Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published December 31, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Teacher Qualifications, Students' Multi-Variant and Teaching Strategies Variables as Determinants of Mathematics Students' Cognitive Achievement

  • 1. Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Adeyemi University of Education, Ondo

Description

The study investigated the extent to which some multi-variant variables such as self-efficacy, mathematics anxiety, students’ perception, self-concept, and teaching techniques determined the cognitive achievement of senior secondary school mathematics students. A non-randomized pre-test. a post-test control group with a 3x3x2x2 factorial arrangement on the quasi-experiential design was adopted. The participants for the study involved 140 senior secondary two mathematics students and a multistage sampling technique was adopted. Two researcher-made instruments were used for data collection. These were the Mathematics Achievement Test (MAT) and School Multivariant Variable Questionnaire (SMVQ). MAT consists of 50 multiple-choice items while SMVQ was divided into four sections namely self-efficacy, mathematics anxiety scale, self-concept perceptions, and student’s ability in mathematics. The internal consistencies of 0.88, 0.86, 0.92, 0.85, and 0.88 respectively were achieved using the Kuder-Richardson formula 21, and Cronbach Alpha was used to gather data for the study. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was used to analyse the data collected. The results revealed that teaching, teaching technique with an index of the relationship of 0.44 (0.52) has the most facilitating effect in the enhancement of students’ cognitive achievement in the concept of Algebra in mathematics. This is seconded by teachers’ qualification with an index of the relationship of 0.14 (0.402), while the multi-variant variable with an index of the relationship of 0.0014 (0.042) has the least facilitative effects. The result also indicated that there is no significant interaction effect of teaching strategies (discussion and guided discovery) are equally good for the students.

Files

Article 772 Soft-Copy.pdf

Files (865.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:55b1fc05ce0e0aade93fab3dd43ed2fe
865.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Adedayo, D. A. (2009). Self-efficacy and subject enrolment in secondary schools. An empirical inquiry Ibadan. Journal of Educational studies, 1(1), 92-95.
  • Ajayi, A. (2012). Parent involvement interest in school environment as predictors of academic self-efficacy amongfresh secondary school students in Oyo State. Review of educational research, 40, 510-515.
  • Akinbobola A. O. (2006). Effects of teaching method and study habits on students' achievement in seniorsecondary physics using a pictorial organizer {unpublished Ph.D thesis}, University of Uyo.
  • Akinsola, M.K. (2000). Teacher's perception of Communication and language skill in mathematics teaching andlearning situations. African Journal of Educational Research, 6(1 & 2) 100-114.
  • Asaguara, C. G.,& George I. N. (2003).School adjective and academic success. Calabar Bon University limited.
  • Hurlock, E.B. (2007). Personality Development. M. C Graw HillBook. New York 326-327
  • Jegede, S. A. (2003) Effects of the component task analysis model of instruction on students' performance in chemistry. {Unpublished doctoral thesis}, University of Ado Ekiti, Nigeria.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (2004). Objectivism verses constructivism do we need a new philosophy paradigm? Educationaltechnology. Research and Development, 3a, 5-14.
  • Popoola, A. A. (2008) Strategies for improving the teaching of mathematics in secondary school mathematics. Science Teachers Association of Nigeria. Proceeding of Annual National Conference.
  • Spence, D. J. (2004). Engagement with mathematics course were in traditional and online learning environmentrelationship to motivation, achievement, gender and gender orientation, {Unpublished doctoral dissertation}, Emory University USA.
  • Tarto, O. A. (2000). The Hamilton anxiety scale: Reliability validity and sensitivity and depressive disorders.Review of Educational Research, 64, 55-60.

Subjects

Social Science and Humanities Research
http://www.gphjournal.org/index.php/ssh/article/view/772