Published December 29, 2022 | Version v1
Book Open

Language. Culture. Discourse

Creators

  • 1. Kyiv National Linguistic University
  • 2. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

Description

The monograph represents a new interpretation of the relationship between the phenomenon of a Man and the triad of LANGUAGE – CULTURE – DISCOURSE.

Taking into account the new cognitive-discursive approach, the authors made an attempt to harmonize their scientific observations with the content of the studied macrolinguistic issues in the three parts of the monograph.

A general methodology was developed for analysis of factual material, the results of which proved that language and culture are sources for the construction of various types of discourse (artistic, political, and religious). The key narratives of each type of discourse reproduce the value con- stants and dominants of ethnic groups at various stages of civilizational and planetary development.

The concept of the monograph is the triad of LANGUAGE – CULTURE – DISCOURSE that is interpreted as an extremely complex synergistic continuum of an open type, which takes on material form with the participation of a Man, i.e. a representative of certain social communities and, at the same time, a generator of various types of speech, which ensures efficient communication of communication participants.

Files

126-Book Manuscript-482-2-10-20221230.pdf

Files (8.7 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:76d99d2747770abad98c019b0dea088b
8.7 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Mihalcea, R., Radev, D. (2011). Graph Based Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511976247
  • Fabian, M. P. (1998). Etyketna leksyka v ukrainskii, anhliiskii ta uhorskii movakh. Uzhhorod: IVA, 256. Available at: https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/36796
  • Klymenko, N. F., Peshchak, M. M., Savchenko, I. F. (1982). Formalizovani osnovy semantychnoi klasyfikatsii leksyky. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 250.
  • Zasanska, N. D. (2016). Leksyko-semantychne pole kryza v ukrayinskiy ta anhliyskiy movakh: hrafo-matrychnyy i statystychnyy aspekty. Kirovohrad. Available at: https://npu.edu.ua/images/file/vidil_aspirant/dicer/D_26.053.26/Zasanska1.pdf
  • Eijck, J., Unger, Ch. (2010). Computational Semantics with Functional Programming. Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511778377
  • Kucher, I. A. (2015). Linhvokohnityvne modelyuvannya leksyko-semantychnoho polya diyesliv rukhu u finskiy i ukrayinskiy movakh. Kyiv.
  • Trier, J. (1932). Sprachliche Felder. Zeitschrift für deutsche Bildung, 8 (9), 417–427.
  • Ipsen, G. (1924). Der alte Orient und die Indogermanen. Stand und Aufgaben der Sprachvwissenschaft. Festschrift für W. Streiberg, 200–237.
  • Robbins, R. H. (1979). A Short History of Linguistics. Longman Linguistics Library, 296. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315843186
  • Ufimtseva, A. A. (1962). Opyt izucheniya leksiki kak sistemy (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka). Moscow: Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 288. Available at: https://www.twirpx.com/file/774246/
  • Levitckii, V. V. (1989). Statisticheskoe izuchenie leksicheskoi semantiki. Kyiv: UMK VO, 155.
  • Selivanova, O. O. (2008). Suchasna linhvistyka: napriamy ta problemy. Poltava: Dovkillia-K, 711. Available at: http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/ulib/item/UKR0001849
  • Vasilev, L. M. (1971). Teoriia semanticheskikh polei. Voprosy iazykoznaniia, 5, 105–113.
  • Kocherhan, M. P. (2007). Leksyko-semantychna systema. Ukrayinska mova: Entsyklopediya. Ukrayinska entsyklopediya im. M. P. Bazhana.
  • Veremchuk, E. O. (2017). Leksyko-semantychne pole Space / Kosmos v anhliiskii movi: linhvokohnityvnyi ta linhvosynerhetychnyi aspekty. Zaporizhzhia, 253. Available at: http://phd.znu.edu.ua/page/dis/02_2017/Veremchuk_dis-.pdf
  • Ivanenko, N. V. (2007). Systemno-strukturna orhanizatsiya leksyko-semantychnoho polya dobro v ukrayinskiy ta anhliyskiy movakh. Naukovyy visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriya Linhvistyka, 5, 60‒64.
  • Nikitin, M. V. (1996). Kurs lingvisticheskoy semantiki. Saint-Petersburg: Nauchnyy tsentr problem dialoga, 760.
  • Matcuk, A. P. (1987). Semanticheskie polia so znacheniem interpretatcii otcenki. Semantika, pragmatika, tekst, 290, 69–80.
  • Kocherhan, M. P. (2001). Vstup do movoznavstva. Kyiv: Akademiyam, 368. Available at: https://chtyvo.org.ua/authors/Kocherhan_Mykhailo/Vstup_do_movoznavsta.pdf
  • Boiko, N. I. (2021). The specifics of the lexical and semantic field of the concept «war» in Alexander Dovzhenko's film story «Ukraine on fire». Literature and Culture of Polissya, 102 (17f), 116–130. doi: https://doi.org/10.31654/2520-6966-2021-17f-102-116-130
  • Blyznyuk, K. R. (2019). Leksyko-semantychne pole "patriotyzm" v ukrayinskiy, anhliyskiy i polskiy movakh. Vinnytsia.
  • Golovashchenko, Yu. S. (2022). Struktura leksyko-semantychnoho polya u mezhakh khudozhnoho tekstu. Naukovyy visnyk Chernivetskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Yuriya Fedkovycha. Hermanska filolohiya, 835-836, 25‒33.
  • Kopytina, A. S (2021). Linguocognitive and sociolingual parameters of the lexicalsemantic field "space" (in English, Russian, Ukrainian and French). Kyiv, 265.
  • Hertsovska, N. O. (2011). Lexical and semantic field of SUCCESS as a constituent of categorization and conceptualization of reality (on the material of the English and Ukrainian languages). Kyiv, 23. Available at: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=ARD&P21DBN=ARD&Z21ID=&Image_file_name=DOC/2011/11GNOIKD.zip&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1
  • Liashuk, A. M. (2008). Semantychna struktura leksyky na poznachennia poniat prava ukrainskoi ta anhliiskoi mov. Kirovohrad: KOD, 224.
  • Atkins, B. T. S. (2008). The Oxford Guide to Practical Lexicography. Oxford University Press, 540.
  • Luchyk, A. A. (2009). Komponentnyy analiz u zistavnykh doslidzhennyakh leksychnykh odynyts. Suchasni doslidzhennya z inozemnoyi filolohiyi, 7, 258‒262.
  • Cantor, G.; Zermelo, E. (Ed.) (1962). Gesammelte Abhandlungen: Mathematischen und Philosophischen Inhalts. Berlin: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00274-2
  • Serpinskiy, V. O. (1966). Teorii mnozhestv. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye, 62.
