2021).
  • Strona, G., D. Nappo, F. Boccacci, S. Fattorini, and J. San-Miguel-Ayanz. 2014b. A fast and unbiased procedure to randomize ecological binary matrices with fixed row and column totals. Nat. Commun. 5: 4114.
  • Thebault, E., and C. Fontaine. 2010. Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science 329: 853-856.
  • The Plant List. 2013. Version 1.1. Published on the Internet; http://www. theplantlist.org (accessed January 2021).
  • Thevenaz, P., and M. Unser. 2007. User-friendly semiautomated assembly of accurate image mosaics in microscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech. 70: 135-146.
  • Tooker, J. F., and D. Giron. 2020. The evolution of endophagy in herbivorous insects. Front. Plant. Sci. 11: 581816.
  • Vazquez, D. P., N. Bluthgen, L. Cagnolo, and N. P. Chacoff. 2009. Uniting pattern and process in plant-animal mutualistic networks: a review. Ann. Bot. 103:1445-1457.
  • West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58: 155-183.
  • Wiens, J. J. 2001. Widespread loss of sexually selected traits: how the peacock lost its spots. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 16: 517-523.