Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published November 25, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

A morphometric comparison of two sympatric Campylopus Brid. (Leucobryaceae, Bryophyta) species

Creators

  • 1. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Sistemática Vegetal, Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, 31270-901 (Brazil) adaisesmaciel@ufmg.br (corresponding author)

Description

T, Cíntia Aparecida, Araújo, eixeira, Peñaloza-Bojacá, Gabriel Felipe, De, Bárbara Azevedo, Oliveira, Maciel-Silva, Adaíses S. (2020): A morphometric comparison of two sympatric Campylopus Brid. (Leucobryaceae, Bryophyta) species. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 20 (19): 239-253, DOI: 10.5252/cryptogamie-bryologie2020v41a19, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4878.3.2

Files

source.pdf

Files (4.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:620859fa9f109237b175645ca75f4a18
4.5 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Cites
Publication: 10.1179/174328205X69959 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3732/ajb.93.9.1313 (DOI)
Publication: 10.2307/2656595 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1590/S2175-78602013000300005 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1590/2236-8906-91/2015 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1590/2175-7860201566409 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04361.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1179/jbr.1987.14.4.701 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.flora.2010.04.020 (DOI)
Publication: 10.7872/cryb/v37.iss3.2016.241 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1002/ece3.3301 (DOI)
Publication: 10.2307/3242275 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01408.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1093/aob/mcr027 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10531-007-9156-8 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1179/jbr.1979.10.3.321 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1590/0102-33062014abb0034 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1179/jbr.1992.17.2.203 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.flora.2017.06.012 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.flora.2017.02.017 (DOI)
Publication: 10.7872/cryb.v35.iss2.2014.133 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1639/0007-2745-113.4.788 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1639/0007-2745(2005)108[0183:SEPSAS]2.0.CO;2 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1600/0363644042450946 (DOI)
Publication: 10.2307/25065366 (DOI)
Has part
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.10600438 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/9E3187829F189239B25862EEA6DE4D34 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.7822234 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/9E3187829F1E9238B1F1630EA50F4888 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7822232 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/42E7661C9F169231B1946480A20A4AF6 (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/42E7661C9F169231B1F16149A64C4F26 (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/42E7661C9F179230B35D6486A3474AF4 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7822236 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7822238 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7822240 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7822242 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7822244 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7822246 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/42E7661C9F1D923AB1F16742A512495F (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7822248 (DOI)
Is source of
Dataset: https://www.gbif.org/dataset/65fe4784-fbba-4517-919f-39e00c976e98 (URL)

