Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

The MoreBrains Cooperative

There is a newer version of the record available.

Published July 27, 2023 | Version v1
Report Restricted

"If we use the strength of diversity among researchers we can only improve the quality and impact of our research": Issues of equality, diversity, inclusion, and transparency in the process of applying for research funding

Creators

  • 1. Research Support & Development Office, Brunel University London
  • 2. Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol
  • 3. MoreBrains Cooperative
  • 4. Faculty of Health Sciences, Bristol Vet School
  • 5. RoRI
  • 6. Academic Capacity Development Co-Lead, Leeds NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  • 7. University of Leicester
  • 8. Elizabeth Blackwell Institute, University of Bristol
  • 9. Population Health Science Institute, University of Bristol
  • 10. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol
  • 11. Head of Research Grants and Deputy Director of the Research Office, University of Hertfordshire
  • 12. International Research Development Manager, University of Reading
  • 13. University of Oxford
  • 14. Queen's University Belfast
  • 15. University of Glasgow
  • 16. Senior Lecturer, Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol
  • 17. School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol
  • 18. NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre
  • 19. Swansea University
  • 20. Newcastle University

Description

This version of the report has been replaced by an updated version with additions to the author and contributor list. You can access the updated version at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10210812

This paper sets out the recommendations that have emerged from a six-month-long exploration and discussion of the processes that take place before research is submitted for funding: the 'pre-award' environment. Our work concentrated on how this environment is experienced by researchers at all career stages and from a variety of backgrounds, demographics, and disciplines, as well as by research managers and research support professionals. In the later stages of our exploration, representatives from research funders were also involved in the discussions.

The primary component of this project was an analysis of pre-award activities and processes at UK universities, using information collated from workshops with researchers and research management and support staff. The findings of this analysis were presented as a workflow diagram, which was then used to surface issues relating to equality, diversity, inclusion, and transparency in context. The workflow diagram and the issues highlighted by it were used to structure discussions at a symposium for a range of research stakeholders, held in Bristol, UK, in January 2023. The recommendations set out in this paper are drawn from discussions that took place at that event.

This paper is not an exhaustive landscape analysis, nor a review of existing research and practice in the area of pre-award processes or of recent thinking on the topics of equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI). Instead, it aims to summarise and encapsulate the suggestions put forward by the stakeholders during the symposium. These recommendations, from experienced professionals working in the field, are based on their encounters with the issues raised in the project. They do not solely relate to those working on pre-award processes, but may also apply to funders, policymakers, university leaders, and professional associations, since many of the challenges flagged in our research are systemic and cultural, and reach far beyond the research office.

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Additional details

Related works

Has part
Workflow: 10.5281/zenodo.8186347 (DOI)
Is previous version of
Report: 10.5281/zenodo.10210812 (DOI)

Funding

Institutional Strategic Support Fund 204813
Wellcome Trust