  • Kocherhan, M. P. (2006). Osnovy zistavnoho movoznavstva. Kyiv: Akademiya, 424.
  • Bilodid, I. K. (Ed.) (1970–1980). Slovnyk ukrayinskoyi movy. Available at: http://sum.in.ua/
  • Rusanivsky, V. M. (Ed.) (2010). Slovnyk ukrayinskoyi movy. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. Available at: https://services.ulif.org.ua/expl/Entry/index?wordid=1&page=030
  • Melnychuk, O. S. (Ed.) (1974). Slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv. Kyiv: Holovna redaktsiya "Ukrayinska radyanska entsyklopediya". Available at: http://ukrajintsine.narod.ru/slovnyk_meln/index.html
  • Busel, V. T. (Ed.). (2005). Velykyy tlumachnyy slovnyk suchasnoyi ukrayinskoyi movy: 250000. Kyiv; Irpin: Perun, 1728. Available at: http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/ulib/item/UKR0000989
  • Frolov, A. F., Zadorozhna, V. I.; Dzyuba, I. M., Zhukovskyy, A. I., Zheleznyak, M. H. et al. (Eds.) (2009). Epidemiya. Entsyklopediya Suchasnoyi Ukrayiny: elektronna versiya. Instytut entsyklopedychnykh doslidzhen NAN Ukrayiny. Available at: https://esu.com.ua/search_articles.php?id=17931
  • Vusyk, O. S. (2019). Slovnyk synonimiv ukrayinskoyi movy. Available at: https://1674.slovaronline.com/
  • Desmedt, P. (2011). Sébastien Heymann ‒ Le cartographe des données. Available at: https://www.usinenouvelle.com/article/prix-science-sebastien-heymann-le-cartographe-des-donnees.N164939
  • Kotiurova, I. A. (2020). Corpus-based Studies with AntConc Service at the University. Yazyk i Kul'tura, 52, 36–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.17223/19996195/52/3
  • Shachkova, I. Iu. (2008). Semantika «kliuchevykh slov epokhi»: epokha T. Blera, 1997–2007. Nizhnii Novgorod, 208.
  • Korsakov, I. A., Korsakova, N. K. (1984). Naedine s pamiatiu. Moscow: Znanie, 80.
  • Matore, G. (1973). La Methode en Lexicologie. Domaine Francais. Paris: M. Didier, 126.
  • Fomina, Z. E. (1995). Slova-khronofakty v iazyke politicheskikh tekstov. Iazyk i emotcii. Volgograd: Peremena, 207–215.
  • Zemskaia, E. A. (1996). Aktivnye protcessy sovremennogo slovoproizvodstva. Russkii iazyk kontca XX stoletiia, 2 (1), 302–307.
  • Popova, L. A. (2021). Kliuchevye slova sovremennosti kak lingvisticheskii fenomen. Ufa, 217.
  • Kolesov, S. G. (2012). Teoriia E. Eriksona osnovnykh stadii zhiznennogo puti lichnosti i formirovanie zakonoposlushnogo povedeniia. Aktualnye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, 4, 272–275.
  • Polikarpov, A. A. (1998). Tciklicheskie protcessy v stanovlenii leksicheskoi sistemy iazyka: modelirovanie i eksperiment. Moscow.
  • Orlova, O. V. (2012). Diskursivno-stilisticheskaia evoliutciia mediakontcepta: zhiznennyi tcikl i miromodeliruiushchii potentcial. Tomsk, 423.
  • Shcheglova, E. A., Prokofeva, N. A. (2020). Mediaslovar kliuchevykh slov tekushchego momenta: leksiko-semanticheskaia gruppa «koronavirus». Novye slova i slovari novykh slov. Institut lingvisticheskikh issledovanii RAN, 190–202.
  • John, I. (2003). Semantics. Blackwell Pub, 720.
  • Alefirenko, N. F. (2006). Kognitivnaia semantika: mif ili realnost? Vestnik TGPU. Seriia: Gumanitarnye nauki (Filologiia), 5 (56), 43–48.
  • Vasko, R., Korolyova, A., Tolcheyeva, T., Kapranov, Y. (2020). Human Language as a Natural Artifact of Planetary-Noospheric Mind: Coevolutionary-Macromutational Reinterpretation. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 9 (34), 17–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2020.34.10.2
  • Vasko R., Korolyova A. (2020). Intertexutality of Julia Kristeva and hypothetical relationships of her theories with ancient types of writing. Reliģiski-filozofiski raksti. Latvijas Universitāte. Filozofijas un socioloģijas institūts.
  • Sternin, I. A, Rudakova, A. V. (2011). Psikholingvisticheskoe znachenie slova i ego opisanie. Teoreticheskie problemy. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic, 192.
  • Sternin, I. A. (2012). Problema needinstvennosti metaiazykovogo opisaniia mentalnykh edinitc v lingvistike. Lingvokontceptologiia i psikholingvistika, 5, 8–17.
  • Korpusno-eksperymentalna diahnostyka rezylentnosti predstavnykiv riznykh linhvokultur ta rozrobka povedinkovykh modeley yikh adaptatsiyi do kryzovykh yavyshch (2020). Available at: https://1drv.ms/w/s!ApCbMGU-a2logdRbmOd7HjwzjJ7Prw?e=PQmAQ5
  • Iartceva, V. N. (Ed.) (1990). Slóvo. LES – Lingvisticheskii entciklopedicheskii slovar Sovetskaia entciklopediia. Available at: http://tapemark.narod.ru/les/464c.html
  • Mustajoki, A., Walter, H., Vepreva, I. (2016). Word of the Year 2015. Quaestio Rossica, 4, 121–133. doi: https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2016.4.195
  • Kapranov, Y., Cherkhava, O., Gromova, V., Reshetnyk, O. (2021). Methodological procedure of diagnosing behavioural stereotypes resilience of different language cultures representatives. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 10(39), 186–193. doi: https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2021.39.03.18
  • Balla, M. I. (1996). Resilience. English-Ukrainian Dictionary. Osvita. Available at: https://128.slovaronline.com/56619-RESILIENCE
  • Cherniavskii, I. (2008). Kontceptciia zhiznestoikosti. Ekonomist, 5, 71–77.
  • Sheffi, I. (2006). Zhiznestoikoe predpriiatie. Kak povysit nadezhnost tcepochki postavok i sokhranit konkurentnoe preimushchestvo. Moscow: Alpina Biznes Buks, 301.
