Published January 4, 2023 | Version v2
Journal article Open

Factors Affecting Physicians' Responses to Patient Demands, Stress Perceptions and Coping Styles

  • 1. Department of Medical History and Deontology, Gulhane Medical Faculty, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • 2. Department of Family Medicine, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • 3. Department of General Surgery, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.

Description

Abstract

Physicians are trying to cope with patients’ potentially inappropriate demands in addition to their intensive work environments. The objectives of this study were to determine physicians’ points of view regarding patient demands, such as requests for inappropriate medical tests, prescription medications, or disability, and to what extent these demands affect physicians. This survey study was completed by conducting face-to-face interviews with the physicians, to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of the 196 physicians working in our institution toward patient demands. Physicians reported that disability-related requests were the most prevalent patient demand (71.4%; n=140). A total of 2.6% (n=5) of the physicians performed laboratory tests that they considered unsuitable, 4.1% (n=8) described inappropriate prescription medication requests, and 2.6% (n=5) reported receiving disability requests from patients that they considered to be inappropriate. It was found that knowing patients formerly or being their health workers significantly altered physician behavior and increased rates of meeting inappropriate demand (strong correlation; r=0.809, p<0.001). The average score of the physicians showing their knowledge of the non-compliance of the patient requests was 60.99±10.46 (min-max 30-87.5 points), while the average score of the physicians' attitudes towards the demands they considered inappropriate was 44.73±10.23 (min-max 15-72.5 points). Knowledge and attitude scores were statistically higher in those working time under 10 years, as knowledge scores were statistically higher in those working in the internal medicine branches. In terms of behavior scores, there was no significant difference between working times and branches. In our study, the personality type of the physician was not significant in terms of meeting the patient demand. The job satisfaction of the physicians had no effect on the physician's informed, attitude, and behavior. In terms of stress coping style, the lack of difference in the sub-size of the scale of the subjugation approach was considered to be remarkable. As a consequence, acting for the benefit of the patient in clinical decision making is necessary. It is important to remember that any unnecessary examinations, prescribed medications, or disability requests lead to additional costs, loss of labor, and added workload in addition to posing a health risk for the patient.

Özet

Hekimler, yoğun çalışma koşullarının yanı sıra hastaların potansiyel olarak uygun olmayan talepleriyle de baş etmeye çalışmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, hastaların uygun olmayan tıbbi test, reçeteli ilaç, istirahat raporu gibi taleplerine hekimlerin bakış açısını ve bu taleplerin hekimleri ne ölçüde etkilediğini değerlendirmektir. Kurumumuzda çalışmakta olan 196 hekimin hasta talepleri karşısındaki bilgi, tutum ve davranışlarını belirlemek amacıyla yapılan bu anket çalışması hekimlerle yüz yüze görüşülerek tamamlandı. Hekimler tarafından bildirilen en yaygın (%71.4; n=140) uygun olmayan hasta talebinin istirahat raporu istekleri olduğu belirlendi. Hekimlerin %2.6'sı (n=5) uygun bulmadıkları laboratuvar test istemlerini, %4.1’i (n=8) uygun olmayan reçeteli ilaç taleplerini ve %2.6’sı (n=5) hastalardan gelen uygun görmediklerini istirahat raporu isteklerini karşıladıklarını bildirdiler. Hastaları daha önceden tanıyor olmanın veya hastaların sağlık çalışanı olmasının hekim davranışını önemli ölçüde değiştirdiği ve uygunsuz talepleri karşılama oranlarını artırdığı saptandı (güçlü korelasyon; r=0.809, p<0.001). Hasta isteklerine uymama konusunda bilgi sahibi olduğu görülen hekimlerin puan ortalaması 60.99±10.46 (min-maks 30-87.5 puan) iken, hekimlerin uygun bulmadıkları taleplere yönelik tutum puan ortalaması 44.73±10.23 (minimum-maksimum 15-72.5 puan) olarak bulundu. Bilgi ve tutum puanları 10 yıldan daha kısa süredir çalışan hekimlerde istatistiksel olarak daha yüksekti, benzer şekilde bilgi puanları dahili branşlarda görev yapan hekimlerde anlamlı derecede daha yüksekti. Davranış puanları açısından çalışma süreleri ve branşlar arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı. Çalışmamızda hekimin kişilik tipi hasta talebini karşılama açısından anlamlı bir farklılığa sahip değildi. Hekimlerin iş doyumunun bilgi, tutum ve davranışları üzerinde herhangi bir etkisi olmadığı sonucuna varıldı. Stresle başa çıkma tarzı açısından boyun eğici davranışlar ölçeği alt boyutunda farklılık olmaması dikkat çekici bulunmuştur. Netice itibariyle, klinik karar vermede hastanın yararına hareket etmek gerekmekte, gereksiz muayenelerin, reçete edilen ilaçların veya istirahat raporu taleplerinin hasta için sağlık riski oluşturmasının yanı sıra ek maliyetlere, iş gücü kaybına ve ek iş yüküne yol açtığını unutmamak ayrıca önem arz etmektedir.

