Published March 16, 2023 | Version https://www.ijassjournal.com/2021/V4I2/4146575478.pdf
Journal article Open

TESTIMONIUM DE АUDITU AS INDICATIVE EVIDENCE IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF REFORMING INDONESIACRIMINAL PROCEDURAL CODE

  • 1. Master of Law Science, Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
  • 2. (Lecturer in Master of Law Science, Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)
  • 3. 3 (Lecturer ini Master of Law Science, Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)

Description

The fact that there are still many decisions that consider the testimony of de audited witnesses, has become a very long debate among academics, especially regarding the acceptance of de audited witnesses referring to the Federal Rules of Evidence in the United States, which is the latest breakthrough regarding the use of de audited witnesses, namely through exceptions of de auditu witnesses or exceptions of hearsay. The research method used in this case is through a normative juridical approach and the approach is divided through several approaches, namely the statutory approach, the case law approach, the conceptual approach, and the comparative law approach. then analyzed qualitatively, namely data analysis by analyzing, interpreting, drawing conclusions. The results of the study show that the existence of the Constitutional Court decision number 65 / PUU-VIII / 2010 paved the way for de auditu witnesses to testify in court through indication evidence

Files

4146575478.pdf

Files (854.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e24edd296cc1a7df326165f11fb3b99a
854.4 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Alfitra, S. H. (2011). Hukum pembuktian dalam beracara pidana, perdata, dan korupsi di Indonesia. RAIH ASA SUKSES.
  • Andi, H. (2008). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafik
  • Anggraini, W., & Mahargyo, R. (2015). Penerapan Hukum Pembuktian Saksi Testimonium De Auditu Sebagai Alasan Pengajuan Kasasi Penuntut Umum Dalam Perkara Pengguguran Kandungan. Verstek, 3(1)
  • Chazawi, A. (2006). Hukum pembuktian tindak pidana korupsi: UU no. 31 tahun 1999 diubah dengan UU no. 20 tahun 2001. Alumni.
  • Chazawi, A. (2011). Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Cet. 1. Penerbit Bayumedia Publishing, Malang
  • Efendi, J., Widodo, I. G., & Lutfianingsih, F. F. (2016). Kamus istilah hukum populer: meliputi hukum perdata, hukum pidana, hukum administrasi & hukum tata negara, serta hukum internasional dilengkapi penjelasan dan dasar hukum. Prenadamedia Group
  • Erwinsyahbana, T., & Syahbana, T. R. F. (2018). Perspektif Negara Hukum Indonesia Berdasarkan Pancasila
  • Ewaschuk, E. G. (1978). Hearsay evidence. Osgoode Hall LJ, 16, 407
  • Farida, M. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan Dasar Pembentukannya. Jakarta: Kanisu