  • Ionesku, S. (2008). Kulturnaia soprotivliaemost. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniia, 3 (10), 74–76.
  • Leontev, D. A., Aleksandrova, L. A., Lebedeva, A. A. (2011). Spetcifika resursov i mekhanizmov psikhologicheskoi ustoichivosti studentov s OVZ v usloviiakh inkliuzivnogo obrazovaniia. Psikhologicheskaia nauka i obrazovanie, 3, 80–94.
  • Kapranov, Y. (2021). Viability Concept as Manifestation Form of Activity and Adaptability of Systems in Context of Philosophical Triad "Resource – Potential – Vitality". Problems of humanities: a collection of scientific works of Ivan Franko Drohobych State Pedagogical University. Series "Philology", 47, 82‒92. doi: https://doi.org/10.24919/2522-4565.2021.47.11
  • Aleksandrova, L. A. (2004). K kontceptcii zhiznestoikosti v psikhologii. Sibirskaia psikhologiia segodnia, 2, 82–90.
  • Velichkovskii, B. B. (2007). Mnogomernaia otcenka individualnoi ustoichivosti k stressu. Moscow, 196.
  • Velichkovskii, B. B. (2007). Mnogomernaia otcenka individualnoi ustoichivosti k stressu. Moscow, 196.
  • Iser, W. (1978). The Act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 239.
  • Filatov, V. M. (Ed.) (2004). Metodika obucheniia inostrannym iazykam v nachalnoi i osnovnoi obshcheobrazovatelnoi shkole. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo "Feniks", 416.
  • Gritcanov, A. A. (2002). Chtenie. Istoriia filosofii: Entciklopediia. Minsk: Knizhnyi Dom, 1177‒1180.
  • Barthes, R. (1986). From Work to Text. The rustle of language. New York: Hill and Wang, 56–64.
  • Eco, U. (1986). The role of the reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Text. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Izotova, N. P. (2018). Ihrova stylistyka romaniv Dzh. M. Kutzee: linhvopoetolohichni studii. Kyiv: Vyd. tsentr KNLU, 360.
  • Izotova, N. (2021). Ludic effects in fiction: A case study of J. M. Coetzee's Disgrace and its Russian and Ukrainian translations. SHS Web of Conferences, 105, 01006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110501006
  • Miedema, J. (2009). Slow reading. Duluth: Litwin Books, 92.
  • Mikics, D. (2013). Slow reading in a hurried age. Cambridge. Massachusetts: Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press, 333. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wpqhs
  • Newkirk, Th. (2012). The art of slow reading: six time-honored practices for engagement. Portsmouth: Heinemann, 224.
  • Shanskii, N. M. (1986). Khudozhestvennyi tekst pod lingvisticheskim mikroskopom. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 160.
  • Wilm, J. (2016). The Slow Philosophy of J. M. Coetzee. London: Bloomsbury, 251.
  • Potapenko, S. Izotova N. (2021). Cognitive Rhetoric of Effect: Responsibility Impression in Russian and Ukrainian Presidents' Inaugurals. Lege Artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow, I (2), 165–201. Available at: https://lartis.sk/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/PotapenkoIzotova.pdf
  • Lukin, V. A. (1999). Khudozhestvennyi tekst. Osnovy lingvisticheskoi teorii i elementy analiza. Moscow: Izdatelstvo "Os-89", 192.
  • Nonadditive. Merriam-Webster dictionary and Thesaurus. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nonadditive
  • Iriskhanova, O. K. (2013). O raspredelenii vnimaniia v narrativnykh tekstakh: analiz rasskaza Dzh. Apdaika "Daunghter, Last Glimpses of". Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Seriia. Iazykoznanie, 677, 18–36.
  • Kubriakova, E. S. (2012). V poiskakh sushchnosti iazyka: Kognitivnye issledovaniia. Moscow: Znak, 208.
  • Arnold, I. V. (2010). Semantika. Stilistika. Intertekstualnost. Moscow: Knizhnyi dom "LIBROKOM", 448.
  • Riffaterre, M. (1984). Semiotics of poetry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 223.
  • Moskalchuk, G. G. (2010). Struktura teksta kak sinergeticheskii protcess. Moscow: Editoial URSS, 296.
  • Coetzee, J. M. (2013). Dusklands. Lоndon: Vintage.
  • Coetzee, J. M. (2014). Diary of a Bad Year. New York: Penguin Books.
  • Coetzee, J. M. (2011). The Master of Petersburg. New York: Penguin Books.
  • Prigogine, I. (1989). The philosophy of instability. Futures, 21 (4), 396–400. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-3287(89)80009-6
  • Andreeva, O. A. (2000). Stabilnost i nestabilnost v kontekste sotciokulturnogo razvitiia. Taganrog: TIUiE, 232.
  • Instability. Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/instability
  • Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London; New York: Routledge.
  • Coetzee, J. M. (2014). Foe. New York: Penguin Books, 288.
  • Al-Majnouni, A. (2016). The theory of meta-narrative on J. M. Coetzee's Foe. Middletown, De., 108.
  • Coetzee, J. M. (2012). Elizabeth Costello. New York: Penguin Books.
  • Coetzee, J. M. (2010). Waiting for the Barbarians. New York: Penguin Books, 192.
  • Rothman, N. B., Pratt, M. G., Rees, L., Vogus, T. J. (2017). Understanding the Dual Nature of Ambivalence: Why and When Ambivalence Leads to Good and Bad Outcomes. Academy of Management Annals, 11 (1), 33–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0066
  • Coetzee, J. M. (2014). Youth. Scenes from Provincial Life. New York: Penguin Books, 141–284
  • Attridge, D. (2004). Coetzee and the ethics of reading: literature in the event. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 240.
  • Clarkson, С. (2017). J. M. Coetzee: Countervoices. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Vygotskii, L. S. (1986). Psikhologiia iskusstva. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 573.
  • Head, D. (2009). The Cambridge introduction to J. M. Coetzee. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511816901
  • Coetzee, J. M. (2014). Doubling the point: essays and interviews. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Lacuna. Merriam-Webster dictionary and Thesaurus. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lacuna
  • Gasparov, B. M. (1996). Iazyk, pamiat, obraz. Lingvistika iazykovogo sushchestvovaniia. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 495.
  • Doležel, L. (1998). Heterocosmica. Fiction and possible worlds, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 339.
  • Coetzee, J. M. (2012). Age of Iron. New York: Penguin Books.
  • Poyner, J. (2009). J. M. Coetzee and the paradox of postcolonial authorship. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Group, 214. doi: http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315590233
  • Aristotel (2002). Etika. Moscow: AST.
