Published June 20, 2023 | Version revision
Dataset Open

Deconvolved STED nanoscopy images of the nuclear phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate and nuclear speckle marker SON together with deconvolved confocal images of DAPI stained nuclei in human formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded skin sections

  • 1. Department of Biology of the Cell Nucleus, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic
  • 2. Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
  • 3. Institute of Virology, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Fürst-Pückler-Str. 56, 50935 Cologne, Germany

Description

The collection and analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human skin sections was approved by the local ethics-committee at the Department of Pathology, University of Cologne, Germany. Written informed consentwas obtained from all patients in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. For biopsy materials from archival paraffin blocks of human skin, an informed consent was obtained from all the subjects and ethical approval obtained from the Ethics Committee at the University of Cologne. Surgically removed human FFPE skin biopsies were sectioned into 4 µm sections. Sections were dewaxed, and indirectly immunofluorescently labeled against nuclear phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (nPI(4,5)P2) using  5 µg/mL rabbit primary polyclonal antibody (Echelon Biosciences Inc. Z-A045, clone 2C11). The primary antibody against nPI(4,5)P2 was recognized by the goat secondary antibody conjugated with Abberrior Star 635P (Abberior 2-0002-007-5). Sections were indirectly immunofluorescently labeled against nuclear speckle marker SON using  1 µg/mL rabbit primary polyclonal antibody (Abcam ab121759). The primary antibody against SON was recognized by the goat secondary antibody conjugated with Abberrior Star 580 (Abberrior ST580-1002). Sections were co-stained by DAPI 1:1000 in PBS for 5 min.

Imaging of nPI(4,5)P2-635P channel was performed on Leica TCS SP8 STED 3x inverted DMi8 microscope with pulsed white light laser 470-640 nm 1.5 mW and 775 nm pulse STED laser >1.5 W controlled by Leica Application Suite X software and equipped with HC PL APO CS2 100x/1.40 OIL objective used with Leica Type F immersion oil n=1.518. Unidirectional xyz scanning speed was 400 Hz, line accumulation 8. Pixel size was 20 nm in X and Y. Channel settings: 7% 633 nm laser; 775 Notch filter; 50% 775 nm STED laser; 30% 3D STED; HyD 639-698 nm, photon-counting mode, gain 100, gating 0.3-10 ns. Imaging of SON-580 channel was performed on Leica TCS SP8 STED 3x inverted DMi8 microscope with pulsed white light laser 470-640 nm 1.5 mW and 775 nm pulse STED laser >1.5 W controlled by Leica Application Suite X software and equipped with HC PL APO CS2 100x/1.40 OIL objective used with Leica Type F immersion oil n=1.518. Unidirectional xyz scanning speed was 400 Hz, line accumulation 8. Pixel size was 20 nm in X and Y. Channel settings: 10% 585 nm laser; 775 Notch filter; 80% 775 nm STED laser, 30% 3D STED; Hybrid detector (HyD) 589-616 nm, photon-counting mode, gain 100, gating 0.4-10 ns.

Z-stacks of STED images were deconvolved using Huygens Professional 22.10 software (Scientific Imaging B.V.). Data sets were processed using Workflow Processor. The workflow consisted of selecting images, setting up the microscopy and deconvolution parameters and saving deconvolved images as 8-bit TIFF single files for individual channels (which were later used for the quantitative analyses; see below). Microscopy parameters were optimized and set as follows. Sampling intervals were ≤20 nm in X and Y and  ≤20 nm in Z. Numerical aperture was 1.4; refractive indexes of the lens immersion oil was 1.518 and of the embedding media 1.458; objective quality was good, coverslip position was 0 µm and imaging direction was downward. For nPI(4,5)P2-635P STED channel the backprojected pinhole was 216 nm; excitation (ex.) and emission (em.) wavelengths (λ) were 633 and 651 nm, resp., ex. fill factor 2. STED depletion mode was pulsed, saturation factor 25, STED λ = 775, STED immunity factor 10 and STED 3X was 30%. Classic MLE algorithm with stabilization of Z-slices was used and signal-to-noise ratio was 5.1. For SON-580 STED channel the backprojected pinhole was 195 nm; excitation (ex.) and emission (em.) wavelengths (λ) were 585 and 602 nm, resp., ex. fill factor 2. STED depletion mode was pulsed, saturation factor 20, STED λ = 775, STED immunity factor 10 and STED 3X was 30%. Classic MLE algorithm with stabilization of Z-slices was used and signal-to-noise ratio was 4.

