Published June 27, 2023 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Kampylasterinae Mah 2023

Description

The Kampylasterinae: A new subfamily within the Asterinidae

Kampylaster and Anseropoda were previously grouped together (see Spencer & Wright 1966) along with Mirastrella Fisher, 1940 within the Anseropodinae Fisher, 1906.Although a decisive placement was uncertain, A.M. Clark (1983) placed Mirastrella Fisher, 1940 with Leilaster A.H. Clark, 1938 in the Leilasteridae Jangoux & Aziz, 1988, separate from the Asterinidae. As discussed herein “ Anseropoda ” antarctica is separated from typological Anseropoda and thus, typological priority for the subfamily falls to the senior name, Kampylaster Koehler, 1920.

Based on both 2-gene and 3-gene trees, Kampylaster Koehler, 1920 and “ Anseropoda ” (now Astrotholus n. gen.) antarctica were supported as constituting a monophyletic clade within a larger Asterinidae + Ganeriidae cluster (Mah & Foltz 2011b). Although the Kampylaster + “ Anseropoda ” clade was well supported (100% bootstrap) its precise relationship to other taxa was more ambiguous and was supported as the sister taxon to different groups within the larger cluster. Complimentary to the molecular data, morphological characters shared between the two genera are readily identified, supporting a consistent subgrouping, the Kampylasterinae nov. subfam. within the Asterinidae. This subfamily is added to the three currently established groups within the Asterinidae, the Asterininae, Ganeriinae and Hyalinothricinae as defined by Mah & Fujita (2020).

Astrotholus and Kampylaster are similar in many respects, both lack superambulacral, transactinal, and superactinal plates, which are individually or partially present within most members of the Asterinidae (definition of terms follow O’Loughlin & Waters 2004).

Genera such as Stegnaster Sladen, 1889 have been argued as showing affinities with members of the Kampylasterinae. However, there has been contention concerning placement. Fisher (1911) placed Stegnaster within the Anseropodinae, which apparently met with disagreement by Spencer & Wright (1966) who placed Stegnaster closer to Tremaster in the “ Tremasterinae.” Although Stegnaster is not supported in the molecular phylogeny (Mah & Foltz 2011b) as an adjacent sister taxon to Kampylaster and “ Anseropoda ” antarctica it was supported as a member of a wider clade containing these taxa based on the 2-gene tree but was not included in their 3-gene tree. Close affinity of Stegnaster with the “ Kampylasterinae ” is plausible, although further work remains. Tremaster has historically also been shown to display morphological affinities, but is morphologically distinguished from Kampylaster and Astrotholus n. gen. based on the strongly developed imbricate surface plates, four series of tube feet, the presence of unusual internal chambers, and furrow spines in transverse series. The two-gene tree by Mah & Foltz (2011b) also showed Tremaster as being phylogenetically distant from the “ Kampylaster clade.”

Actinal intermediate plate patterns in Astrotholus n. gen. show similarity with the deep-water Paranepanthia platydisca (Fisher, 1913), the type species for Paranepanthia Fisher, 1917. in that two species of Astrotholus n. gen. both show transverse linear series which extend directly from the inferomarginal to the adambulacral plates. There is significant morphological disparity among Paranepanthia spp. and it is unclear if the deep-water species such as the typological P. platydisca forms a monophyletic group with shallow water forms such as Paranepanthia aucklandensis (Koehler, 1920).

Two-gene trees (Mah & Foltz 2011b, fig. 2) have shown the clade containing the Ganeriinae as sister to the Kampylasterinae. Cycethra, Perknaster and Cuenotaster, as members of the Ganeriinae show fenestrate (Cycethra and Cuenotaster) or greatly reduced skeletons (Perknaster) and demonstrate very different marginal and actinal plate patterns as well as body shape than what is observed in either Kampylaster or Astrotholus n. gen. Members of the Hyalothricinae all share fenestrate skeletons bearing paxillar or glassine spinelets which are absent in Kampylaster and Astrotholus. Mah & Fujita (2020) and Mah & Foltz (2011b) returned the Ganeriinae to the Asterinidae (following Sladen 1889) and moved the Hyalothricinae to the Asterinidae.