  • Kryzhanivskyi, O. P. (1996). Istoriia Starodavnoho Skhodu. Kyiv: Lybid, 480.
  • Tyshchenko, O. V. (2000). Obriadova semantyka u slov'ianskomu movnomu prostori. Kyivskyi derzhavnyi linhvistychnyi universytet, 236.
  • Gumboldt, V. fon. (1984). O razlichii stroeniia chelovecheskikh iazykov i ego vliianii na dukhovnoe razvitie chelovechestva. Izbrannye trudy po iazykoznaniiu. Moscow: Progress.
  • Uorf, B. L. (1960). Otnoshenie norm povedeniia i myshleniia k iazyku. Novoe v lingvistike, 1, 157–201. Available at: http://www.philology.ru/linguistics1/whorf-60.htm
  • Stefanova, N. O. (2020). Ethnosemiometric parametrisation of axioconceptosphere in the British and Ukrainian linguocultures. Kyiv. Available at: https://npu.edu.ua/images/file/vidil_aspirant/avtoref/D_26.053.26/Stefanova1.pdf
  • Melnychuk, O. S. (Ed.). (2012). Etymolohichnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy. Vol. 6: U–Ia. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. Available at: https://archive.org/details/etslukrmov6/mode/2up?view=theater
  • Benvinist, E.; Stepanova, Iu. S. (Ed.) (1974). Obshchaia lingvistika. Moscow: Progress.
  • Zalizniak, L. L. (2016). Mezolitychni vytoky pershykh indoievropeiskykh kultur Yevropy za danymy arkheolohii. Arkheolohiia, 3, 3-17.
  • Zalizniak, L. L. (2017). Etno-henetychni vytoky naidavnishykh indoievropeitsiv Yevropy. Ukraina y ukrainstvo v etnokulturnykh protsesakh. NDIU, 87–102. Available at: http://ndiu.org.ua/book/zbirn-etn-1.pdf
  • Oppert, J. (2018). Documents Juridiques de l'Assyrie Et de la Chaldée,. Forgotten Books,
  • Kozyreva, N. V. (2007). Istoriia drevnei mesopotamii. Saint-Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 128. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11701/10270
  • Kozyreva, N. V. (2016). Ocherki po istorii Iuzhnoi Mesopotamii epokhi rannei drevnosti (VII tys. do n.e. – seredina II tys. do n.e). Saint-Petersburg: Kontrast, 552. Available at: https://www.orient.spbu.ru/books/Kozyreva_ocherki_istorii_Mesopotamii
  • Mieroop, M. (2015). Van De A History of the Ancient Near East, ca. 3000-323 BC. Wiley Blackwell, 432.
  • Weeks, N. (1985). The Old Babylonian Amorites: Nomads or Mercenaries? Orientalia Lovaniensia Periodica, 16, 49–57.
  • Huehnergard, J. A. (2011). Grammar of Accadian. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/234695/2011_A_Grammar_of_Akkadian_3rd_edition_
  • Vaiman, A. A., Struve, V. V. (Eds.) (1961). Shumero-vavilonskaia matematika ІІІ-І tys. do n.e. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Vostochnoi literatury, 278.
  • Biggs, R. D. (1973). Pre-Sargonic Riddles from Lagash. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 32 (1/2), 26–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/372217
  • George, A. R. (2016). Mesopotamian incantations and related texts in the Schøyen Collection. CDL Press, 194. Available at: http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10888399
  • Krebernik, M.; Bauer, J., Englund, R. K., Krebernik, M. (Eds.) (1998). Die Texte aus Fara und Tell Abu-Salabih. Mesopotamien: Späturuk-Zeit und Frühdynastische Zeit. Universitätsverlag, 237–427. doi: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-151545
  • Kaneva, I. T., Kozlova, N. V., Vizirova, E. Iu.; Kazanskii, N. N., Kibrik, A. A., Koriakov, Iu. B. (Eds.) (2010). Shumerskii iazyk. Iazyki mira. Drevnie reliktovye iazyki Perednei Azii. Moscow: Akademiia, 19–94. Available at: https://djvu.online/file/BHzncTKmDA72j
  • Thomsen, M.-L. (2001). The Sumerian Language: An Introduction to its History and Grammatical Structure. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
  • Kaneva, I. T. (2006). Shumerskii iazyk. Saint-Petersburg: Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie, 240. Available at: https://pt.ua1lib.org/dl/3154702/8dbac4
  • Johnson, A., Johnson, J. C.; Englehardt, J. (Ed.) (2012). Contingency and Innovation in Native Transcriptions of Encrypted Cuneiform (UD.GAL.NUN). Agency in Ancient Writing. University Press of Colorado, 165–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607321996.c07
  • Kasian, A. S. (2015). Klinopisnye iazyki Anatolii (khattskii, khurrito-urartskie, anatoliiskie): problemy etimologii i grammatiki. Moscow, 445.
  • Turchin, P., Peiros, I., Gell-Mann, M. (2010). Analyzing genetic connections between languages by matching consonant classes. Journal of Language Relationship, 3, 117‒126.
  • Kapranov, Y. (2018). Hypothetical Versions on Antropogenesis Localization of the First Populations of the Homo. Logos, 94, 149–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.24101/logos.2018.15
  • Kapranov, Y. (2021). Dіakhronіchna іnterpretatcіia і verifіkatcіia stupenіv sporіdnennia nostratichnikh mov (na materіalі etimonіv *HuḲa, *wol[a], *wete, *phaħ- (~ *phǝħ-), *marV). Kyiv.
  • Korolyova, A. (2021). Transformation Stages of Biosphere into Noosphere: from Syncretic Consciousness of Homo to Co-Evolution of Man and Nature. Logos, 108, 92‒101. doi: https://doi.org/10.24101/logos.2021.58
  • Campbell, L., Poser, W. J. (2008). Language Classification: History and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 536.
  • Svodesh, M. (1960). K voprosu o povyshenii tochnosti v leksikostatisticheskom datirovanii. Novoe v lingvistike, 1, 53–87.
  • Diakonoff, I. M. (1988). Afrasian languages. Moscow: Nauka.
  • Sidwell, P. (2010). The Austroasiatic central riverine hypothesis. Journal of Language Relationship, 4, 117‒134.
  • Gamkrelidze, T. V., Ivanov, V. V. (1990). Istoriia proiskhozhdeniia indoevropeiskikh iazykov. V mire nauki, 5, 66–73.
