Published February 7, 2023 | Version v1
Other Open

Permafrost response to temperature rise in carbon and nutrient cycling: Effects from habitat-specific conditions and factors of warming

  • 1. Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences
  • 2. Guangdong Academy of Sciences
  • 3. Chinese Academy of Sciences

Description

Permafrost is warming at a rate of two times faster than the rest of the Earth's surface. However, there is still a lack of a quantitative basis for predicting the functional stability of permafrost ecosystems in carbon (C) and nutrient cycling. We compiled the data of 708 observations from 89 air-warming experiments in the Northern Hemisphere and characterized the general effects of temperature increase on permafrost C exchange and balance, biomass production, microbial biomass, soil nutrients, and vegetation N dynamics via a meta-analysis. Also, an investigation was made on how responses may change with habitat-specific (e.g., plant functional groups and soil moisture status) conditions and warming variables (e.g., warming phases, levels, and timing). Warming downregulated net ecosystem C exchange generally via stimulating ecosystem respiration (15.6%) more than photosynthesis (6.2%). Vegetation usually responded to warming by investing more the C to the belowground, as belowground biomass increased much more (30.1%) than aboveground biomass (2.9%). Warming had a minor effect on microbial biomass. Warming increased soil ammonium and nitrate concentrations. What's more, a synthesis of 70 observations from 11 herbs and 9 shrubs revealed a 2.5% decline of N in green leaves. Compared to herbs, shrubs demonstrated a stronger response in respiration and had green leaf N declined by a greater extent. Not only in dry conditions did green leaf N decline with warming but also in wet conditions. Warming in non-growing seasons would negatively affect soil water, C uptake, and biomass production during growing seasons. Permafrost C loss and vegetation N decline may increase with warming levels and timing. Overall, our findings suggest that besides a positive C cycling-climate feedback, there will be negative feedback between permafrost nutrient cycling and climate warming.

Notes

Funding provided by: National Natural Science Foundation of China
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809
Award Number: 32001209

Files

Fig_S1_Relationships_between_rainfall_and_C_flux.TIF

Files (419.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e652d9428a5ab8c16ffb7731547ab880
52.0 kB Preview Download
md5:cc6e8c22a6c561389d7d178fddcde272
26.0 kB Preview Download
md5:3713b8e5a024b8d801aa4b614a82e20f
17.9 kB Download
md5:85ef28fd5a733668e5b47a2bed729b97
305.0 kB Download
md5:7b5282db60dacea81b61752938a62bae
18.4 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is derived from
10.5061/dryad.jdfn2z3c1 (DOI)