UArctic
Published August 10, 2023 | Version v1
Report Open

Arctic Research Trends: Bibliometrics 2016-2022

Creators

  • 1. Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research & Education (NIFU), Norway
  • 2. Integrated Science Lab, Department of Physics, Umeå University, Sweden
  • 3. Department of Sociology, Inforsk & University Library, Umeå University, Sweden
  • 4. Arctic Centre, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Sweden

Contributors

Other:

  • 1. Department of Sociology, Inforsk, Umeå University, Sweden
  • 2. UArctic
  • 3. Arctic Centre and Climate Impacts Research Centre at Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Umeå University, Sweden

Description

This work was conducted by the UArctic Thematic Network on Research Analytics and Bibliometrics. It was supported by Global Affairs Canada through the Global Arctic Leadership Initiative.

Notes

Supported by Global Affairs Canada through the Global Arctic Leadership Initiative.

Files

Arctic Research Trends Bibliometrics 2016 - 2022_nmb_AC korr.pdf

Files (4.7 MB)

Additional details

Identifiers

ISBN
978-91-8070-108-2

References

  • Aksnes, D. W. & D. O. Hessen (2009). The structure and development of polar research (1981-2007): A publication–based approach. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research. 41(2), 155-163.
  • Aksnes, D. W., Schneider J. W. & Gunnarsson, M. (2012): Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 36-43.
  • Aksnes, D. W., Osipov, I., Moskaleva, O., & Kullerud, L. (2016). Arctic Research Publication Trends: A Pilot Study. Elsevier. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/204353/Arctic-Research-Publication-Trends-August-2016.pdf
  • Augustsson, A., Aldberg, H. & Friberg, M (2014). Bibliometric survey of polar research in Sweden. Swedish Research Council
  • Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. 1(1), 377-386. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00019, 150-170. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00013 %J Quantitative Science Studies
  • Colledge, L. & and Verlinde, R. (2014). SciVal Metrics Guidebook. Elsevier Research Intelligence. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/53327/scival-metrics-guidebook-v1_01-february2014.pdf
  • Côté, G. & M. Picard-Atiken (2009). Arctic research in Canada. A bibliometric study. Science-Metrix. Montreal.
  • Cruikshank, J. (1992). Invention of Anthropology in British Columbia's Supreme Court: Oral Tradition as Evidence in the Case of Delgamuukw v. A.G. BC Studies, 95:25-42.
  • Dastidar, P.G. (2007). National and institutional productivity and collaboration in Antarctic science: an analysis of 25 years of journal publications (1980-2004). Polar Research. 26, 175-180.
  • Donner, P., Rimmert, C., & van Eck, N. J. (2020). Comparing institutional-level bibliometric research performance indicator values based on different affiliation disambiguation systems. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 150-170. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00013 %J Quantitative Science Studies
  • Gauffriau, M. (2021). Counting methods introduced into the bibliometric research literature 1970-2018: A review. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(3), 932-975. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00141
  • Ingold, T. (1992). Culture and the perception of the environment, in Croll, E. and Parkin D. (eds.) Bush Base, Forest Farm: culture, environment, and development. London: Routledge.
  • Luukkonen, T., O. Persson & G. Sivertsen (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values. 17(1), 101-126.
  • Melin, G & O. Persson 1996. Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics. 36 (3), 363-377.
  • Mousalemas, S.A. (Ed.), (1997). Arctic Ecology and Identity. Budapest & Los Angeles: Hungarian Academy of Sciences and ISTOR.
  • Nazarovets, M. & da Silva, J.A.T. 2022). Scientific publishing sanctions in response to the Russo-Ukrainian war. Learned Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1487
  • Noack, A. (2009). Modularity clustering is force-directed layout. Physical Review E, 79(2), 026102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.79.026102
  • Osipov, I.A., Radford, G., Aksnes, D.W., Kullerud, L. & Hirshberg, D. & (2017). International Arctic Research: Analyzing Global Funding Trends (2017 update). Digital Science Reports. https://www.uarctic.org/media/1598052/digital_science_report_international_arctic_funding2017.pdf
  • Pan, L. (2014). Research Output, Growth and Impact of Saint-Petersburg State Polytechnical University.
  • Rousseau, R. (2021). Going Back in Time: Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration. Journal of Scientometric Research. 20, 1, 126-129.
  • Scopus (2023). What is the complete list of Scopus subject areas and all science journal classification codes (ASJC)? https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/15181/supporthub/scopus/~/what-is-the-complete-list-of-scopus-subject-areas-and-all-science-journal/. Accessed 10 May 2023.
  • Steijn, M. P. A. (2021). Improvement on the association strength: Implementing a probabilistic measure based on combinations without repetition. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(2), 778-794. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00122
  • van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter, 7.