Published April 26, 2023 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Molecular epidemiology and risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in long-term care residents

  • 1. Kantonsspital St. Gallen
  • 2. Unité cantonale hygiène, prévention et contrôle de l'infection, Canton of Vaud*
  • 3. Centre for Laboratory Medicine, St. Gallen*
  • 4. University Hospital of Basel
  • 5. Federal Office of Public Health
  • 6. Geneva University Hospitals*
  • 7. Geriatric clinic St. Gallen*

Description

Objectives: We aimed to assess the burden of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales in Swiss long-term care facilities (LTCFs) to describe the molecular epidemiology, describe the intra-institutional and regional clusters of resistant pathogens, and identify independent institution- and resident-level factors associated with colonization.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting and participants: From August to October 2019, we performed a point prevalence study among residents from 16 LTCFs in Western and Eastern Switzerland (8 per region).

Methods: Residents underwent screening for ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E); whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed. We gathered institution-level (eg, number of beds, staff-resident ratio, alcoholic hand rub consumption) and resident-level [eg, anthropometric data, time in facility, dependency, health care exposure, antibiotic treatment, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use] characteristics. Factors associated with colonization were identified using a generalized linear model.

Results: Among 1185 eligible residents, 606 (51%) consented to the study. ESBL-E prevalence was 11.6% (70/606), ranging from 1.9% to 33.3% between institutions, with a median of 12.5% in the West and 6.9% in the East (P = .03). Among 59 Escherichia coli (from 58 residents), multilocus sequence type (ST) 131 was most common (n = 43/59, 73%), predominantly its subclone H30R1 (n = 37/43, 86%). WGS data identified multiple intra-institutional and regional clusters. Independent risk factors for ESBL carriage were previous ESBL colonization [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 23.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.6–83.8, P < .001), male gender (aOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5–4.6, P = .002), and use of PPIs (aOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2–3.8, P = .01).

Conclusions and implications: Overall ESBL-E prevalence in Swiss LTCF residents is low. Yet, we identified several clusters of residents with identical pathogens within the same institution. This implies that particularly affected institutions might benefit from targeted infection control interventions. PPI use was the only modifiable factor associated with carriage of ESBL producers. This study adds to the growing list of adverse outcomes associated with PPIs, calling for action to restrict their use in the long-term care setting.

Notes

Microsoft Office programs

Funding provided by: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711
Award Number: PZ00P3_179919

Funding provided by: Bundesamt für Gesundheit
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002329
Award Number: 18.011615

Files

LongTermCare_dryad.csv

Files (244.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6fb8e69774a80f1061dfbe4655e52670
242.2 kB Preview Download
md5:3ecb53cbe0212b95fd9dda24897709c3
2.4 kB Preview Download

Additional details