Published August 24, 2023 | Version Published
Journal article Open

Infant Button Battery Injury and Death (IBBID): Legal Remedies and Options for Redress

Creators

  • 1. University of Tasmania

Description

 

Infant button battery injury and death (IBBID) is a known worldwide risk for pre-school age children. An ingested button battery that lodges in a child’s oesophagus will be fatal for the child if the button battery is not promptly removed. Button batteries of 20 mm diameter (e.g. CR2032) present a serious risk of such lodgement if ingested, they are in common usage (for example in many car key-fobs), and are readily available in supermarkets. Where such a button battery is removed (say by medical intervention) the child may be permanently disabled. It is the diameter of such button batteries (≥20 mm) that leads to lodgement and the electrical charge of such batteries that will cause tissue chemical burn, which, will likely be fatal if the burn creates a fistula (tunnel) through to an organ adjacent to the oesophagus (e.g., a tracheoesophageal fistula joins the windpipe and the gullet). Seven legal options for action are considered in the present paper, with ratings of cost, duration, and potential sources of funding (for the UK): Class action; Representative action; Individual action; Prevention of Future Death Report; Household insurance; Judicial review; and medical negligence. At present injured children ‘suffer in silence’ and some die, but if the harms of IBBID are sufficiently monetised, then it can be anticipated that the dangerous button batteries will price themselves out of the market and manufacturers and suppliers will seek alternatives (e.g. different size, different chemistry, different design). 

 

Notes

Button batteries (BB) are small coin-size batteries that are used in many car key-fobs and numerous other consumer items including toys. Common button batteries, (e.g. CR2032 and CR2025) will cause death if swallowed by a child and the battery lodges in the oesophagus and is not promptly removed by medical or other intervention. These common batteries are 20 mm in diameter and are too big to pass through the gullet of infants. Young children have a propensity for exploration and that includes ingesting foreign objects.

Files

Paull2023.IBBID.ejlawpolitics.pdf

Files (705.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a1714d27da381bccf7ad827e5457e5e8
705.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Abdulkareem, I., Sabir, O. M., & Elamin, A. (2011). Button battery induced traumatic tracheoesophageal fistula: Case report and review of literature. Sudanese Journal of Paediatrics, 11(2), 43-49.
  • OPSS. (2021). OPSS supports new standard for battery safety - Button and coin batteries safety standard, PAS 7055:2021, is published and free to download. London: Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) (gov.uk).
  • OPSS. (2023a). OPSS Product Safety and Consumers: Wave 3 BEIS Research Paper. London: Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) (gov.uk). February.
  • OPSS. (2023b). OPSS Product Safety and Consumers: Wave 3 BEIS Technical Report. London: Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) (gov.uk). January
  • Paull, J. (2021). Button batteries and child deaths: Market failure of unsafe products. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Research, 5(3), 297-303.
  • Paull, J. (2022). Silent Nursery: Button Battery Fatalities in Children — the Long Road from Externality to Obsolescence. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Research, 6(3), 301-308.