Key to genera of the Kampylasterinae

Granules only- with round surface, spinelets never present, forming continuous cover, obscuring plate boundaries. Furrow spines in transverse to oblique orientation relative to tube foot furrow. Actinolateral edge, thick to rounded............................................................................................... Kampylaster Fisher, 1940

Granules or spinelets, forming clusters conforming to underlying plates which range from flat to distinctly mound-like. Furrow spines parallel with tube foot furrow. Actinolateral edge angular................................. Astrotholus nov. gen.

Notes

Published as part of Mah, Christopher L., 2023, New Genera, Species, and observations on the biology of Antarctic Valvatida (Asteroidea), pp. 1-88 in Zootaxa 5310 (1) on pages 8-9, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5310.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/8090240

Files

Files (5.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4bc0064b86a1ac9b6e7300031d0c9e2d
5.8 kB Download

System files (35.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a6086d40e74110b834ba82085c8383f4
35.6 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Asterinidae
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Valvatida
Phylum
Echinodermata
Scientific name authorship
Mah
Taxonomic status
subfam. nov.
Taxon rank
subFamily
Taxonomic concept label
Kampylasterinae Mah, 2023 sec. Mah, 2023

References

  • Spencer, W. K. & Wright, C. W. (1966) Asterozoans, Part U: Echinodermata. In: Moore, R. C. (Ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology 3, 1. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas, pp. U 4 - U 107.
  • Fisher, W. K. (1940) Asteroidea. Discovery Reports, 20, 69 - 306.
  • Fisher, W. K. (1906) The starfishes of the Hawaiian islands. Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission, 23, 987 - 1130.
  • Clark, A. M. (1983) Notes on Atlantic Asteroidea. 3. Families Ganeriidae and Asterinidae. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History, Zoology, 30, 247 - 161. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. part. 28006
  • Clark, A. H. (1938) A new genus of starfishes from Puerto Rico. Smithsonian Miscellaneous collections, 91 (29), 1 - 7, 1 pl.
  • Jangoux, M. & Aziz, A. (1988) Les asterides (Echinodermata) recoltes autour de l'ile de la Reunion par le N. O.´Marion-Dufresne " en 1982. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Zoologie, 4 (10), 631 - 650. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / p. 287593
  • Koehler, R. (1920) Echinodermata: Asteroidea. Scientific Reports of the Australiasian Antarctic Expedition, C 8, 1 - 308. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 85380
  • Mah, C. L. & Foltz D. W. (2011 b) Molecular Phylogeny of the Valvatacea (Asteroidea, Echinodermata). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 161, 769 - 788. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1096 - 3642.2010.00659. x
  • Mah, C. & Fujita, T. (2020) New species and occurrence records of Japanese Solasteridae and Ganeriidae including a new species of Paralophaster from the North Pacific with an overview of Hyalinothrix. Zootaxa, 4750 (1), 67 - 100. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4750.1.4
  • O'Loughlin, P. M. & Waters, J. M. (2004) A molecular and morphological revision of genera of Asterinidae (Echinoderamta: Asteroidea). Memoirs of Museum Victoria, 61 (1), 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.24199 / j. mmv. 2004.61.1
  • Sladen, W. P. (1889) Asteroidea. Report of the Scientific Results of H. M. S. Challenger, 30, 1 - 893.
  • Fisher, W. K. (1911) Asteroidea of the North Pacific and adjacent waters. 1. Phanerozonia and Spinulosida. Bulletin of the US National Museum, 76 (xiii), 1 - 420. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 03629236.76. i
  • Fisher, W. K. (1913) New starfishes from the Philippine Islands, Celebes, and the Moluccas. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 46, 201 - 224. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 00963801.46 - 2022.201
  • Fisher, W. K. (1917) A new genus and subgenus of East-Indian sea stars. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 8, 20 (116), 172 - 173. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222931709486986