  • Vaisgerber, L. (1993). Rodnoi iazyk i formirovanie dukha. Moscow: Izdatelskaia gruppa URSS, 232. Available at: https://www.studmed.ru/view/vaysgerber-yohan-leo-rodnoy-yazyk-i-formirovanie-duha_31142395c78.html
  • Boas, F. (1997). Granitcy sravnitelnogo metoda v antropologii. Antologiia issledovanii kultury. Vol. 1. Saint-Petersburg: Universitetskaia kniga, 509–518.
  • Boas, F. (1997). Metody etnologii. Antologiia issledovanii kultury. Vol. 1. Saint-Petersburg: Universitetskaia kniga, 519–527.
  • Boas, F. (1965). Vvedenie k «Rukovodstvu po iazykam amerikanskikh indeitcev». Istoriia iazykoznaniia XIX–XX vekov v ocherkakh i izvlecheniiakh. Chast II. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 170–180.
  • Sepir, E. (1993). Izbrannye trudy po iazykoznaniiu i kulturologii. Moscow: Progress, 656.
  • Sepir, E. (2003). Grammatist i ego iazyk. Iazyki kak obraz mira. Moscow: 139–157.
  • Whоrf, В. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Wharf. The MIT Press, 278.
  • Kniazeva, E. N. (Ed.) (2012). Evoliutcionnaia epistemologiia: Antologiia. Moscow; Saint-Petersburg: Tcentr gumanitarnykh initciativ, 704.
  • Rotenberg, V. S., Arshavskii, V. V. (1984). Mezhpolusharnaia asimmetriia mozga i problema integratcii kultur. Voprosy filosofii, 4, 78–86.
  • Lysenko, V. G., Rubetc, M. V. (2014). Atomizm i alfavitnyi printcip. Materialy "kruglogo stola". Voprosy filosofii, 6, 154–185.
  • Tolcheieva, T. S. (2006). Asotsiatyvna semantyka syhnifikatyvnykh artefaktiv-mifonimiv anhliiskoi movy. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova. Seriia 9. Suchasni tendentsii rozvytku mov, 1 (9), 271–278.
  • Svodesh, M. (1960). Leksikostatisticheskoe datirovanie doistoricheskikh etnicheskikh kontaktov (na materiale plemen eskimosov i severoamerikanskikh indeitcev). Novoe v lingvistike, 1, 23–52.
  • Uorf, B. (1960). Otnoshenie norm povedeniia i myshleniia k iazyku. Novoe v lingvistike, 1, 135–168.
  • Zvegintcev, V. A. (1960). Teoretiko-lingvisticheskie predposylki gipotezy Sepira-Uorfa. Novoe v lingvistike, 1, 111–134.
  • Borodai, S. Iu. (2013). Sovremennoe ponimanie problemy lingvisticheskoi otnositelnosti: raboty po prostranstvennoi kontceptualizatcii. Voprosy iazykoznaniia, 4, 17–54.
  • Lysak, M. S., Galchenko, A. A., Gavrish, O. V. (2020). Gipoteza Sepira – Uorfa: istoriia, sut i vliianie na nauku. Molodoi uchenyi, 40 (330), 239–242.
  • Lektorskii, V. A.; Lektorskii, V. A. (Ed.) (2015). Predislovie. Reliativizm kak bolezn sovremennoi filosofii. Moscow: Kanon+, 3–4.
  • Merkulov, I. P. (2005). Kognitivnye sposobnosti. Moscow: IF RAN, 182.
  • Gumperz, J., Levinson, S. (Eds.) (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 488.
  • Iung, K. G. (1988). Razlichie vostochnogo i zapadnogo myshleniia. Filosofskie nauki, 10, 63–82.
  • Levi-Briul, L.; Gippenreiter, Iu. B., Petukhova, V. V. (Eds.) (1980). Pervobytnoe myshlenie. Psikhologiia myshleniia. Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU, 130–140.
  • Eliade, M. (1996). Aspekty mifa. Moscow: Invest-PPP», ST«PPP», 240.
  • Ivanov, V. V. (1978). Chet i nechet: Asimmetriia mozga i znakovykh sistem. Moscow: Sovetskoe radio, 184.
  • Ivanov, V. V.. (2012). Istoriia vzleta i gibeli srednevekovykh ieroglificheskikh kultur. Institut Mirovoi kultury MGU.
  • Ivanov, V. V. (2014). Fonema i pismo v drevnei kulture i ikh sviaz s atomizmom (Atomizm i alfavitnyi printcip: materialy «kruglogo stola»), Voprosy filosofii, 6, 29–38.
  • Kobzev, A. I. (1994). Uchenie o simvolakh i chislakh v kitaiskoi klassicheskoi filosofii. Moscow: Nauka, 432.
  • Kobzev, A. I. (2014). Vystuplenie na Kruglom stole «Atomizm i alfavitnyi printcip». Voprosy filosofii, 6, 154–184
  • Zdenek, M. (2004). Razvitie pravogo polushariia. Minsk: Popurri, 126.
  • Lippman, W. (1950). Public Opinion. Macmillan.
  • Bartminski, J. (2012). Aspects of Cognitive Ethnolinguistics. Equinoxб 256.
  • Tcivian, T. V. (2009). Model mira i ee lingvisticheskie osnovy. Moscow: Librokom, 278.
  • Grigoryev, D., Fiske, S. T., Batkhina, A. (2019). Mapping Ethnic Stereotypes and Their Antecedents in Russia: The Stereotype Content Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01643
  • Shutova, M., Mudrynych, S. (2020). The Concept of "New Life" as a Powerful Psycholinguistic Element in the Inaugural Addresses of the U.S. Presidents. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 9 (33), 8–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2020.33.09.1
  • Croizet, J. C. (2001). Stereotype Threat, Social Class, Gender, and Academic UnderAchievement: When Our Reputation Catches Up to Us and Takes Over. Social Psycology of Education, 4 (3), 295–310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011336821053
  • Schmalor, A., Cheung, B. Y., Heine, S. J. (2021). Exploring people's thoughts about the causes of ethnic stereotypes. PLOS ONE, 16 (1), e0245517. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245517
  • Apresian, Iu. D. (1995). Izbrannye trudy. Shkola "Iazyki russkoi kultury".
  • Hnapovska, L. V.(2011). Tekst imeni v teksti kultury: antroponimichni etiudy. Naukovyi visnyk kafedry YuNESKO KNLU. Seriia Filolohiia. Pedahohika. Psykholohiia, 22, 10–19.
  • Mikes, G. (1946/1973). How to Be an Alien. A Handbook for Beginners and More Advanced Pupils. Wingate. Available at: http://f2.org/humour/howalien.html
  • Klein's Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. (1966). Elsevier publishing company, 844.
  • Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Mouton de Gruyter. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112329764
  • Orwell, G. (1947) The English People. Collins.
