ELECTRONICS & ELECTRICAL DOMAIN
Published February 14, 2023 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Defect Density Dependent Performance Analysis of Perovskite Solar Cell for Different Electron Transport Layers

Creators

  • 1. Dept. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh
  • 2. Dept. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Northern University, Bangladesh

Description

In recent years, the fourth generation of solar cells, known as hybrid organic-inorganic perovskite solar cells (PSCs), has made significant progress. In PSCs, the absorber layer is made of the economically advantageous material Methyl ammonium lead halide (CH3NH3PbI3). The performance of PSCs depends heavily on the parameters of electron transport material (ETM), absorber layer and Hole Transport Layer (HTL). In this study, Solar Cell Capacitance Simulator (SCAPS)-1D was used to evaluate the performance of perovskite based solar cells for three different ETM Layers: ZnO, TiO2 and SnO2. Furthermore, by varying the defect density of the absorption layer, this study investigated Voc, Jsc, FF, and Efficiency. According to the investigation, the Jsc, Voc, FF and PCE values of perovskite solar cells decrease drastically when the defect density of the perovskite layer increases. When the defect density went from 1×10-15cm-3 to 1×10-19cm-3, the power conversion efficiency had significantly reduced from 23% to 3% for TiO2, 22% to 6% for ZnO and 22% to 3% for SnO2. ZnO as ETM showed the most stability to defect density variation hence discovered to be the most suitable in every scenario for low-cost, high-efficiency solar technology.

Files

Defect Density Dependent Performance Analysis of Perovskite Solar Cell for Different Electron Transport Layers.pdf

Files (672.1 kB)

Additional details

References

  • 1. P. K. Patel, "Device simulation of highly efficient eco ‑ friendly ­ perovskite solar cell," Sci. Rep., pp. 1–11, 2021.
  • 2. B. M. Soucase, I. G. Pradas, and K. R. Adhikari, "Numerical Simulations on Perovskite Photovoltaic Devices," 2016.
  • 3. G. Haidari, "Comparative 1D optoelectrical simulation of the perovskite solar cell Comparative 1D optoelectrical simulation of the perovskite solar cell," vol. 085028, no. August, 2019.
  • 4. M. A. Green, A. Ho-baillie, and H. J. Snaith, "The emergence of perovskite solar cells," vol. 8, no. July, 2014.
  • 5. D. Swisulski, "Simulation investigation of perovskite-based solar cells," no. 5, pp. 99–102, 2021.
  • 6. F. Hossain, M. Faisal, and H. Okada, "Device Modeling and Performance Analysis of Perovskite Solar Cells Based on Similarity with Inorganic Thin Film Solar Cells Structure," no. December, pp. 8–10, 2016.
  • 7. S. Mahjabin, M. Haque, K. Sobayel, M. S. Jamal, M. A. Islam, and V. Selvanathan, "Perceiving of Defect Tolerance in Perovskite Absorber Layer for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cell," vol. XX, pp. 1–10, 2020.
  • 8. V. Srivastava, S. H. Reddy, B. Anitha, and A. G. Manoj, "A comparative study of defect density of states for single, mixed and bulk heterojunction perovskite solar cells A Comparative Study of Defect Density of States for Single, Mixed and Bulk Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells," vol. 050013, no. March, 2019.
  • 9. P. S. Cell, "Design, Performance, and Defect Density Analysis of Efficient Eco-Friendly," vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 2837–2843, 2020.
  • 10. W. Yin, T. Shi, Y. Yan, W. Yin, T. Shi, and Y. Yan, "Unusual defect physics in CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 perovskite solar cell absorber," vol. 063903, 2014.