Published April 1, 2023
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
Ο ψυχολογικός πόλεμος της αισθητικής αρτιότητας μέσα από την έννοια της συναίνεσης, σε κειμενική αναπαράσταση του 19ου αιώνα
Description
Literature is often considered as a "place" of representing social and political elements and could stand as a powerful source of constantly rising conclusions about the way gender roles in it follow standardized semiotic patterns based on what is falsely considered as socially "objective" aesthetics. Some texts, through gender representations can offer a critical review and can form the basis of a gender-related interpretation able to reveal the unconscious world of prejudiced aesthetics. Hawthorne’s, The Birthmark is a “memorandum” of the social debt of literature and the politics of gender.
Notes
The psychological war of aesthetic excellence through the concept of consent, in a textual representation of the 19th century
Files
Kontopoulou 2023 Offprint.pdf
Files
(638.3 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:52da484c012c2184e75d7a7ab3e7ba1b
|
638.3 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- ARK
- ark:/13960/s22kr5vhf1q
References
- Crews, F. 1996. The Sins of the Father, New York: Oxford University Press
- Hawthorne, N. 2003. "The Birthmark), in The Norton Anthology of American Literature, edited, by Baym Nina, 1289 -1292, New York: Norton, 2003
- Hooks, B. 1984. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center, 2nd ed. Cambridge MA: South End Press Classics.
- Fetterley, J. 1978. The Resisting Reader: A Feminist Approach to American Fiction, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
- Millet, K. 1980. Sexual Politics, New York: Ballantine Books.
- Russ, J. 1995. What can a heroine do or why women can't write?, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
- Schweickart, P. 1989. Reading Ourselves: Toward a Feminist Theory of Reading, edited by Elian Showlter, London: Routledge
- Shakinovsky, L. 1995. "The Return of the Repressed: Illiteracy and the Death of the Narrative in Hawthorne's 'The Birthmark'", American Transcendental Quarterly 9(4): 269-281.