Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published November 16, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Oospore features among morphologically similar and closely related charophyte species: consistency and variability

Creators

  • 1. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden "Jevremovac", Takovska 43, 11000 Belgrade (Serbia) itrbojevic@bio.bg.ac.rs (corresponding author)

Description

Milovanović, Vanja, Popović, Slađana, Predojević, Dragana, Simić, Gordana Subakov, Ržaničanin, Ana, Sekulić, Jasmina Šinžar, Trbojević, Ivana (2022): Oospore features among morphologically similar and closely related charophyte species: consistency and variability. Cryptogamie, Algologie 20 (12): 189-200, DOI: 10.5252/cryptogamie-algologie2022v43a12, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/cryptogamie-algologie2022v43a12

Files

source.pdf

Files (3.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7097a2c3b8f91c1174213b58afb646a8
3.2 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FF97FFC3FFF91C1174213B58FFB6FFA8
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF97FFC3FFF91C1174213B58FFB6FFA8

Cites
Publication: 10.1061/40976(316)271 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00557.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00725.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/S0304-3770(01)00203-0 (DOI)
Publication: 10.2478/s11756-008-0079-y (DOI)
Publication: 10.2216/i0031-8884-36-4-274.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.18637/jss.v061.i06 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/00288250709509729 (DOI)
Publication: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v38i4.30802 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/BF00317293 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/09670269400650681 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.07.001 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/23818107.2017.1393460 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.05.003 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.11.006 (DOI)
Publication: 10.2298/ABS0404131M (DOI)
Publication: 10.1023/A:1017001703033 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s11355-006-0005-9 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/23818107.2017.1400464 (DOI)
Publication: 10.2216/i0031-8884-14-2-97.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.5586/asbp.2012.012 (DOI)
Publication: 10.5194/hess-17-325-2013 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/23818107.2019.1703808 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3390/plants9111606 (DOI)
Has part
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.7829462 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE87BBFFFF1C1774A538ADFCB3F8C4 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.7829464 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE87BBFFFF1C1774A53CCAFB30FB66 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.7829466 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE87BBFFFF1C17770C3FACFAE0F843 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.7829468 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE87BBFFFE1C1674A53F4DFE75F904 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.7829470 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE87BBFFFE1C1674A53D8AFCB1F844 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7819453 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7819455 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7819457 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF786625FFFE1C1674D23B83FAF5FF45 (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF786625FFFE1C1674A5397FFE56FDCE (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7819459 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7819461 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7819463 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7819465 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7819467 (DOI)
Is source of
Dataset: http://www.gbif.org/dataset/c69f3f81-45c7-4067-85bc-83f4cd6b964e (URL)

