IMPACT OF SUSPENSION TRAINING ON PHYSICAL FITNESS VARIABLES OF SCHOOL BOYS
Creators
- 1. * Ph.D Research Scholar, Department of Physical Education, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu ** Professor, Department of Physical Education, Bharathiar
Description
Suspension Training has a place in practically every type of training program. It can be used to develop core strength, mobility, joint strength and integrity, and basic and foundational strength, as well as to target specific strength goals. It can serve as a stand-alone training program or be used with another training program. Whatever the goals, suspension training can help an individual achieve success and improve training outcomes. This study was designed to impact of suspension training on physical fitness variables of school boys. To achieve the purpose of the study 30 school boys were selected from Government Higher Secondary School, Anthiyur. Their age ranged between 15 and 16 years and they were divided into two equal groups consists of 15 each. Group I underwent the suspension training and Group II acted as control group. The training was given to the group I for 3 days per week for the period of 12 weeks. The group II was not given any sort of training except their routine work. The data were collected from the subjects was statistically analyzed with dependent ‘t’ test to find out significant improvement if any at 0.05 level of confidence. The results speculated that the abdominal strength and cardio vascular endurance of school boys improved significantly due to the suspension training with the limitations.
Files
252.pdf
Files
(360.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:172414b148f5cb5623ebc4a76ae57471
|
360.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. Byrne, J.M., N.S. Bishop, A.M. Caines, K.A. Crane, A.M. Feaver, and G.E. Pearcey. 2014. Effect of using a suspension training system on muscle activation during the performance of a front plank exercise. J. Strength Cond. Res. 28 (11) 3049-3055. 2. Chu, D., and R. Korchemny. 1993. Sprinting stride actions: analysis and evaluations. NSCA Journal 11 (6): 48-53. 3. Dolati, M., Ghazalian, F., Abednatanzi, H. (2017). The Effect of a Period of TRX Training on Lipid Profile and Body Composition in Overweight Women. International Journal of Sports Science. 7 (3), 151-158. 4. Garnacho-Castaño, M.V., Jiménez, P.J., Monroy, A.J., and Mate-Munoz, J.L. 2014. Effects of instability versus traditional resistance training on strength, power and velocity in untrained men. J. Sports Sci. Med. 13: 460-468. 5. Gidu, D., Oltean, A. (2017). Body Positions, Procedures and Principles in Tax Training – Theoretical Considerations. Naval Academy Scientific Bulletin. 20 (1), 442-449. 6. Janot, J., et al. 2013. Effects of TRX versus traditional resistance training programs on measures of muscular performance in adults. Journal of Fitness Research. 2 (2): 23-38. 7. Melrose D., and J. Dawes. 2015. Resistance characteristics of the TRX suspension 8. Mok, N.W., E.W. Yeung, J.C. Cho, S.C. Hui, K.C. Liu, and C.H. Pang. 2015. Core muscle activity during suspension exercises. J. Sci. Med. Sport. 18 (2): 189-194. 9. Orr, R. 1999. The functional continuum. www.ptonthenet.com/articles/The-Functional-Continuum-557#sthash.zJlKDQS3.dpuf. 10. Siff, M.C. 2003. Supertraining, 6th ed. Denver, CO: Supertraining Institute. 11. Snarr, R.L., and M.R. Esco. 2014. Electromyographical comparison of plank variations performed with and without instability devices. J. Strength Cond. Res. 28 (11) 3298-3305. 12. Snarr, R.L., M.R. Esco, E.V. Witte, C.T. Jenkins, and R.M. Brannan. 2013. Electromyographic Activity of rectus abdominis during a suspension push-up compared to traditional exercises. J. Exerc. Physiol. Online.16 (3): 1-8. 13. Training system at different angles and distances from the hanging point. J. Athl. Enhancement. 4:1.