Published August 4, 2023 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Loboscelidia fulgens Kimsey 2012

  • 1. Entomological Laboratory, Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Sciences, Kyushu University, 744, Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 819 - 0395, Japan. & Ogasawara Division of Japan Wildlife Research Center, Okumura, Chichijima, Ogasawara, Tokyo 100 - 2101, Japan.
  • 2. Mientrung Institute for Scientific Research, Vietnam National Museum of Nature, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 321 Huynh Thuc Khang, Hue, Vietnam. & Graduate School of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • 3. Entomological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 744, Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819 - 0395 Japan.

Description

Loboscelidia fulgens Kimsey, 2012

Figs 2C, 3B, 13, 25I

Loboscelidia fulgens Kimsey, 2012: 16.

Holotype ♂; Vietnam: Tuyen Quang Province, Na Hang Nature Reserve (CNC).

Material examined

Paratypes VIETNAM • 1 ♂; Ha Tinh province, Huong Son; 450 m a.s.l.; 18°22′ N, 105°13′ E; 22 Apr.–1 May 1998; L. Herman leg.; light trap; CNC • 1 ♂; Tuyen Quang province, Na Hang Reserve; 360 m a.s.l.; 16–20 May 1997; S.B. Peck leg.; FIT; CNC.

Non-type

VIETNAM • 5 ♂♂; Bac Giang Province, Tay Yen Tu NR; 21°10′52.33″ N, 106°43′24.3″ E; 9 Jul. 2014; T. Mita leg.; VNMN • 5 ♂♂; same locality data as for preceding but 21°11′3.65″ N; 106°44′42.44″ E; 10 Jul. 2014; K. Tsujii leg.; VNMN.

Description

Male (Fig. 13A)

MEASUREMENTS. Body length 2.4–3.1 mm; forewing length 2.7–3.2 mm.

HEAD. Head (Fig. 13B–D) 1.8 times as long as high, 1.1 times as long as wide; inner ocular length 0.67 times as long as head width; frontal projection rectangular in frontal view (Fig. 13C); apical margion of frontal projection depressed (Fig. 13D); frons polished and unpunctured (Fig. 13D); frons with low ridge extending from median ocellus along inner orbit of eye (Fig. 13D); frons with indistinct carinae towards median ocellus (Fig. 13C); frons with distinct frontal line; spraclypeal area with transverse carinae; temple 0.64 times as long as MOD (Fig. 13D); POL 1.2 times as long as MOD; OOL as long as MOD; LOL 0.40 times as long as MOD; behind ocelli with transverse depression; cervical expansion convex in lateral view (Fig. 13B); basal part of cervical expansion constricted in dorsal view (Fig. 13D); scape 3.6 times as long as wide; scape with longitudinal grooves; F1 2.2 times as long as wide; F2 1.8 times as long as wide; F11 3.0 times as long as wide; relative length of F1–F11: 1.3: 1.1: 1.0: 1.0: 1.0: 1.1: 1.0: 1.1: 1.1: 1.1: 1.6.

MESOSOMA. Pronotum 0.81 times as long as posterior width of pronotum (Fig. 13F); posterior width of pronotum 1.3 times as wide as anterior width and 0.90 times as wide as head width; dorsolateral surface of pronotum rounded (Fig. 13A); notauli of scutum slightly curved, reaching posterior margin (Fig. 13G); scutellum polished, with lateral carina (Fig. 13G); apico-lateral area of scutellum without longitudinal carina (Fig. 13G); scrobal sulcus absent (Fig. 13A); metanotum with two ridges; metanotum 0.31 times as long as scutellum (Fig. 13G); propodeal angle weakly developed; propodeum without transverse carina above foramen.

WINGS. Forewing (Fig. 13E) with M absent; cu-a absent; A extending half of Cu+M; R1 0.33 times as long as R; Rs 1.7 times as long as R.

LEGS. Tibiae carinate; flange on forefemur 0.35 times longer, as wide as tubular part of forefemur; flange on foretibia 0.34 times longer, 0.33 times wider than tubular part of foretibia; flange on midfemur 0.66 times longer, 0.70 times wider than tubular part of midfemur; flange on midtibia 0.58 times longer, 0.33 times wider than tubular part of midtibia; hindcoxa 2.3 times as long as hind trochanter; hindcoxa dorso-laterally carinate; basal part of hindfemur simple; hindfemur basally not stout, as wide as distal part; ventral margin of hindfemur swollen; flange on hindfemur 0.48 times longer, as wide as tubular part of hindfemur; outer surface of hindtibia smooth; flange on hindtibia 0.54 times longer, 0.75 times wider than tubular part of hindtibia.

PILOSITY. Forecoxa with sparse decumbent simple setae; foretibia with sparse decumbent and erect simple setae; midcoxa with sparse decumbent simple setae; midfemur with sparse decumbent and suberect simple setae; midtibia with sparse decumbent and suberect simple setae; hindcoxa with sparse decumbent simple setae; hindfemur with sparse decumbent cuneate setae; hindtibia with sparse decumbent and suberect simple setae.

COLORATION. Body yellowish brown; antenna yellowish brown; legs yellowish brown; ribbon-like setae whitish yellow.

Female

Unknown.

Distribution

Vietnam (Northern Vietnam, Central Vietnam) (Fig. 27).

Remarks

Loboscelidia fulgens shares a completely lacking M vein with L. bakeri Fouts, 1922, L. guangxiensis Xu, Weng & He, 2006 and L. reducta. However, L. fulgens can be distinguished from the three species by the following characteristics: head wider than posterior width of pronotum (narrower than posterior width of pronotum in L. bakeri and L. reducta); R1 0.30 times as long as R (more than 0.50 times as long as R in L. guangxiensis); a flange on hindtibia more than 0.50 times as wide as tubular part of hindtibia (less wide than hindtibia in L. guangxiensis); well-developed tibial flanges (lacking in L. reducta); and propodeum without a transverse carina (with the carina in L. bakeri).

Notes

Published as part of Hisasue, Yu, Pham, Thai-Hong & Mita, Toshiharu, 2023, Taxonomic revision of the genus Loboscelidia Westwood, 1874 (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae: Loboscelidiinae) from Vietnam, pp. 1-68 in European Journal of Taxonomy 887 (1) on pages 29-31, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.887.2203, http://zenodo.org/record/8222523

Files

Files (5.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a9974af67ddbe1a2d991ae7d0d13c3b0
5.4 kB Download

System files (42.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7b0ded549079995e9fd4285b59015224
42.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Collection code
CNC , FIT, CNC , VNMN
Event date
1997-05-16 , 1998-04-22 , 2014-07-09 , 2014-07-10
Family
Chrysididae
Genus
Loboscelidia
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Hymenoptera
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Kimsey
Species
fulgens
Taxon rank
species
Type status
holotype , paratype
Verbatim event date
1997-05-16/20 , 1998-04-22/05-01 , 2014-07-09 , 2014-07-10
Taxonomic concept label
Loboscelidia fulgens Kimsey, 2012 sec. Hisasue, Pham & Mita, 2023

References

  • Kimsey L. S. 2012. Review of the odd chrysidid genus Loboscelidia Westwood, 1874 (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae, Loboscelidiinae). ZooKeys 213: 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 213.2985
  • Fouts R. M. 1922. New parasitic Hymenoptera from the Oriental islands. The Philippine Journal of Science 20: 619 - 637. https: // doi. org / 10.5281 / zenodo. 26811