Brief considerations on Language Standardization and IntraLanguage Change
- 1. (English Language and Literature, Universidad de Cuenca,Ecuador)
- 2. (English Language and Literature, Universidad de Cuenca, Ecuador)
Description
Despite the emphasis on change, both synchronic and diachronic, that Sociolinguistics has, language standardization is a process that starkly reveals the social and cultural dynamics and struggles of language use, such as nationalism, exclusion, political and cultural dominance, among others. Under this perspective, this paper explores the definition of language standardization, along with the conceptualization and characterization of two contemporary models: the rationalist and the romantic, with pertinent exemplification. Complementarily, definitions and examples of intra-language change will be explored, placing special emphasis on the discrimination between language usage and use.
Files
4146575167.pdf
Files
(440.0 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:0551d90cf8016a5f4e332744e3184c56
|
440.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. (1998). Varieties and Variation. In Coulmas, F. (Ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
- Nordquist, R. (2017, April 11). Language Standardization. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-language-standardization1691099.
- Youman, I. (2008). English Literature. Cuenca: Universidad de Cuenca.
- Bright, W. (1998). Social Factor in Language Change. In Coulmas, F. (Ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Denison, N. (1998). Language Change in Progress: Variation as it Happens. In Coulmas, F. (Ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- DeVillar, A. (2015, June 03). Introduction to ESL/EFL Research. Lecture presented at Universidad de Cuenca, Ecuador.
- Geeraerts, Dirk. 2003. Cultural models of linguistic standardization. In René Dirven, Roslyn Frank & Martin Pütz (eds.), Cognitive Models in Language and Thought. Ideology, Metaphors and Meanings (pp.25-68). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyte