Revista Sociedade Científica
Published June 25, 2023 | Version v1
Journal article Open

LGPD, CIDADES INTELIGENTES E PRIVACIDADE

Creators

  • 1. Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brasil

Description

This paper discusses how and if the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) controls possible threats to personal privacy in smart cities and suggests further research on two possible solutions, focusing on holistic privacy impact assessment and code solutions to signal the need and consequences of giving consent for data collection in environmental environments. It follows the deductive method and uses bibliographic and monographic research tools as research tools.

Files

Art00083-2023.pdf

Files (263.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e5512a90577dd0891412fd91b004d25c
263.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • BRASIL. Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD). Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2018.
  • ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS (ONU). ONU prevê que cidades abriguem 70% da população mundial até 2050. ONU, Brasil, 19 fev. 2019. Disponível em: https://news.un.org/pt/story/2019/02/1660701. Acesso em: 25 out. 2021.
  • DAMERI, Renata Paola; COCCHIA, Annalisa. "Smart City and Digital City: Twenty Years of Terminology Evolution". In: CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN CHAPTER OF AIS, 10., 2013, Milan. Proceedings […]. Milan: Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.academia.edu/9937385/ITAIS_2013_Dameri_Cocchia. Acesso em: 28 out. 2021.
  • BRASIL. Câmara dos Deputados. Cidades inteligentes: uma abordagem humana e sustentável. 1. ed. Brasília, DF: Edições Câmara, 2021. p. 15, 21
  • EUROPEAN UNION. European Commission. Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM(2010) 2020 final. Brussels: EUR-Lex, 2020. Disponível em: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52010DC2020. Acesso em: 28 out. 2021.
  • ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014. Paris: OECD, 2014. Disponível em: http://www.oecd.org/sti/oecd-science-technology-and-industry-outlook-19991428.htm. Acesso em: 28 out. 2021.
  • ISO; IEC JTC. Smart Cities: Preliminary report 2014. Geneva: ISO, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.iso.org/iso/smart_cities_report-jtc1.pdf. Acesso em: 21 out. 2021.
  • KITCHIN, Rob. The Promises and Perils of Smart Cities. Smart Cities: special focus, England, p. 1, jul. 2015. Disponível em: http://www.scl.org/site.aspx?i=ed42789. Acesso em: 20 out. 2021.
  • BRASIL. Lei nº 11.079, de 30 de dezembro de 2004. Institui normas gerais para licitação e contratação de parceria público-privada no âmbito da administração pública. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2004.
  • HOJDA, Alexandre; MARTINS, Pedro; FARINIUKC, Tharsila Maynardes. Da cidade inteligente à inteligência nas operações urbanas: o caso do Centro de Operações Rio. Revista LIDER, Chile, v. 22, n. 36, p. 104-131, 2020.
  • RIBEIRO, Laura Talho. Olhares vivos em olhos de vidro: a vigilância por meio de câmeras de monitoramento no bairro de Botafogo. CSOnline – Revista Eletrônica de Ciências Sociais, Juiz de Fora, n. 25, p. 1-296, 2017.
  • BAECK, Peter; SAUNDERS, Tom. Rethinking Smart Cities From The Ground Up. Nesta, London, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/rethinking-smart-cities-ground#sthash.398wQeB1.dpuf. Acesso em: 21 out. 2021.
  • TOWNSEND, Anthony. Smart Cities: buggy and brittle. Places Journal, San Francisco, 2013. Disponível em: https://placesjournal.org/article/smart-cities/. Acesso em: 23 out. 2021
  • CERRUDO, Cesar. An Emerging US (and World) Threat: Cities Wide Open to Cyber Attacks. [S. l.]: IOActive, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.ioactive.com/pdfs/IOActive_HackingCitiesPaper_CesarCerrudo.pdf. Acesso em: 10 out. 2021.
  • FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (FTC). Internet of Things: Privacy and Security in a Connected World. USA: FTC, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-staff-report-november-2013-workshop-entitled-internet-things-privacy/150127iotrpt.pdf. Acesso em: 20 out. 2021.
  • GREENBERG, Andy. The Jeep Hackers Are Back to Prove Car Hacking Can Get Much Worse. Wired, United States, 01 ago. 2016. Disponível em: https://www.wired.com/2016/08/jeep-hackers-return-high-speed-steering-acceleration-hacks/. Acesso em: 25 out. 2021.
  • BROWN, Ian. GSR discussion paper. Regulation and the Internet of Things. Geneva: ITU, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Conferences/GSR/Documents/GSR2015/Discussion_papers_and_Presentations/GSR_DiscussionPaper_IoT.pdf. Acesso em: 20 out. 2021.
  • AKAMAI. State of the internet: report. Antel, Urugay, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.antel.com.uy/wps/wcm/connect/2e38bd0047ad6c9682d3e7af6890d810/q3-2014-state-of-the-internet-report+(2).pdf?MOD=AJPERES. Acesso em: 21 out. 2021.
  • MACSITHIGH, Daithi. Virtual walls? The law of pseudo-public spaces. International Journal of Law in Context, Cambridge, v. 8, n. 3, p. 394-412, 2012.
  • KOOPS, Bert-Jaap. On Legal Boundaries, Technologies, and Collapsing Dimensions of Privacy. Politica e Società, Italy, v. 3, n. 2, p. 247-264, 2014.
  • FINCH, Kelsey; TENE, Omar. Welcome to the Metropticon – Protecting Privacy in a Hyperconnected Town. Fordham Urban Law Journal, New York, v. 41, n. 5, p. 1581-1615, 2014.
  • ECHARRI, Miquel. 150 demissões em um segundo: os algoritmos que decidem quem deve ser mandado embora. El País, Barcelona, 10 out. 2021. Disponível em: https://brasil.elpais.com/tecnologia/2021-10-10/150-demissoes-em-um-segundo-assim-funcionam-os-algoritmos-que-decidem-quem-deve-ser-mandado-embora.html. Acesso em: 25 out. 2021.
  • WISMAN. Purpose and function creep by design: Transforming the face of surveillance through the Internet of Things. European Journal of Technology, Kenya, v. 4, n. 2, p. 1-19, 2013.
  • OHM, Paul. Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization. UCLA Law Review, California, p. 1701-1777, 2009.
  • CITRON, Danielle K.; PASQUALE, Frank. The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions Washington Law Review, Washington, v. 89, n. 1, p. 1-33, 2014.
  • MAYER-SCHONBERGER, Viktor; CUKIER, Kenneth. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. London: John Murray, 2013.
  • FUSTER, Gloria González; CHERRER, Amandine. Big Data and smart devices and their impact on privacy. Brussels: Europen Parliament, AEPD, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/536455/IPOL_STU(2015)536455_EN.pdf. Acesso em: 28 out. 2021.
  • MUNDIE, Craig, Privacy Pragmatism: Focus on Data Use, Not Data Collection. Foreign Affairs, New York, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2014-02-12/privacy-pragmatism. Acesso em: 20 out. 2021.
  • GEORGE, Robert M. Date for the Public Good: Data for the Public Good: Challenges and Barriers in the Context of Cities. In: LANE, Julia et al. Privacy, Big Data and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
  • LUGER, Ewa et al. Playing the Legal Card: Using Ideation Cards to Raise Data Protection Issues within the Design Process. In: ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 33., 2015, Seoul. Proceedings […]. Seoul: ACM, 2015.
  • HILDEBRANDT, Mireille; KOOPS, Bert-Jaap. The Challenges of Ambient Law and Legal Protection in the Profiling Era. The Modern Law Review, New York, v. 73, n. 3, p. 428-460, 2010.
  • KOOPS, Bert-Jaap; LEENES, Ronald. Privacy Regulation Cannot Be Hardcoded. A Critical Comment on the 'Privacy by Design' Provision in Data-Protection Law. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, London, v. 28, n. 2, p. 159-171, 2014.