  • Clark, J. C. D. (2000). Protestantism, Nationalism, and National Identity, 1660–1832. The Historical Journal, 43 (1), 249–276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x99008997
  • Wolf, F. (2001). The Emergence of National Identity in Early Modern England. Causes and Ideological Representations. Writing the Early Modern English Nation. Brill, 149–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004489332_009
  • Karasik, V. I. (2000). O tipakh diskursa. Iazykovaia lichnost: institutcionalnyi i personalnyi diskurs. Volgograd: Peremena, 5–20.
  • Fox, K. (2004). Watching the English. The Hidden Rules of English Behaviour. Hodder and Soughton Ltd.
  • Cowie, A. P., Mackin, R., McCaig, I. R. (1996). ODEI – Oxford Dictionary of English Idioms. Oxford University Press.
  • Zindler, F. R. Spirit, Soul and Mind. Aable at: http://www.positief-atheisme.nl/atheisten/frank_r_zindler/spirit_soul_and_mind.html
  • Chyzhevskyi, D. (1992). Narysy z istorii filosofii na Ukraini. Kyiv: Orii, 230.
  • Bilonozhenko, V. (1993). Frazeolohichnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy. Naukova dumka, 980.
  • Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (2014). Pearson, 493.
  • Harper, D. Online Etymology Dictionary. Available at: http://www.etymonline.com/
  • Bilodid, I., Kolomiiets V. (1982–2012). Etymolohichnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
  • Machek, V. (1957). Etymologický slovník jazyka českého a slovenského. Čsav, 865.
  • Chambers Dictionary of Idioms (1996). Chambers.
  • Nomys, M. (2004). Ukrainski prykazky, prysliv'ia, i take inshe. Kyiv: Lybid, 352.
  • Kulchytskyi, O. (1995). Osnovy filosofii i filosofichnykh nauk. Lviv: Ukrainskyi vilnyi universytet.
  • Herman, D.; Kindt, T., Muller, H.-H. (Eds.) (2003). Regrounding Narratology: The Study of Narratively Organized System of Thinking. What is Narratology: Questions and Answers Regarding the Status of a Theory. Walter de Gruyter, 303–332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110202069.303
  • Kindt, T. (2008). L'auteur implicite. Remarque à propos de l'évolution de la critique d'une notion entre narratologie et théorie de l'interprétation. Vox Poetica. Available at: https://vox-poetica.com/t/articles/kindt.html
  • Pier, J., Berthelot, F. (Eds.) (2010). Narratologies contemporaines: approches nouvelles pour la théorie et l'analyse de récit. Paris: Editions des Archives Contemporaines, 274.
  • Ryan, M.-L.; Hühn, P., Pier, J., Schmid, W., Schönert, J. (Eds.) (2009). Space. Handbook of Narratology. Walter de Gruyter, 420–433.
  • Schaeffer, J.-M.; Pier, J., Berthelot, F. (Eds.) (2010). Le traitement cognitif de la narration. Narratologies contemporaines: approches nouvelles pour la théorie et l'analyse de récit. Éditions des archives contemporaines, 215–232.
  • McAdams, D. (2006). Le Soi Rédempteur. Available at: https://stringfixer.com/fr/Narrative_identity
  • Bekhta, I. A. (2010). Opovidnyi dyskurs v anhlomovnii khudozhnii prozi: typolohiia ta dynamika movlennievykh form. Kyiv.
  • Bertrand, M. (2005). Qu'est-ce que la subjectivation? Le Carnet PSY, 1 (96), 24–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.3917/lcp.096.0024
  • Moklytsia, M. V. (1999). Modernizm yak struktura. Filosofiia. Psykholohiia. Poetyka. Lutsk.
  • McAdams, D. P. (2018). Narrative Identity: What Is It? What Does It Do? How Do You Measure It? Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 37 (3), 359–372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236618756704
  • Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
  • Macé, M. (2013). Identité narrative ou identité stylistique? Fabula. Available at: http://www.fabula.org/colloques/document1920.php
  • Ricœur, P. (1990). Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 424.
  • Berger, D., McAdams, D. (1999). La cohérence du récit de vie et sa relation avec le bien-être psychologique. Enquête narrative, 9, 69–96.
  • Genette, G. (1972). Figures III. Paris: Seuil, 286.
  • Nizzi, M.-Ch. (2011). Le Propre et l'Étranger: le concept d'identité vécue en première personne. Philosophie. HAL. Available at: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00598343
  • Locke, J. (2009). Essai sur l'entendement humain. Les classiques de la Philosophiem 1120.
  • Foisneau, L. (2004). Identité personnelle et mortalité humaine Hobbes, Locke, Leibniz. Archives de Philosophie, 67 (1), 65–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.3917/aphi.671.0065
  • Montaigne, M. (1992). Essais, II. Villey. PUF, Quadrige.
  • Giocanti, S. (2017). Peut-on se passer de la notion d'identité ? La contribution de Montaigne. Essais, 11, 29–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/essais.3294
  • Peetz, Ch. (2018). Le concept d'identité chez J. Locke et chez P. Ricœur : la mémoire au fondement de l'identité? Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/thesis:16242
  • Herlant-Hémar, K. Identité et inscription temporelle : le récit de soi chez Ricœur. Available at: https://docplayer.fr/12189560-Identite-et-inscription-temporelle-le-recit-de-soi-chez-ricoeur.html
  • Artemenko, A. P. (2012). Funktsionalnist identychnosti. Humanitarnyi chasopys, 2, 13–19.
  • Kheirallah, H. (2012). Fredric Jameson: refashioning literature definition. GRIN Verlag, 21. Available at: https://www.grin.com/document/207140
  • Bruner, J. (1997). A Narrative Model of Self-Construction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 818 (1), 145–161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48253.x
  • Ilina, A. V., Podolska, T. V. (2012). Naratyvna identychnist u prostori komunikatyvno-dyskursyvnykh praktyk. Filosofiia. Kyiv, 750.
  • Lehkyi, M. Z. (1996). Maister maloi prozy. Dzvin, 8, 131–136.
  • Jung-Rozenfarb, M. (2008). Les récits du Moi ou l'art de la transposition autour de l'écriture d'Hélène Cixous. Revue française de psychanalyse, 5, 1699–1705. doi: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfp.725.1699
  • Toro, Alfonso de. (2004). La «nouvelle autobiographie» postmoderne ou l'impossibilité d'une histoire à la première personne : Robbe-Grillet, Le Miroir qui Revient et de Doubrovsky, Le Livre Brisé. Available at: https://home.uni-leipzig.de/detoro/wp-content/uploads/2004/03/2004-La-nouvelle-autobiographie.pdf
  • Palii, O. P. (2005). Romany Milana Kundery: problematyka, poetyka, naratyvni stratehii. Kyiv.
