Published January 31, 2023 | Version v1
Dataset Restricted

Psoas Cross-Sectional Measurements Using Manual CT Segmentation before and after Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR).

  • 1. Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20100 Milan, Italy.
  • 2. Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy.
  • 3. 2Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy. 3
  • 4. Clinical Research Unit, Cardiovascular Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy.
  • 5. Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy.

Description

Monti CB, Righini P, Bonanno MC, Capra D, Mazzaccaro D, Giannetta M, Nicolino GM, Nano G, Sardanelli F, Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Secchi F. Psoas Cross-Sectional Measurements Using Manual CT Segmentation before and after Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR). J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 12;11(14):4023. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144023. PMID: 35887786; PMCID: PMC9325160.

Abstract

Sarcopenia has been associated with an increased incidence of adverse outcomes, including higher mortality, after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). We aim to use computed tomography (CT) to quantify changes in total psoas muscles area (PMA) and psoas muscle density (PMD) after EVAR, and to evaluate the reproducibility of both measurements. PMA and PMD were assessed via manual segmentation of the psoas muscle on pre- and post-operative CT scans belonging to consecutive patients who underwent EVAR. Wilcoxon test was used to compare PMA and PMD before and after EVAR, and inter- and intra-reader agreements of both methods were evaluated through Bland-Altman analysis. A total of 50 patients, 42 of them males (84%), were included in the study. PMA changes from 1243 mm2 (1006-1445 mm2) to 1102 mm2 (IQR 937-1331 mm2), after EVAR (p < 0.001). PMD did not vary between pre-EVAR (33 HU, IQR 26.5-38.7 HU) and post-EVAR (32 HU, IQR 26-37 HU, p = 0.630). At inter-reader Bland-Altman analysis, PMA showed a bias of 64.0 mm2 and a coefficient of repeatability (CoR) of 359.2 mm2, whereas PMD showed a bias of -2.43 HU and a CoR of 6.19 HU. At intra-reader Bland-Altman analysis, PMA showed a bias of -81.1 mm2 and a CoR of 394.6 mm2, whereas PMD showed a bias of 1.41 HU and a CoR of 6.36 HU. In conclusion, PMA decreases after EVAR. A good intra and inter-reader reproducibility was observed for both PMA and PMD. We thus propose to use PMA during the follow-up of patients who underwent EVAR to monitor muscle depletion after surgery.

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Request access

If you would like to request access to these files, please fill out the form below.

You need to satisfy these conditions in order for this request to be accepted:

These data are available upon duly motivated request to the corresponding author of the article

You are currently not logged in. Do you have an account? Log in here