Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published March 1, 2023 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Atmospheric oxygen as a tracer for fossil fuel carbon dioxide: a sensitivity study in the UK

  • 1. University of Bristol
  • 2. University of East Anglia
  • 3. National Physical Laboratory & University of Edinburgh
  • 4. Plymouth Marine Laboratory
  • 5. National Physical Laboratory
  • 6. Imperial College London
  • 7. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
  • 8. Wageningen University and Research,
  • 9. Met Office
  • 10. University of East Angli
  • 11. University of Edinburgh
  • 12. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry

Contributors

Contact person:

  • 1. University of Bristol

Description

Abstract. We investigate the use of oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) measurements for the estimation of the fossil fuel component of atmospheric CO2 in the UK. Atmospheric potential oxygen (APO) – a tracer that combines O2 and CO2, minimising the influence of terrestrial biosphere fluxes – is simulated at three sites in the UK, two of which have APO measurements. We present a set of model experiments that estimate the sensitivity of APO simulations to key inputs: fluxes from the ocean, fossil fuel flux magnitude and distribution, the APO baseline, and the ratio of O2 to CO2 fluxes from fossil fuel combustion and the terrestrial biosphere. To estimate the influence of uncertainties in ocean fluxes, we compared three ocean O2 flux estimates, from the NEMO – ERSEM and ECCO-Darwin ocean models, and the Jena Carboscope inversion. The sensitivity of APO to fossil fuel emission magnitudes and to terrestrial biosphere and fossil fuel exchange ratios was investigated through Monte Carlo sampling within literature uncertainty ranges, and by comparing different inventory estimates. Of the factors that could potentially compromise APO-derived fossil fuel CO2 estimates, we find that the ocean O2 flux estimate has the largest overall influence at the three sites in the UK. At times, this influence is comparable to the contribution to APO of simulated fossil fuel CO2. We find that simulations using different ocean fluxes differ from each other substantially, with no single estimate, or a simulation with zero ocean flux, providing a significantly closer fit to the observations. Furthermore, the uncertainty in the ocean contribution to APO could lead to uncertainty in defining an appropriate regional background from the data. Our findings suggest that the contribution of non-terrestrial sources need to be well accounted for, in order to reduce their potential influence on inferred fossil fuel CO2.

Files

Files (5.8 GB)

Name Size Download all
md5:157c49944fb8ff741dccefe80df7328a
1.6 GB Download
md5:0b72833909a43bf6a85b756f755c9049
60.3 MB Download
md5:7429698ff767c31ffe157ce065c29ef5
7.2 MB Download
md5:8a11f5b35b000ef86586f44846a594b1
772.3 kB Download
md5:b2acbce41c12cba48d75789049ef8910
878.3 kB Download
md5:6806bbe5d978479850a5bbf953f77bab
8.5 MB Download
md5:8c91e86ca9fc899e5ca8d9e653376cb7
3.9 GB Download
md5:19e8477c5b1d02f1ef41813d0cd972bd
44.5 MB Download
md5:185265eb7b9fd046f462f1dda156df9d
7.2 MB Download
md5:ea17cb50fa44d3e9ec0b35c61b4f5b54
234.5 MB Download
md5:94caa99fbe0f871e4b3d53e0a0448d62
772.3 kB Download
md5:58a3549d1164913a4660b5b49edfd691
843.3 kB Download
md5:0f4390ff8a8e0684fdd65bd3348eb5eb
878.2 kB Download