Published September 4, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Gender-Related Differences in Mechanics of the Sprint Start and Sprint Acceleration of Top National-Level Sprinters

  • 1. Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
  • 2. Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
  • 3. Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 4090541 Granada, Spain; Faculty of Education, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, 4030000 Concepción, Chile
  • 4. Faculty of Sport, Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 5. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, 6310 Izola, Slovenia; InnoRenew CoE, Livade 6, 6310 Izola, Slovenia; Andrej Marušič Institute, University of Primorska, 6000 Koper, Slovenia; S2P, Science to Practice, Ltd., Laboratory for Motor Control and Motor Behaviour, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Description

Background: Within the current study we aimed at exploring gender-related differences and the relationship between sprint start block kinematics and kinetics and sprint acceleration force–velocity (F-v) relationship parameters (maximal force [F0], maximal velocity [v0], maximal power [Pmax] and slope) in top national-level sprinters. (2) Methods: Twenty-eight sprinters (6 females) performed 10 maximal 30-m sprints. Start block and acceleration kinematics and kinetics were collected with an instrumented sprint start block and a laser distance sensor (KiSprint system). Displacement-time data were used to determine the F-v relationship through Samozino’s method. (3) Results: Start block rear foot maximal force (effect size [ES] = 1.08), rate of force development (ES = 0.90–1.33), F0 (ES = 1.38), v0 (ES = 1.83) and Pmax (ES = 1.95) were higher in males than in females (p ≤ 0.05). There were no differences in the slope, and ratio of horizontal-to-resultant force. F0, v0, and Pmax generally presented higher correlations with the start block kinetics (median r [range] = 0.49 [0.28, 0.78]) than with the kinematics (median r [range] = −0.27 [−0.52, 0.28]). (4) Conclusions: We confirmed that sprint block phase and sprint acceleration mechanics should be mutually assessed when analyzing sprinting performance. KiSprint system could provide more accurate information regarding mechanical pattern and technique during sprint initiation and acceleration, and potentially help create a more personalized and effective training program.

Files

ijerph-17-06447.pdf

Files (783.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:11ba4886f6a200fff5c9417e2840cd15
783.0 kB Preview Download