Modern Technology and Religious Culture: Some Methodological Aspects
Description
The aim of the article is to identify the methodological aspects of modern technology and religious culture correlation. The methodological basis of the article is grounded on the following methods: critical analysis of culturological and religious sources, concrete historical analysis and interdisciplinary synthesis, induction and deduction, sociological methods for empirical data analyzing, in particular, content analysis and the method of participant observation and theoretical journalistic methodology. From the concrete scientific methods, problem-chronological and system-structural, social-phenomenological analysis and visual anthropology methods were used. Scientific novelty of the article consists in the study of methodological aspects of modern technologies and religious culture comparison. Conclusions. Religion contributes to the development of knowledge and technology: given the fact that at the present stage of religious development science has become a reference characteristic for major religions and religious denominations, many of them strive to prove their own unique role in the development of high-tech, IT and AI. Religion is one of the most important factors in the modern technological politics, and one of the aspects of this impact is the ethical issues of combat robots construction.
Files
Modern_Technology_and_Religious_Culture_Some_Methodological_Aspects.pdf
Files
(482.0 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:bbac4fa755030db7e4e1e176fcf67989
|
482.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Byleva, D.S. (2018). Informatsionno-kommunikatsionnye tekhnologii i religiya: ot kommunikatsii k virtualizatsii [Information and communication technologies and religion: from communication to virtualization]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti, vol. 9, no.1, pp. 63–71.
- Chapman, M.R. (2003). In Search of Stupidity: Over 20 Years of High-Tech Marketing Disasters. NY: Apress.
- Dick, P.F. (2006). Osnovy kulturologiі [Basics of Cultural Studies]. Rostov-nа- Donu: Feniks.
- Dorokhova, M.A. (2008). Istoriya kultury [Cultural history]. Moscow: Eksmo.
- Filicheva, N.F., Makarskaya, T.V. and Nikulenko, A.A. (2017). Kultura v globalnom mire informatsionnykh tekhnologiy [Culture in the global world of information technology]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, vol. 27, issue 1, pp. 35–40.
- Gordieiev, R.V. (1998). Krosskulturnye problemy mezhdunarodnogo menedzhmenta [Cross-cultural problems of international management]. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom, no. 1, pp. 3–24.
- Kudrina, T.A. (1996). Religiya v strukture informatsionnoi kultury [Religion in the structure of information culture]. Informatsionnaya kultura lichnosti: proshloie, nastoyashcheie i budushcheie: tezisy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Russia, Krasnodar-Novorossiisk, September 11–14. Krasnodar State University of Culture and Arts, рр. 38.
- Kutyrev, V.A. (2015). Kultura i tekhnologiya: borba mirov [Culture and technology: the struggle of the worlds]. Moscow; Berlin: Direkt-Media.
- Pimentel, R.B., Elliot, R.C., Holton, R., Lorenzano, P. and Arlt, H. eds. (2010). Religion, Culture and Sustainable Development. Vols. 3. Paris: UNESCO.
- Randall, L. (2011). Knocking on Heavenʼs Door: How Physics and Scientific Thinking Illuminate the Universe and the Modern World. NY: Ecco.
- Skazkina, S.D. ed. (1987). Nastolnaya kniga ateista [Atheist Handbook]. Moscow: Politizdat.
- Sorokina, V.N. (2003). Kultura informatsionnogo obshchestva [Information Society Culture]. Vvedenie v kulturologiyu, pp. 119–124.
- Yapontsy sobrali robota–boga i teper poklonyayutsya emu. Iskusstvennyi intellekt reshil porabotit mir? [The Japanese have assembled a robot god and now worship it. Has Artificial intelligence decided to enslave the world?]. (n.d.). [online] Available at:<https://360tv.ru/news/tekst/ii-reshil-porabotit-mir/> [Accessed: 07.04.2019].