Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published May 30, 2023 | Version CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Journal article Open

The Effect of Incidental Learning and Deliberate Learning on L2 Repertoire

  • 1. MA Student, MA in Applied Linguistics, Sham University, Syria.

Description

Abstract: Vocabulary learning is a crucial aspect of language acquisition, and it can occur incidentally or deliberately. Incidental learning (also known as unintentional learning) indicates learning new words while reading or listening to spoken language. Deliberate learning, on the other hand, involves the intentional effort to learn new words through activities such as studying vocabulary lists, using flashcards, practicing with vocabulary exercises, or using a dictionary Both incidental and deliberate vocabulary learning have their advantages and disadvantages. Incidental learning is more natural and occurs in a context, which makes it more likely that new words will be remembered and used correctly. However, it can also be unpredictable and unreliable, as learners may not encounter the same vocabulary frequently enough to remember it. Deliberate learning, on the other hand, is more systematic and provides learners with more control over their learning. However, it can be less engaging and may not always lead to the same depth of understanding as incidental learning. 80 secondary school students were randomly selected to take part in the study, and they were assigned to one of three groups: an experimental group that received instructions on deliberate vocabulary learning techniques, an experimental group that received instructions on incidental vocabulary learning techniques, and a control group that received no instructions. For two weeks, the experimental groups received six hours of instruction in their chosen vocabulary learning strategies. Students in the deliberate vocabulary learning group learned how to learn new words by using techniques like flashcards, making mnemonic devices, and practicing with vocabulary drills. The students in the incidental vocabulary learning group were instructed to use guessing strategies to determine the meaning of new words while reading or listening. All participants took a vocabulary test following the instruction period, which evaluated their retention of the definitions of the words they had learned. The outcomes revealed that both experimental groups outperformed the control group by a significant margin, demonstrating the efficacy of both deliberate and accidental vocabulary learning techniques for enhancing vocabulary acquisition. The deliberate and incidental vocabulary learning groups performed similarly, which is interesting because it suggests that both methods are equally effective. To investigate the long-term effects of deliberate and accidental vocabulary learning techniques, additional research is required. It is crucial to keep in mind that this study concentrated on short-term vocabulary acquisition. The results of this study demonstrate that both deliberate and accidental vocabulary learning strategies can enhance secondary school students' vocabulary acquisition. Both educators and students can combine the two approaches to develop a robust vocabulary in a foreign language.

Notes

Published By: Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP) © Copyright: All rights reserved.

Files

I1606059923.pdf

Files (436.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:273ad3e19039218a6e25713f1cb6bee5
436.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
Journal article: 2394-0913 (ISSN)

References

  • P. Lightbown, and N. Spada, How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1999).
  • R. Mitchell, F. Myles, and E. Marsden, Second language learning theories. London: Hodder Arnold (2013).
  • F. O'Dell, Incorporating vocabulary into the syllabus. In Schmitt, N. and McCarthy, M. (eds) Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1997).
  • I. S. P. Nation, Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press (2013).
  • S. Fish, Is there a text in this class? – The authority of interpretative communities (2003) 12.
  • J. Richards, and T. S. Rodgers, Approaches and methods in language teaching. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2003).
  • W. M. Rivers, Teaching foreign language skills. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (1981).
  • N. Schmitt, Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2002).
  • M. Celce-Murcia, Teaching English as a second or foreign language. USA: Heinle and Heinle (2001).
  • C. Keck, and Y. Kim, Pedagogical grammar (2014).
  • S. J. Savignon, Communicative Competence: An Experiment in Foreign- Language Teaching. Philadelphia. Philadelphia: The Centre for Curriculum Development, Inc (1972).
  • T. Pica, Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, (1994). 493–527.
  • M. Swain, Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University (1995).
  • N. Schmitt, Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research 12 (2008) 329–363.
  • J. Richards, and R. Schmidt, Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (2002).
  • J. Coady, Research on ESL/EFL vocabulary acquisition: Putting it in context. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds). Second language reading and vocabulary learning (2001) 3-23.
  • R. Schmidt, The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2) (1990) 129-158.
  • N. C. Ellis, Frequency effects in language processing: a review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 (2002) 143-88.
  • M. Sharwood Smith, Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15 (1993) 165-179.
  • S. Krashen, Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon (1982).
  • S. Ahmed, Intentional learning vs incidental learning. Journal of Psychology and Clinical Psychiatry 7(2) (2017) 00426. DOI: 10.15406/jpcpy.2017.07.00426
  • J. Ahmad, Intentional vs. incidental vocabulary learning. ELT Research Journal (2012). Retrieved August 19, 2021, from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/63597.
  • J. Barcroft, Effects of synonym generation on incidental and intentional L2 vocabulary learning during reading. TESOL Quarterly, 43(1) (2009) 79-103.
  • D. Zhang, and J. G. Wu, Learning Across Contexts: A Multiple Case Study of Mobile Dictionary in Chinese EFL learners' Incidental and Intentional Vocabulary Learning (2019).
  • Ç. Mart, Guessing the meanings of words from context: Why and how. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(6) (2012) 177-181.
  • J. H. Hulstijn, M. Hollander, and T. Greidanus, Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3) (1996) 327–339.
  • H. Hamilton, The efficacy of dictionary use while reading for learning new words. American Annals of the Deaf, 157(4) (2012) 358–372.
  • L. C. Seibert, A study on the practice of guessing word meanings from a context. The Modern Language Journal, 29(4) (1945) 296–322.
  • N. Schmitt, and M. P. H. Rodgers, An introduction to applied linguistics (2020).
  • M. H. Long, The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W.C., & Bhatia, T.K. (eds) Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press, (1996) 413-68
  • G. Bing-jie, Is recast the most effective type of corrective feedback? Under cognitive and sociolinguistic approach. Sino-US English Teaching 13(4) (2016) 284-291.
  • C. F. HU, Fast-Mapping and deliberate word-learning by EFL children. The Modern Language Journal, 96(3) (2012) 439–453.
  • S. Krashen, The input hypothesis: issues and implications. Harlow: Longman (1985).

Subjects

ISSN: 2394-0913 (Online)
https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2394-0913#
Retrieval Number: 100.1/ijmh.I1606059923
https://www.ijmh.org/portfolio-item/i1606059923/
Journal Website: www.ijmh.org
https://www.ijmh.org
Publisher: Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP)
https://www.blueeyesintelligence.org