  • Breton, A. (1964). Nadja. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
  • Breton, A. (1960). Nadja. New York: Grove Press, Inc., 160.
  • Domoratckaia, E. S. (2002). Andre Breton i formirovanie poetiki frantcuzskogo siurrealizma v 20-e – nachale 30-kh godov XX veka. Saint Petersburg, 192.
  • Andreev, L. G. (1972). Siurrealizm. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola, 230.
  • Collins English Dictionary. Available at: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english
  • Lutcak, S. M. (2002). Vnutrіshnia organіzatcіia prozovogo tekstu (na materіalі khudozhnіkh tvorіv Іvana Franka). Ivano-Frankivsk, 210.
  • Savchuk, R. (2019). L'intermédialité du texte littéraire: vers une nouvelle méthodologie de recherche interdisciplinaire. Langue, Sciences et Pratiques. Odessa.
  • Grebeniuk, T. V. (2010). Podіia v khudozhnіi sistemі lіteraturnogo tvoru (na materіalі ukrainskoi prozi kіntcia XX – pochatku XXІ stolіttia). Kyiv.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11, 11–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
  • Chernenko, О.V. (2019). Pragmatic peculiarities of the final phase of conflict interaction in fiction discourse. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow, IV (2), 2–48. Available at: https://lartis.sk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Chernenko_Issue-2_2019.pdf
  • Fairclough, I., Fairclough, N. (2012). Poilitical discourse analysis. A method for advanced students. London: Routledge, 280.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). The Mass Media Today: Discourses of Domination or Diversity? Javnost – The Public, 2 (2), 27–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.1995.11008592
  • Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing political discourse. Theory and practice. London, New York: Routledge.
  • Andone, C.; Fetzer, A. (Ed.) (2013). Strategic maneuvering in a political interview: The case of responding to an accusation of inconsistency. The pragmatics of political discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 103–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.228.07and
  • Anchimbe, E. A.; Fetzer, A. (Ed.) (2013). Motions of support and the communicative act of thanking. The pragmatics of political discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 219–242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.228.12anc
  • Fetzer, A.: Schneider, K. P., Barron, A. (Eds.) (2014). Conceptualising discourse. Pragmatics of discourse. De Gruyter Mouton, 35–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214406-003
  • Livnat, Z., Dori-Hacohen, G.; Fetzer, A. (Ed.) (2013). The effect of irony in radio talk-back programmes in Israel. The pragmatics of political discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 193–217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.228.11liv
  • Mertz, E., Yovel, J. (2009). Metalinguistic awareness. Cognition and Pragmatics. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 250–271. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.3.13mer
  • Sheigal, E. I. (2004). Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa. Moscow: Gnozis, 324.
  • Zelenskyi, V. (2022). Zvernennia Prezydenta Ukrainy Volodymyra Zelenskoho do parlamentu Velykoi Brytanii. Available at: https://www.president.gov.ua/news/zvernennya-prezidenta-ukrayini-volodimira-zelenskogo-do-parl-73441
  • Johnson, B. (2022). Prime Minister Boris Johnson's address to the Ukrainian Parliament. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/prime-minister-boris-johnsons-address-to-the-ukrainian-parliament-3-may-2022
  • Hnezdilova, Ya. V. (2021). Kohnityvno-dyskursyvni modeli anhlomovnoi manipuliatyvnoi metakomunikatsii. Kyiv, 502.
  • Lykina, V. V. (2021). Cognitive rhetorical models of democracy concept embodiment in president Biden's speeches. "Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University", Series: "Philology. Journalism," 32 (3 (71)), 169–174. doi: https://doi.org/10.32838/2710-4656/2021.3-1/29
  • Potapenko, S. (2021). Kognitivnaia media-ritorika: bytovanie konflikta-krizisa v angloiazychnykh internet-novostiakh. Kyiv: Izdatelskii tcentr KNLU, 299.
  • Hopkinson, Ch., Tomášková, R., Blažková, B. (2011). Power and persuasion: Interpersonal discourse strategies in the public domain. University of Ostrava.
  • Sivenkova, M.; Fetzer, A. (Ed.) (2013). On the metapragmatics of British, German and Russian political questions and answers. The pragmatics of political discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 21–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.228.03siv
  • Verschueren, J. (2022). Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics, 10 (4), 439–456. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.4.02ver
  • Brocas, I., Carrillo, J. D. (2005). A Theory of Influence: The Strategic Value of Public Ignorance. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.660401
  • Sullivan, D., Schmitt, H. J., Goad, A. N. (2022). The sociomaterial force theory of identity. Theory & Psychology, 32 (3), 353–374. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221082948
  • Golodnov, A. V. (2011). Ritoricheskii metadiskurs: osnovaniia pragmalingvisticheskogo modelirovaniia i sotciokulturnoi realizatcii (na materiale sovremennogo nemetckogo iazyka). Saint Petersburg: Asterion, 345.
  • Hübler, A., Busse, U.; Busse, U., Hübler, A. (Eds.) (2012). Introduction. In Investigations into the meta-communicative lexicon of English. A contribution to historical pragmatics. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.220.02hub
  • Goffman, E. (1983). Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press, 335.
  • Săftoiu, R.; Fetzer, A. (Ed.) (2013). The discursive practice of addressing in the Romanian parliament. The pragmatics of political discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 47–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.228.04saf
  • Sandvik, M.; Fetzer, A. (Ed.) (2013). Argumentation in broadcast election campaign discourse: Towards a rhetorical reconstruction. The pragmatics of political discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 69–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.228.06san
  • Riccioni, I., Bongelli, R., Zuczkowski, A.; Fetzer, A. (Ed.) (2013). The communication of certainty and uncertainty in Italian political media discourses. The pragmatics of political discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 125–165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.228.08ric
  • Dunmire, P. L.; Johnstone, B., Eisenhart, C. (Eds.) (2008). The rhetoric of temporality. The future as linguistic construct and rhetorical resource. Rhetoric in detail. Discourse analysis of rhetoric talk and text. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 81–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.31.07dun
  • Harris, R. A. (1980). A handbook of rhetorical devices. Available at: http://www.hellesdon.org/documents/Advanced%20Rhetoric.pdf
  • Gnezdilova, Y. (2017). Autonomous metacommunicative lexicon and its specifics in manipulative discourse. Lege Artis, 2 (1), 42–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/lart-2017-0002
  • Babeliuk, O. A. (2016). Pereklad postmodernistskoho khudozhnoho tekstu: balansuvannia mizh vyznachenistiu i nevyznachenistiu. Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskoho universytetu, 11-12 (1), 20–24.
