Published April 20, 2023
| Version v3
Other
Open
ESM2025 Research Highlight - Exploring methane emissions and mitigation strategies through Earth System Models
Creators
- 1. ESM2025/Météo-France
- 2. MetOffice Hadley Centre
Description
A research highlight about the new generation of fully-coupled methane emission-driven Earth system models.
Files
RH_methane_Lowres.pdf
Files
(1.0 MB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:464b4cafdc0059bda414382613aa6214
|
1.0 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Cites
- Journal article: 10.1029/2021MS002982 (DOI)
References
- Climate and Clean Air Coalition. (2021). Global Methane Pledge. https://www.methanepledge.org/
- Forster, P., T. Storelvmo, K. Armour, W. Collins, J.-L. Dufresne, D. Frame, D.J. Lunt, T. Mauritsen, M.D. Palmer, M. Watanabe, M. Wild, and H. Zhang, 2021: The Earth's Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 923–1054, doi: 10.1017/9781009157896.009
- United Nations Environment Programme & Climate and Clean Air Coalition (2021) Global Methane Assessment: Benefits and Costs of Mitigating Methane Emissions. Nairobi, United Nations Environment Programme
- Folberth, G. A., Staniaszek, Z., Archibald, A. T., Gedney, N., Griffiths, P. T., Jones, C. D., et al. (2022). Description and evaluation of an emission-driven and fully coupled methane cycle in UKESM1. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 14, e2021MS002982. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002982
- Lan, X., et al. (2023) Trends in globally-averaged CH4, N2O, and SF6 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements. Version 2023-03, doi:10.15138/P8XG-AA10
- O'Connor, F. M., et al. (2010), Possible role of wetlands, permafrost, and methane hydrates in the methane cycle under future climate change: A review, Rev. Geophys., 48, RG4005, doi:10.1029/2010RG000326
- Thornhill, G., Collins, W., Olivié, D., Skeie, R. B., Archibald, A., Bauer, S., Checa-Garcia, R., Fiedler, S., Folberth, G., Gjermundsen, A., Horowitz, L., Lamarque, J.-F., Michou, M., Mulcahy, J., Nabat, P., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Paulot, F., Schulz, M., Scott, C. E., Séférian, R., Smith, C., Takemura, T., Tilmes, S., Tsigaridis, K., and Weber, J.: Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1105–1126, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1105-2021, 2021
- Dean, J. F., Middelburg, J. J., Röckmann, T., Aerts, R., Blauw, L. G., Egger, M., et al. (2018). Methane feedbacks to the global climate system in a warmer world. Reviews of Geophysics, 56, 207– 250. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000559
- Staniaszek, Z., Griffiths, P.T., Folberth, G.A. et al. The role of future anthropogenic methane emissions in air quality and climate. npj Clim Atmos Sci 5, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-022-00247-5
- Saunois et al. The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1561–1623, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020, 2020
- Abernethy S., O'Connor F. M., Jones C. D. and Jackson R. B. (2021) Methane removal and the proportional reductions in surface temperature and ozonePhil. Trans. R. Soc. A.3792021010420210104. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0104
- Kleinen, T., Mikolajewicz, U., and Brovkin, V.: Terrestrial methane emissions from the Last Glacial Maximum to the preindustrial period, Clim. Past, 16, 575–595, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-575-2020, 2020
- Kleinen, T., Gromov, S., Steil, B. and Brovkin, V. (2021) Atmospheric methane underestimated in future climate projections. Environ. Res. Lett. 16 094006. DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac1814