Published April 3, 2023 | Version v1
Journal article Open

POLITICAL TRANSFORMATIONS IN UKRAINE (1991-2019): RUNNING IN A CIRCLE ON THE WAY TO DEMOCRACY

  • 1. National Aviation University

Description

The article at tempts to comprehend the transformations of the political regime in Ukraine in the period 1991-2019. The features of the political development of the country since the declaration of independence, the specifics and logic of the functioning of the political regime in Ukraine during the presidency of L. Kravchuk, L. Kuchma, V. Yushchenko, V. Yanukovych and P. Poroshenko are determined. The trajectory of political development since the declaration of independence is analyzed through the prism of transitological studies. Base don’t his, it was determined hat in this process Ukraine fell into an “institutional rut”, when the change of presidents and government teams did not lead to a consistent movement towards democracy, but rather had a pendulum effect, thereby ensuring the country’s stable stay in the “gray zone” between democracy and authoritarianism. The chain of political and regime transformations in Ukraine began with the regime of the first President L. Kravchuk, which can be characterized as unconsolidated competitive authoritarianism. It functioned in a situation of constant struggle between the centers of power for the future institutional structure of the state. Since the adoption of the Constitution in 1996, it began to evolve towards consolidation, but for a number of reasons, the political regime in Ukraine in 1996-2004 reached the level of semi-consolidated competitive authoritarianism. The period of V. Yushchenko’s presidency was marked by the transformation of the country’s political regime into an unstable electoral democracy, which, after President V. Yanukovych came to power, again regressed to the level of competitive authoritarianism: in 2010-2012 – semi-consolidated, in 2012-2013 ‑ consolidated. The Revolution of Dignity marked another breakthrough in democratization and the transition to a cartel electoral democracy. However, since mid-2016, the Poroshenko regime began to evolve into unconsolidated competitive authoritarianism.

Files

Pash_Hom-135-158.pdf

Files (382.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:64edc3b25da4618ca4bcdd7b5ca7857f
382.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Vonsovych, S. H. (2014). Okreslennia instytutsionalnoho landshaftu politychnoho tranzytu v Ukraini [Outline of the institutional landscape of political transit in Ukraine]. Politolohichnyi visnyk Political science bulletin, 73, 304-313 [in Ukrainian].
  • Hanzha, A. M. (2015). Neopatrymonialnyi politychnyi rezhym v Ukraini 2010-2015: analiz funktsionuvannia politychnoi systemy [Neopatrimonial political regime in Ukraine 2010-2015: analysis of the functioning of the political system]. Visnyk KhNU im. V. N. Karazina. Seriia: Pytannia politolohii Bulletin of V. N. Karazin KhNU. Series: Questions of political science, 28, 56-62 [in Ukrainian].
  • Haponenko, V.A. (2019). Perspektyvy evoliutsii hibrydnoi instytutsiinoi systemy suchasnoi Ukrainy [Prospects of the evolution of the hybrid institutional system of modern Ukraine]. Naukovi pratsi MAUP. Seriia Politychni nauky Scientific works of MAUP. Political science series, 58 (2), 27-32 [in Ukrainian].
  • Denysenko, V. I. (2018). Rezhym Viktora Yanukovycha v dyskursi ukrainskoi nauky [Viktor Yanukovych's regime in the discourse of Ukrainian science]. Naukovi pratsi istorychnoho fakultetu Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu Scientific works of the Faculty of History of Zaporizhzhya National University, 50, 166-170 [in Ukrainian].
  • Zelenko, H. (2021). Kryzy politychnoho rozvytku v Ukraini: prychyny ta zmist [Crises of political development in Ukraine: causes and content]. Politychni doslidzhennia Political studies, 2, 33-61 [in Ukrainian].
  • Kuts, H. M. (2014). Perypetii formuvannia politychnoho rezhymu v postradianskii Ukraini: dosvid maidaniv [The vicissitudes of political regime formation in post-Soviet Ukraine: the experience of the Maidans]. Suchasne suspilstvo Modern society, 1, 82-94 [in Ukrainian].
  • Matsiievskyi, Yu. V. (2016). U pasttsi hibrydnosti: zygzagy transformatsii politychnoho rezhymu v Ukraini (1991-2014) [Trapped in hybridity: zigzag transformations of the political regime in Ukraine (1991-2014)]. Chernivtsi: Knyhy – XXI [in Ukrainian].
  • Panfilov, O.Yu. (Ed.) (2019). Sotsialno-humanitarna sfera Ukrainy v suchasnykh dyskursakh [The social and humanitarian sphere of Ukraine in modern discourses]: monohrafiia. Kharkiv: KhIF KNTEU, vydavets O.A. Miroshnychenko [in Ukrainian].
  • Trach, A. S. (2015). Politychnyi rezhym postradianskoi Ukrainy: mizh politsentryzmom ta monotsentryzmom [The political regime of post-Soviet Ukraine: between polycentrism and monocentrism]. Aktualni problemy polityky Actual problems of politics, 55, 154-162 [in Ukrainian].
  • Trebin, M. P. (2011). Vplyv osoblyvostei postradianskoi transformatsii na suchasnyi stan Ukrainy [The influence of features of the post-Soviet transformation on the current state of Ukraine]. Praktychna filosofiia Practical philosophy, 4 (42), 15-26 [in Ukrainian].
  • Fisun, O. (2016). Neformalni instytuty ta neopatrimonialna demokratiia [Informal institutions and neopatrimonial democracy]. Ahora Agora, 17, 9-13 [in Ukrainian].
  • Levitsky, S., & Way, L.A. (2002). Elections without Democracy. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13 (2), 51-65.
  • Trebin, M. P. (2010). Politychna kultura vladnoi elity Ukrainy v umovakh rozbudovy demokratychnoi pravovoi derzhavy [The political culture of the ruling elite of Ukraine in the conditions of the development of a democratic legal state]. Problemy ta perspektyvy formuvannia natsionalnoi humanitarno-tekhnichnoi elity Problems and prospects of the formation of the national humanitarian and technical elite: zb. nauk. prats (Pp. 110-118) / Za red. L.L. Tovazhnianskoho, O.H. Romanovskoho. Issue 26 (30). Kharkiv: NTU «KhPI» [in Ukrainian].