  • Mankovskaia, N. (2009). Fenomen postmodernizma. Moscow-Saint Petersburg: Tcentr gumanitarnykh initciativ: Universitetskaia kniga, 495.
  • Koliasa, O. V. (2015). Adhoc poetic thinking as cognitive semantic mechanism of ludic absurd creation in postmodern fantasy story. Young Scientist, 2, 383–387.
  • Babelyuk, O., Koliasa, O., Smaglii, V. (2021). Language Means of Revealing Postmodern Ludic Absurd in English Literary Text. WISDOM, 20 (4), 166–179. doi: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v20i4.531
  • Wood, J. (2010). How Fiction Works. London: Vintage Digital, 208.
  • Eco, U. (1990). The Limits of Interpretation. Indiana University Press, 295.
  • Barth, J. (1980). The literature of Replenishment. Athlantic Monthly, 65–71.
  • Tejera, V. (1988). Semiotics: From Peirce to Barthes. A conceptual introduction to the study of communication, interpretation and expression. Brill.
  • Babeliuk, O. A. (2014). Postmodernistskyi ironichnyi styl pysma: semiolohichni faktory tekstotvorennia. Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskoho universytetu, 708-709, 14–18.
  • Babeliuk, O., Badiuk, O. (2021). Author's postmodern irony in English literary text. Philological Periodical of Lviv, 9, 15–20.
  • Waugh, P. (1984). Metafiction: The theory and practice of self-conscious fiction. Routledge, 186.
  • Ryan, D. (2014). The spinning heart. Doubleday.
  • Schweitzer, E. (2007). The Atlantis irony: Plato's humorous legacy. ENTA.
  • Yus, F. (2018). Attaching Feelings and Emotions to Propositions. Some Insights on Irony and Internet Communication Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22 (1), 94–107. doi: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-94-107
  • Chambers, H. (2007). Humor and irony in nineteenth-century German women's writing: Studies in prose fiction, 1840–1900. Rochester: Camden House, 256.
  • Dynel, M. (2018). Irony, deception and humour: Seeking the truth about overt and covert untruthfulness. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501507922
  • Hutcheon, L. (2004). Irony's Edge: The theory and politics of irony. London: Routledge, 264. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203359259
  • Hoffmann, L. (2016). Postirony: The nonfictional literature of David foster Wallace and Dave Eggers. Transcript Verlag. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839436615
  • Kuzmenko, T. M. (2013). Sutnisni kharakterystyky ta klasyfikatsiia sotsialnykh hrup: referentna hrupa: vydy ta funktsii. Aktualni problemy sotsiolohii, psykholohii, pedahohiky, 18, 64–77.
  • Lovochkina, A. M., Stokolos, H. M. (2017). Sotsialno-psykholohichni problemy orhanizatsii volonterskoi diialnosti. Orhanizatsiina psykholohiia. Ekonomichna psykholohiia, 1, 45–52.
  • Kovtunovich, M. G. (2004). Assotciativnyi eksperiment kak metod vyiavleniia stroeniia struktur dolgovremennoi semanticheskoi pamiati. Psikhologiia vysshikh kognitivnykh protcessov, 143–162.
  • Zahorodnya, O. F. (2018). Associative fields of social and political lexis in the Ukrainian language world view (computer processing of the psycholinguistic experiment results). Kyiv.
  • Vasko, R. (2021). The Idea of Harmonising Hypotheses about the Origin of Life on Earth: The Rational Principle – Human Being and His Language. Logos, 106, 80–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.24101/logos.2021.09
  • Liashko, O., Kapranov, Y., Cherkhava, O., Nasalevych, T., Riabukha, T. (2021). Methodological algorithm for interpreting intertextuality within the orthodox sermon (case study of the english orthodox sermon fragment). Revista Amazonia Investiga, 10 (43), 123–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2021.43.07.12
  • Lazer-Pankiv, O., Korolova, N., Stefanova, N. (2021). Functional, Semantic and Linguistic Features of Latin Text on Vanitas Works of Fine Art. WISDOM, 19 (3), 228‒242. doi: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v19i3.527
  • Stefanova, N., Khrypko, S., Matveev, V., Nykytchenko, O., Ishchuk, A., Pasko, K. (2021). Cybercrime as a Discourse of Interpretations: the Semantics of Speech Silence vs Psychological Motivation for Actual Trouble. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21 (8), 203‒211. doi: https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.8.27
  • Dilts, R. (2011). Success factor modeling. Conscious leadership and resilience: Orchestrating innovation and fitness for the future. Crown House Publishing.
  • Antipina, G. S. (1982). Teoretiko-metodologicheskie problemy issledovaniia malykh sotcialnykh grupp. Leningrad: Izdatelstvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 112.
  • Goroshko, E. I. (2005). Problema provedeniia svobodnogo assotciativnogo eksperimenta. Izvestiia Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta "Filologicheskie nauki", 3, 53–61.
  • Gottsdanker, R. (1982). Osnovy psikhologicheskogo eksperimenta. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo universiteta. Available at: http://flogiston.ru/library/gottsdanker
  • Denysevych, O. (2010). Vilnyi asotsiatyvnyi eksperyment yak zasib doslidzhennia sotsialnoho portretu. Zhytomyr: Vydavnytstvo ZhDU imeni Ivana Franka, 193.
  • Kazmirenko, L. I., Kudermina, O. I., Moisieieva, O. Ye.; Kazmirenko, L. I. (Ed.) (2015). Psykholohiia. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav, 213.
  • Apresian, Iu. D. (2009). Issledovaniia po semantike i leksikografii. Vol. I: Paradigmatika. Iazyki slavianskikh kultur, 568.
  • Bodrov, V. A. (2006). Psikhologicheskii stress: razvitie i preodolenie. Moscow: PER SE, 528.
  • Gorodetckaia, L. A. (2002). Assotciativnyi eksperiment v kommunikativnykh issledovaniiakh. Teoriia kommunikatcii i prikladnaia kommunikatciia. Vestnik Rossiiskoi kommunikativnoi assotciatcii, 1, 28–37.
  • Bodnar, A. Ya., Makarenko, N. H. (2013). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti stresostiikosti predstavnykiv stresohennykh profesii (na prykladi pratsivnykiv pryvatnykh okhoronnykh struktur). Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu "KyievoMohylianska akademiia". Pedahohichni, psykholohichni nauky ta sotsialni nauky, 149, 49–56.