References

  • BAUGHMAN J. T., PAYTON A. C., PAASCH A. E., FISHER K. M. & MCDANIEL S. F. 2017. - Multiple factors influence population sex ratios in the Mojave Desert moss Syntrichia caninervis. American
  • BISANG I. & HEDENAS L. 2005. - Sex ratio patterns in dioicous bryophytes re-visited. Journal of Bryology 27: 207-219. https:// doi.org/10.1179/174328205X69959
  • BISANG I., EHRLEN J. & HEDENAS L. 2006. - Reproductive effort and costs of reproduction do not explain female-biased sex rations in the moss Pseudocalliergon trifarium (Amblystegiaceae).American Journal of Botany 93: 1313-1319. https://doi.org/10.3732/ ajb.93.9.1313
  • BOWKER M. A., STARK L. R., MCLETCHIE D. N. & MISHLER B. D. 2000. - Sex expression, skewed sex ratios, and microhabitat distribution in the dioicous desert moss Syntrichia caninervis (Pottiaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 517-526. https:// doi.org/10.2307/2656595
  • CARMO F. F. & JACOBI C. M. 2012. - As Cangas do Quadrilatero Ferrifero, in JACOBI C. M. & CARMO F.F. (eds),Diversidade floristica nas cangas do Quadrilatero Ferrifero. IDM, Belo Horizonte: 1-13.
  • CARMO F. F. & JACOBI C. M. 2013. - A vegetacao de Canga no Quadrilatero Ferrifero, Minas Gerais: caracterizacao e contexto fitogeografico. Rodriguesia 64: 527-541.https://doi.org/10.1590/ S2175-78602013000300005
  • CARMO F. F. & KAMINO L. H. Y. 2015. - Geossistemas ferruginosos do Brasil: areas prioritarias para conservacao da diversidade geologica e biologica, patrimonio cultural e servicos ambientais. 3i Editora, Belo Horizonte, 552 p.
  • CARMO D. M., LIMA J. S., AMELIO L. A. & PERALTA D. F. 2016. - Bryophytes in Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar, Nucleo Santa Virginia, Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Hoehnea 43: 265-287. https:// doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-91/2015
  • COSTA D. P. & PERALTA D. F. 2015. - Bryophytes diversity in Brazil.Rodriguesia 66: 1063-1071.https://doi.org/10.1590/2175- 7860201566409
  • CRONBERG N., RYDGREN K. & OKLAND R. N. 2006. - Clonal structure and genet-level sex ratios suggest different roles of vegetative and sexual reproduction in the clonal moss Hylocomium splendens. Ecography 29: 95-103.https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.2006.0906-7590.04361.x
  • EEN G. 1989. - Mosses from the Mascarenes. Tropical Bryology 1: 55-62.
  • FANTECELLE L. B., PENALOZA- BOJACA G. F., OLIVEIRA B. A., ARAUJO C. A. T. & MACIEL- SILVA A.S. 2017. - Briofitas da Chapada de Canga: diversidade e importancia, in KAMINO L. H. Y. & CARMO F. F. (eds), Chapada de Canga: patrimonio natural e cultural de relevante interesse para a conservacao. 3i Editora, Belo Horizonte: 169-195.
  • FRAHM J. P. 1987. - A survey of the Campylopus species of Australia.Journal of Bryology 14 (4): 701-727.https://doi.org/10.1179/ jbr.1987.14.4.701
  • FRAHM J. P. 1990. - Campylopus, a modern and successful genus!? Tropical Bryology 2: 91-101.
  • FRAHM J. P. 1991. - Dicranaceae, Campylopodioideae, Paraleucobryoideae. Flora Neotropica. 54: 1-237.
  • FRAHM J. P. 1992. - A revision of the East-Asia species of Campylopus. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 71: 133-164.
  • FRAHM J. P. 1999. - A type catalogue of Campylopodioideae and Paraleucobryoideae (Musci, Dicranaceae), Part II, Campylopus. Tropical Bryology 16: 17-102.
  • FRAHM J. P. & HEDDERSON T. 2004. - New and interesting Campylopus records from South Africa. Tropical Bryology 25: 111-115.
  • FRAHM J. P. & POREMBSKI S. 1994. - Moose von inselbergen aus Westafrika. Tropical Bryology 9: 59-68.
  • FRAHM J. P. & STECH M. 2006. - The taxonomic status of intermediate forms of Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. and C. pilifer Brid. (Dicranaceae, Bryopsida) newly discovered in Europe. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 27: 213-223.
  • FREY W. & KURSCHNER H. 2011. - Asexual reproduction, habitat colonization and habitat maintenance in bryophytes. Flora 206: 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2010.04.020
  • GAMA R., FARIA A. L. A., CAMARA P. E. A. S. & STECH M. 2016. - Identity and origin of the Campylopus (Leucobryaceae, Bryopsida) species from Trindade Island (Brazil). Cryptogamie, Bryologie 37: 241-250. https://doi.org/10.7872/cryb/v37.iss3.2016.241
  • GAMA R., AGUIRRE- GUTIERREZ J. & STECH M. 2017. - Ecological niche comparison and molecular phylogeny segregate the invasive moss species Campylopus introflexus (Leucobryaceae, Bryophyte) from its closest relatives. Ecology and Evolution 7: 8017-8031. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3301
  • GLIME J. M. & BISANG I. 2014. - Sexuality: sex ratio and sex expression. Bryophyte Ecology 1: 1-30.
  • GOFFINET B. & BUCK W. R. 2004. - Systematics of the Bryophyta (Mosses): from molecules to a revised classification. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 98: 205-239.
  • GOFFINET B., BUCK W. R. & SHAW A. J. 2008. - Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta,in GOFFINET B. & SHAW A. J. (eds), Bryophyte Biology. Cambridge University Press, New York: 55-138.
  • GRADSTEIN S. R., CHURCHILL S. P. & SALAZAR- ALLEN N. 2001. - Guide to the bryophytes of tropical America.Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 86: 1-557.
  • GRADSTEIN S. R. & SIPMAN H. J. M. 1978. - Taxonomy and World Distribution of Campylopus introflexus and C. pilifer (= C. polytrichoides) a New Syntesis. The Bryologist 81: 114-121. https://doi.org/10.2307/3242275