Notes

Hekimlerin Hasta Taleplerine Yanıtlarını, Stres Algılarını ve Başa Çıkma Tarzlarını Etkileyen Faktörler

Files

lms.2023.24.v2.pdf

Files (730.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:193a797ffbd032042ea4ebafb153afbb
730.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • ‎1. Çakıt MO, Arslan I, Sarı O, Çelik M. Hasta ile uyum/Anlaşma. In: Saatçi E (ed), Rakel Aile Hekimliği. 2019, Güneş Tıp ‎Kitabevleri, Ayrıntı Basım Yayın ve Matbaacılık, Ankara. pp: 141-56.‎
  • ‎2. Oğuz NY. Physician-Patient Relationship in Clinical Practice. T Klin J Med Ethics 1995; 3(2): 59-65. ‎
  • ‎3. Glasziou P. Why is evidence-based medicine important? Evid Based Med 2006; 11(5): 133-5.‎
  • ‎4. Aydın E, Ersoy N. Clinical-Ethical Decision-Making Process. T Klin J Med Ethics 1995; 3(1): 12-6. ‎
  • ‎5. Peerson A, Saunders M. Health literacy revisited: what do we mean and why does it matter? Health Promot Int 2009; ‎‎24(3): 285-96.‎
  • ‎6. Şahiner A, Ak R, Aygün K, Turan C, Cimilli Öztürk T, Yurdakul ES, et al. Analysis of White Codes due to Violence in ‎Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital. Bosphorus Med J 2018; 5(1): 11-6. ‎
  • ‎7. Akdeniz M, Kavukçu E. Quaternary prevention: First, do not harm. Turkish Journal of Family Practice 2017; 21(2): 74-‎‎81. ‎
  • ‎8. İlhan M, Aydemir Ö, Çakır M, Aycan S. A study in three districts of Ankara of behaviors associated with irrational use ‎of drugs. Turk J Public Health 2014; 12(3): 188-200. ‎
  • ‎9. Ilhan MN, Durukan E, Ilhan SO, Aksakal FN, Ozkan S, Bumin MA. Self-medication with antibiotics: questionnaire ‎survey among primary care center attendants. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2009; 18(12): 1150-7.‎
  • ‎10. Bolat A, Arslan M, Balamtekin N, Zeybek C, Aydoğmuş YH, Ünay B. Current Epidemiological Data on Community ‎Acquired Pneumonia in Children After Improvements in the Health System and Socioeconomic Changes in Turkiye. J Mol ‎Virol Immunol 2022; 3(3): 150-8.‎
  • ‎11. Gürsoy K. An Overview of Turkish Healthcare System after Health Transformation Program: Main Successes, ‎Performance Assessment, Further Challenges, and Policy Options. Sosyal Güvence 2015; 7: 83-112. ‎
  • ‎12. Khalifa M, Khalid P. Reducing Unnecessary Laboratory Testing Using Health Informatics Applications: A Case Study ‎on a Tertiary Care Hospital. Procedia Computer Science 2014; 37: 253-60. ‎
  • ‎13. Friedman M, Rosenman R (eds). Type a Behavior and Your Heart. 1974, Harper and Row, New York. ‎
  • ‎14. Weiss DJ, Dawis RV, England GW. Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in ‎Vocational Rehabilitation 1967; 22: 120.‎
  • ‎15. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983; 24(4): 385-‎‎96. ‎
  • ‎16. Eskin M, Harlak H, Demirkıran F, Dereboy C. The Adaptation of the Perceived Stress Scale Into Turkish: A Reliability ‎and Validity Analysis. New/Yeni Symposium Journal 2013; 51(3): 132-40. ‎
  • ‎17. Sahin NH, Durak A. Stresle basa cıkma tarzları ölceği: Universite ögrencileri icin uyarlanması. Turk Psikoloji Dergisi ‎‎1995; 10(34): 56-73. ‎
  • ‎18. Smith CM. Origin and uses of primum non nocere--above all, do no harm! J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 45(4): 371-7. ‎
