Ethical Frameworks for Disclosure of Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers to Research Participants: Conflicting Norms and a Nuanced Policy
Creators
- 1. Associate professor at the Erasmus University Medical Center in the Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine
- 2. Scientific secretary for the subcommittee on ethics and societal aspects at the Netherlands Commission on Genetic Modification
- 3. Sociologist of science, technology, and medicine, the head of research and dialogue at Wellcome Connecting Science, and the deputy director of the Kavli Centre for Ethics, Science, and the Public at the University of Cambridge
- 4. Alzheimer Europe
- 5. Professor of neurology at Amsterdam University Medical Centre and a neurologist at the Department of Neurology at the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour at Radboud University Medical Centre
- 6. Professor of philosophy of medicine at the Erasmus University Medical Center in the Department of Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine
Description
Abstract:
More and more frequently, clinical trials for Alzheimer disease (AD) are targeting cognitively unimpaired individuals who are at increased risk of developing the disease. It is not always clear whether AD biomarker information should be disclosed to research participants: on the one hand, research participants may be interested in learning this information because of its perceived utility, but on the other hand, learning this information may be harmful, as there are very few effective preventive or therapeutic options available for AD. In this article, we bring together three separate sets of ethical guidance literature: on the return of individual research results, on an individual's right to access personal data, and on transparent enrollment into clinical trials. Based on these literatures, we suggest policies for the disclosure of AD biomarker test results in longitudinal observational cohort studies, clinical trials, and hybrid research projects, such as the European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia (EPAD) project, in which we served as an ethics team. We also present and critically discuss recommendations for disclosure of AD biomarkers in practice. We underscore that, as long as the clinical validity of AD biomarkers remains limited, there are good reasons to avoid actively disclosing them to cognitively unimpaired research participants.
Notes
Files
Ethics Human Research - 2022 - Bunnik - Ethical Frameworks for Disclosure of Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers to Research.pdf
Files
(872.9 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:7d8a3de3937b38a9a96a5e251b1c8233
|
872.9 kB | Preview Download |