  • HEDENAS L., BISANG I., KOPELAINEN H. & CRONHOLM B. 2010. - The true sex ratio in European Pseudocalliergon trifarium (Bryophyta: Amblystegiaceae) revealed by a novel molecular approach. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 100: 132-140. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01408.x
  • HORSLEY K., STARK L. R. & MCLETCHIE D. N. 2011. - Does the silver moss Bryum argenteum exhibit sex-specific patterns in vegetative growth rate, asexual fitness or prezygotic reproductive investment? Annals of Botany 107: 897-907. https://doi. org/10.1093/aob/mcr027
  • JACOBI C. M., CARMO F. F., VICENT R. C. & STEHMANN J. R. 2007. - Plant communities on ironstone outcrops: a diverse and endangered Brazilian ecosystem.Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 2185-2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9156-8
  • JOHANSEN D. A. 1940. - Plant microtechnique. MacGraw Hill Book, New York, 523 p.
  • KARNOVSKY M. J. 1965. - A formaldehyde - glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. Journal of Cellular Biology 27: 27-137.
  • KORPELAINEN H. 1998. - Labile sex expression in plants. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 73: 157-180.
  • LONGTON R. E. 2006. - Reproductive ecology of bryophytes: what does it tell us about the significance of sexual reproduction? Lindbergia 31: 16-23.
  • LONGTON R. E. & GREENE S. W. 1979. - Experimental studies of growth and reproduction in the moss Pleurozium schreberi (Brid.) Mitt. Journal of Bryology 10: 321-338. https://doi.org/10.1179/ jbr.1979.10.3.321
  • LONGTON R. E. & SCHUSTER R. M. 1983. - Reproduction biology, in LONGTON R. E. (ed.), New Manual of Bryology. Hattori Botany Laboratory, Nichinan: 386-462.
  • MACIEL- SILVA A. S. & PORTO K. C. 2014. - Reproduction in Bryophytes, in RAMAWAT K. G., MERILLON J. M. & SHIVANNA K. R. (eds), Reproduction Biology of Plants. CRC Press: 57-84.
  • MADEIRA J. A., MARTINS F. D., RIBEIRO K. T. & CARVALHO A. S. 2015. - Geossistemas Ferruginosos e areas protegidas, in CARMO F. F. & KAMINO L. H. Y. (eds), Geossistemas Ferruginosos do Brasil: areas prioritarias para conservacao da diversidade geologica e biologica, patrimonio cultural e servicos ambientais. 3i Editora, Belo Horizonte: 453-477.
  • MCCUNE B. & GRACE J. B. 2002. - Analysis of Ecological Communities. MJM Press, Oregon, Software design, 300 p.
  • MEDINA R. G., BARCELLOS S. A., VICTORIA F. C., ALBURQUERQUE M. P., PEREIRA A. B. & STEFENON V. M. 2015. - Evidence of morphometric differentiation among Antarctic moss populations as a response to local microenvironment. Acta Botanica Brasilica 29: 383-390.https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062014abb0034
  • MILES C. J. & LONGTON R. E. 1992. - Spore structure and reproductive biology in Archidium alternifolium (Dicks. ex Hedw.) Schimp.Journal of Bryology 17: 203-222.https://doi.org/10.1179/ jbr.1992.17.2.203
  • MORAES E. N. R. & LISBOA R. C. L. 2006. - Musgos (Bryophyta) da Serra de Carajas, Estado do Para, Brazil. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi Ciencias Naturais 1: 36-68.
  • NEHIRA K. 1983. - Spore germination, protonema development and sporeling development. New Manual of Bryology 1: 343-385.
  • PENALOZA- BOJACA G. F., OLIVEIRA B. A., ARAUJO C. A. T., FANTECELLE L. B., SANTOS N. D. & MACIEL- SILVA A. S. 2018a. - Bryophytes on Brazilian ironstone outcrops: diversity, environmental filtering, and conservation implications. Flora 238: 162-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2017.06.012
  • PENALOZA- BOJACA G. F., OLIVEIRA B. A., ARAUJO C. A. T., FANTECELLE L. B. & MACIEL- SILVA A. S. 2018b. - Bryophyte reproduction on ironstone outcrops: delicate plants in harsh environments. Flora 238: 155-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. flora.2017.02.017
  • RASBAND W. S. 1997-2012. - ImageJ, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Available from:http://imagej. nih.gov/ij/ (accessed: March 2018).
  • SANTOS M. B. 2011. - Contribuicao ao conhecimento do genero Campylopus Brid. (Bryophyte, Leucobryaceae) no Nordeste do Brasil.Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Brazil, 72 p.
  • SHARP A. J., CRUM H. & ECKEL P. M. 1994. - The moss flora of Mexico. Part one: Sphagnales to Bryales. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 69: 132-134.
  • SHERPHERD G. J. 2010. - Fitopac file Version 2.1.2.85. Universidade de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
  • SILVA J. B., SANTOS N. D. & PORTO K. C. 2014. - Beta-diversity: effect of geographical distance and environmental gradients on the rocky outcrop bryophytes. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 35: 133- 163. https://doi.org/10.7872/cryb.v35.iss2.2014.133
  • STARK L. R., MCLETCHIE D. N. & EPPLEY S. M. 2010. - Sex ratios and the shy male hypothesis in the moss Bryum argenteum (Bryaceae).The Bryologist 113: 788-797.https://doi.org/10.1639/0007- 2745-113.4.788
  • STARK L. R., MCLETCHIE D. N. & MISHLER B. D. 2005. - Sex expression, plant size, and spatial segregation of the sexes across a stress gradient in the desert moss Syntrichia caninervis. The Bryologist 108: 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007- 2745(2005)108[0183:SEPSAS]2.0.CO;2
  • STECH M. 2004. - Supraspecific circumscription and classification of Campylopus (Dicranaceae, Bryopsida) based on inferences from sequence data. Systematic Botany 29: 817-824. https://doi. org/10.1600/0363644042450946
  • STECH M. & WAGNER D. 2005. - Molecular relationship, biogeography and evolution of Gondwanan Campylopus species (Dicranaceae, Bryophida). Taxon 54:377-382. https://doi. org/10.2307/25065366