Notes

Individual channels of the images were merged into 3-chennel images by Ondrej Sebesta, Vinicna Microscopy Core Facility (VMCF) Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czechia.

Files

121215_FFPE2_add-skin-warts_221215_FFPE2_skin_1_Hoe-510_SON-580_PI45P2-635P_12Z_STED_1c_9_cmle.tif

Files (731.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d964358b13ccec12bdca17bc06431c2a
10.4 MB Preview Download
md5:0301ec509d9afd7c4d88df1a1982a88a
19.0 MB Preview Download
md5:27b9c9358185c67dc7a0cc129d993166
24.2 MB Preview Download
md5:f092aed047321726cc7c062d4b183e14
38.4 MB Preview Download
md5:15e240e39469f90b317d646050f5d00c
38.4 MB Preview Download
md5:ea185ef142734f63818ec8dda8864d7b
42.3 MB Preview Download
md5:9219ec2f38b036d885422ba1a334dfe7
5.9 MB Preview Download
md5:f28bf6a528b0cc7b4bf926a7052f1262
40.3 MB Preview Download
md5:9a8f52992ea12936143e7cc9745994b0
22.7 MB Preview Download
md5:bcec3e95c26f1efcd6d30b6c239721a7
23.8 MB Preview Download
md5:99847b9a76c13b47539bee0cc2f2ea4b
16.5 MB Preview Download
md5:32b4b9dfb6e339f402f10fc2a8468014
16.5 MB Preview Download
md5:4b776dfb206d76e20ed6f2e9191a10d7
7.9 MB Preview Download
md5:d0bbaa5b03252ec019a0018957e6e61f
14.2 MB Preview Download
md5:adae48c04ce1be3cf921d25ba4f89d75
14.2 MB Preview Download
md5:a6f0a82c26bbbd00f27b82dbccb30f17
26.9 MB Preview Download
md5:9e3dc3f3636386a0d2b6b1c20fdcefbd
19.0 MB Preview Download
md5:d7b4bfb463068171634166bc93168d0d
27.0 MB Preview Download
md5:c3620ff0d1c2301a9c15ffc2cc1c2b0f
28.1 MB Preview Download
md5:43e8ccfcba29f3e0f6bb0dc419f538d2
30.3 MB Preview Download
md5:12f31f8fbb3c75508b74e1d16f52357e
13.8 MB Preview Download
md5:342f675741951adb405fb458702789d4
19.5 MB Preview Download
md5:f05f206b691dbe835b8efe149043f1df
20.7 MB Preview Download
md5:7c14d1397df1488faba7baf6dd5dfc5f
22.4 MB Preview Download
md5:983bdb3d8cd3833291d9ebe65deb473f
12.6 MB Preview Download
md5:3de52905cf03f53f9a846a42d06156c1
12.6 MB Preview Download
md5:d416eecbbb087ae3161428ac4edfa82d
14.2 MB Preview Download
md5:f859adb83554ba0018bb142b75918846
25.2 MB Preview Download
md5:67339a571501fe0e2e23687388cc68d6
26.8 MB Preview Download
md5:d8c8d807cd25b3f2b6b25ff959ea7cf2
62.9 MB Preview Download
md5:53f1c5c17a70b1db81a3f25d0620d109
15.7 MB Preview Download
md5:b8ef1cda940352f0d9a02d444bb79357
18.9 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is published in
Journal article: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1217637 (DOI)