  • ‎19. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Resmi Gazete. Devlet Memurları Kanunu 23/7/1965. Resmi Gazete. 1967: 4179–4290. Available ‎at: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.657.pdf [Accessed July 18, 2022]. ‎
  • ‎20. Sikaris KA. Enhancing the Clinical Value of Medical Laboratory Testing. Clin Biochem Rev 2017; 38(3): 107-14. ‎
  • ‎21. Hickner J, Graham DG, Elder NC, Brandt E, Emsermann CB, Dovey S, et al. Testing process errors and their harms ‎and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians ‎National Research Network. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; 17(3): 194-200. ‎
  • ‎22. Kocatürk E, Ağgül C, Alataş O. Investigation of Unnecessary Laboratory Testing by Using fPSA and Serum Lipids ‎Turk Klinik Biyokimya Derg 2015; 13(3): 101-6.‎
  • ‎23. Aksoy GA, Zeytinoğlu A. Evaluation of unnecessary test requests from clinical virology-serology laboratory. Ege ‎Journal of Medicine 2012; 51(3): 157-61. ‎
  • ‎24. Hofmann B. Medicalization and overdiagnosis: different but alike. Med Health Care Philos 2016; 19(2): 253-64. ‎
  • ‎25. Doğan E, Hıdıroğlu S, Karavuş M. A qualitative study to evaluate common problems of primary health care ‎physicians about patients. Jour Turk Fam Phy 2017; 8(1): 2-10. ‎
  • ‎26. Ishikawa H, Yano E, Fujimori S, Kinoshita M, Yamanouchi T, Yoshikawa M, et al. Patient health literacy and patient-‎physician information exchange during a visit. Fam Pract 2009; 26(6): 517-23. ‎
  • ‎27. Restuccia JD, Payne SM, Lenhart G, Constantine HP, Fulton JP. Assessing the appropriateness of hospital utilization to ‎improve efficiency and competitive position. Health Care Manage Rev 1987; 12(3): 17-27. ‎
  • ‎28. Wagner H. Quaternary Prevention and the Challenges to Develop a Good Practice Comment on "Quaternary ‎Prevention, an Answer of Family Doctors to Overmedicalization". Int J Health Policy Manag 2015; 4(8): 557-8. ‎
  • ‎29. Jones CJ, Smith H, Llewellyn C. Evaluating the effectiveness of health belief model interventions in improving ‎adherence: a systematic review. Health Psychol Rev 2014; 8(3): 253-69. ‎
  • ‎30. Whiting P, Toerien M, de Salis I, Sterne JA, Dieppe P, Egger M, Fahey T. A review identifies and classifies reasons ‎for ordering diagnostic tests. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60(10): 981-9. ‎
  • ‎31. Kc D, Terwiesch C. Impact of Workload on Service Time and Patient Safety: An Econometric Analysis of Hospital ‎Operations. Management Science 2009; 55(9): 1486-98. ‎
  • ‎32. Shye D, Freeborn DK, Romeo J, Eraker S. Understanding physicians' imaging test use in low back pain care: the role ‎of focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 1998; 10(2): 83-91. ‎
  • ‎33. Finset A. "I am worried, Doctor!" Emotions in the doctor-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns 2012; 88(3): 359-‎‎63. ‎
  • ‎34. Ozyurt A, Hayran O, Sur H. Predictors of burnout and job satisfaction among Turkish physicians. QJM 2006; 99(3): ‎‎161-9. ‎
  • ‎35. Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, Dyrbye LN, Sotile W, Satele D, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance ‎among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172(18): 1377-85. ‎
  • ‎36. Pulcrano M, Evans SR, Sosin M. Quality of Life and Burnout Rates Across Surgical Specialties: A Systematic Review. ‎JAMA Surg 2016; 151(10): 970-8. ‎