Published August 28, 2023 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: Macroecological predictors of evolutionary and plastic potential do not apply at microgeographic scales for a freshwater Cladoceran under climate change

  • 1. Schoodic Institute
  • 2. University of Connecticut

Description

Rapid evolutionary adaptation could reduce the negative impacts of climate change if sufficient heritability of key traits exists under future climate conditions. Plastic responses to climate change could also reduce negative impacts. Understanding which populations are likely to respond via evolution or plasticity could therefore improve estimates of extinction risk. A large body of research suggests that the evolutionary and plastic potential of a population can be predicted by the degree of spatial and temporal climatic variation it experiences. However, we know little about the scale at which these relationships apply. Here, we test if spatial and temporal variation in temperature affect genetic variation and plasticity of fitness and a key thermal tolerance trait (critical thermal maximum; CTmax) at microgeographic scales using a metapopulation of Daphnia magna. Specifically, we ask if: (1) there is microgeographic adaptation of CTmax and fitness to differences in temperature among the pools, (2) pools with greater temporal temperature variation have more genetic variation or plasticity in CTmax or fitness, and (3) increases in temperature affect the heritability of CTmax and fitness. Although we observed genetic variation and plasticity in CTmax and fitness, and differences in fitness among pools, we did not find support for the predicted relationships between temperature variation and genetic variation or plasticity. Furthermore, the genetic variation and plasticity we observed in CTmax is unlikely sufficient to reduce the impacts of climate change. CTmax plasticity was minimal and heritability was 72% lower when D. magna developed at the higher temperatures predicted under climate change. In contrast, the heritability of fitness increased by 53% under warmer temperatures suggesting an increase in overall evolutionary potential unrelated to CTmax under climate change. More research is needed to understand evolutionary and plastic potential under climate change and how that potential will be altered in future climates.

Notes

Funding provided by: Schoodic Institute*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: University of Connecticut
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007710
Award Number:

Funding provided by: University of Connecticut
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007710
Award Number:

Files

FinalCodeAndData.zip

Files (81.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:fe7f5ae5de153baf077f49efe8496bac
80.9 kB Preview Download
md5:2d4e8cd944d3d9ff97182e0b8ba10e0c
518 Bytes Preview Download