References

  • AMANO K., OISHI T. & TOKIOKA T. 2008. - Restoration attempt of submerged macrophytes in an eutrophic shallow lake in Japan.World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Ahupua'A: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/40976(316)271
  • APHA. 1995. - Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th ed. The American Public Health Association, Washington (DC), 1100 p.
  • BLINDOW I. 1992. - Decline of charophytes during eutrophication: comparison with angiosperms. Freshwater Biology 28 (1): 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00557.x
  • BLUME M., BLINDOW I., DAHLKE S. & VEDDER F. 2009. - Oospore variation in closely related Chara taxa. Journal of phycology 45 (5): 995-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529- 8817.2009.00725.x
  • BONIS A. & GRILLAS P. 2002. - Deposition, Germination and Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Charophyte Propagule Banks: A Review.Aquatic Botany 72 (3-4): 235-248.https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0304-3770(01)00203-0
  • BOSZKE P., PELECHATY M. & PUKACZ A. 2008. - Oospore dimensions and wall ornamentation in Chara braunii. Biologia 63 (4): 457-460. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-008-0079-y
  • BRAUN A. 1835. - Uebersicht der genauer bekannten Chara-Arten. Flora oder allgemeine botanische Zeitung 18: 49-73.
  • BRAUN A. & NORDSTEDT C. F. O. 1882. - Fragmente einer Monographie der Characeen. Koniglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 211 p.
  • CASANOVA M. T. 1997. - Oospore variation in three species of Chara (Charales, Chlorophyta). Phycologia 36 (4): 274-280. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-36-4-274.1
  • CHARRAD M., GHAZZALI N., BOITEAU V. & NIKNAFS A. 2014. - NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set. Journal of Statistical Software 61 (6): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v061.i06
  • DE WINTON M. D., DUGDALE T. M. & CLAYYON J. S. 2007. - An identification key for oospores of the extant charophytes of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 45 (3): 463-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288250709509729
  • FERREIRA F. A., CATIAN G. & POTT A. 2016. - Diaspore bank of aquatic macrophytes maintaining species diversity in a Neotropical pond. Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences 38 (4): 419-427. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v38i4.30802
  • GRILLAS P., GARCIA- MURILLO P., GEERTZ- HANSEN O., MARBA N., MONTES C., DUARTE C. M., TAN HAM L. & GROSSMANN A. 1993. - Submerged macrophyte seed bank in a Mediterranean temporary marsh: abundance and relationship with established vegetation. Oecologia 94 (1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00317293
  • HAAS J. N. 1994. - First identification key for charophyte oospores from central Europe. European Journal of Phycology 29 (4): 227- 235. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670269400650681
  • HOLLERBACH M. M. & KRASSAVINA L. K. 1983. -The charophytes - Charophyta. The Identification Manual of Freshwater Algae of USSR. Nauka, Leningrad, 189 p. (in Russian)
  • HOLZHAUSEN A., NOWAK P., NIEDRIG C., FEIKE M. & SCHUBERT H. 2015. - Morphometry of Chara aspera, C. canescens, C. baltica var. baltica, C. baltica var. liljebladii and C. intermedia oospores: Local variation versus taxonomic differences.Aquatic botany 120: 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.07.001
  • HOLZHAUSEN A., PORSCHE C. & SCHUBERT H. 2017. - Viability assessment and estimation of the germination potential of charophyte oospores: testing for site and species specificity. Botany Letters 165 (1): 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2 017.1393460
  • JOYE D. A. & REY- BOISSEZON A. 2015. - Will charophyte species increase or decrease their distribution in a changing climate? Aquatic Botany 120: 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. aquabot.2014.05.003
  • KRAUSE W. 1997. - Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Vol. 18: Charales (Charophyceae). Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, 202 p.
  • LU J., WANG H., PAN M., XIA J., XING W. & LIU G. 2012. - Using sediment seed banks and historical vegetation change data to develop restoration criteria for a eutrophic lake in China. Ecological Engineering 39:95-103.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.11.006
  • MANDAL D. K. & RAY S. 2004. - Taxonomic significance of micromorphology and dimensions of oospores in the genus Chara L. (Charales, Chlorophyta). Archives of Biological Sciences 56 (3-4): 131-138. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS0404131M
  • MELZER A. 1999. - Aquatic macrophytes as tools for lake management. Hydrobiologia 395: 181-190. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1017001703033
  • MIGULA W. 1897. - Die Characeen Deutschlands, Oesterreichs und der Schweiz: Unter Berucksichtigung aller Arten Europas. E. Kummer, Leipzig, 765 p.
  • NISHIHIRO J., NISHIHIRO M. A. & WASHITANI I. 2006. - Restoration of wetland vegetation using soil seed banks: lessons from a project in Lake Kasumigaura, Japan. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 2 (2): 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355- 006-0005-9
  • NOWAK P., STEINHARDT T., VON AMMON U., ROHDE H., SCHOOR A., HOLZHAUSEN A., SCHAIBLE R. & SCHUBERT H. 2017. - Diaspore bank analysis of Baltic coastal waters. Botany Letters 165 (1): 159-173.https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2017.1400464
  • OGLE D. H., DOLL J. C., WHEELER P. & DINNO A. 2021. - FSA: Fisheries Stock Analysis. R package version 0.9.1. Available from https://github.com/droglenc/FSA
  • POHLERT T. 2021.- PMCMRplus:Calculate Pairwise Multiple Comparisons of Mean Rank Sums Extended. R package version 1.9.3. Available from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PMCMRplus
  • PROCTOR V. W. 1975. - The nature of charophyte species. Phycologia 14 (2): 97-113. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031- 8884-14-2-97.1
  • PUKACZ A., BOSZKE P., PELECHATY M. J. & RAABE U. 2012. - Comparative study of the oospore morphology of two populations of a rare species Chara baueri A. Braun in Cedynia (Poland) and Batzlow (Germany). Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 81 (2): 131-136. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2012.012
  • R CORE TEAM. 2021. - R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available from https://www.R-project.org/
  • SCHNEIDER C., LAIZE C. L. R., ACREMAN M. C. & FLORKE M. 2013. - How will climate change modify river flow regimes in Europe? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 17 (1): 325-339. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-325-2013
  • SCHNEIDER S. C., TRAJANOVSKA S., BIBERDZIC V., MARKOVIC A., TALEVSKA M., VELJANOVSKA- SARAFILOVSKA E., DURAsKOVIC P., JOVANOVIC K. & CARA M. 2020. - The Balkan Macrophyte Index (BMI) for ecological status classification of lakes. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 72 (3): 439-454.
  • SOULIE- MARSCHE I. 1989. - Etude comparee de gyrogonites de charophytes actuelles et fossiles et phylogenie des genres actuels. Imprimerie des Tilleuls, Millau, 237 p.
  • SOULIE- MARSCHE I. 2004. - Charophyte Gyrogonites, the Result of Enantioselective Influence 250 Million Years Ago, in PALYI G., ZUCCHI C. & CAGLIOTI C. (eds), Progress in Biological Chirality. Elsevier, Oxford: 365-375.
  • TER BRAAK C. J. & sMILAUER P. 2012. - Canoco reference manual and user's guide: software for ordination, version 5.0. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, 496 p.
  • TRBOJEVIC I., MARKOVIC A., BLAZENCIC J., SUBAKOV SIMIC G., NOWAK P., BALLOT A. & SCHNEIDER S. 2020a. - Genetic and morphological variation in Chara contraria and a taxon morphologically resembling Chara connivens. Botany Letters 167 (2): 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2019.1703808
  • TRBOJEVIC I., MILOVANOVIC V. & SUBAKOV SIMIC G. 2020b. - The Discovery of the Rare Chara baueri (Charales, Charophyceae) in Serbia. Plants 9 (11): 1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/ plants9111606
  • URBANIAK J. & GABKA M. 2014. -Polish Charophytes: An Illustrated Guide to Identification. Universytet Przyrodiczy We Wroclawiu, Wroclaw, 120 p.
  • VEDDER F. 2004. - Morphologie und Taxonomie rezenter und subfossiler Characeen-Oosporen aus der Ostsee.Rostocker Meeresbiologische Beitrage 13: 43-54.
  • WOOD R. D. & IMAHORI K. 1965. - A Revision of the Characeae. First Part: Monograph of the Characeae. J. Cramer Verlag, Weinheim, 904 p.