Published December 17, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

On Monoculturalism Issue in Music

  • 1. Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, Kyiv, Ukraine

Description

The purpose of the article is to analyse the context of the use of the term monoculturalism in music, determine the features of the relation with the concept of multiculturalism, outline the prospects for their application. Research methodology. Analytical and comparative methods are to analyse the context of the application of the term monoculturalism in cultural and music literature and compare the meanings in the interpretation by different researchers. The scientific novelty of the study is the definition of criteria for applying the concepts of monoculture (monoculturalism) and multiculture (multiculturalism) in music background discourse. Conclusions. During the study, it has been revealed that in music art, the term monoculture is understood by the authors in different ways — in the sense of focusing on the traditions of certain national communities (with the restriction of interethnic influences) or on the conventions of individual social communities (with the restriction of national identity), the examples of which are the Soviet socialist realistic doctrine (CPSU officials introduced the restrictions) or contemporary mass art (the restrictions due to the laws of the market economy). The use of the term monoculture in works that are performed within the framework of the Kovcheh Ukraina Art Project, in particular, folk songs in authentic-sounding and modern arrangements, symphonic works by D. Bortniansky, M. Lysenko, B. Liatoshynsky, M. Skoryk, etc. has been analysed in detail by critics of The Claquers publication. It has been proved that the term monoculture is used uncritically in a negative emotional colour by the authors, the sources of which come from certain areas of sociology and agronomy, which forms a basis for discrimination and stigmatisation of creative initiatives aimed at maintenance and development of original national art. It has been noted that the ambiguity and instability of the term monoculture in music art is a prerequisite for its uncritical, politically motivated use. At the same time, the opposite concept is multiculturalism, ambiguously assessed by culturologists, can be used in music art.

Files

On_Monoculturalism_Issue_in_Music.pdf

Files (503.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:cdd32ea61623df027eb3b99613ea8e02
503.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Drozhzhyna, S. (2008). Multykulturalizm: Teoretychni i Praktychni Aspekty [Multiculturalism: Theoretical and Practical Aspects]. Politychnyi Menedzhment [Political Management], 3(30), 96-106 [in Ukrainian].
  • Hrytsenko, O. (2019). Kulturnyi Prostir i Natsionalna Kultura: Teoretychne Osmyslennia ta Praktychne Formuvannia [Cultural Space and National Culture: Theoretical Understanding and Practical Formation]. Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilisations and the Remaking of World Order. Simon & Schuster.
  • Kolodii, A. (2008). Amerykanska Doktryna Multykulturalizmu i Etnonatsionalnyi Rozvytok Ukrainy [American Doctrine of Multiculturalism and Ethno-National Development of Ukraine]. Ahora, 6, 5-14 [in Ukrainian].
  • Kozarenko, O. (2000). Fenomen Ukrainskoi Natsionalnoi Muzychnoi Movy [The Phenomenon of the Ukrainian National Musical Language]. Shevchenko Scientific Society [in Ukrainian].
  • Liashenko, I. F. (1991). Natsionalne ta Internatsionalne v Muzytsi [National and International in Music]. Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
  • Liudkevych, S. (1999.). Doslidzhennia, Statti, Retsenzii, Vystupy [Research, Articles, Reviews, Speeches] (Vol. 1). I. Krypyakevych Institute of Ukrainian Studies of the NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
  • Oxford University Press. (2021). Monoculturalism. In Lexico.com. Retrieved October 30, 2021, from https://www.lexico.com/definition/monoculturalism
  • Rozumeiko, I., & Sirenko, L. (2021, September 1). Kovcheh "Ukraina" – Korabletroshcha Natsionalnoho Kulturnoho Kodu [Kovcheh "Ukraine" – a Shipwreck of the National Cultural Code]. The Claquers. https://theclaquers.com/posts/7359 [in Ukrainian].
  • Savchuk, I. (2016). Borys Liatoshynskyi i Polska Kultura: Typolohichni Osoblyvosti [Borys Liatoshynsky and Polish Culture: Typological Features]. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoi Muzychnoi Akademii Ukrainy imeni P. I. Chaikovskoho [Scientific Herald of Tchaikovsky National Academy of Music of Ukraine], 114, 16-49 [in Ukrainian].
  • Shils, E. (1997). Natsiia, Natsionalnist, Natsionalizm i Hromadianske Suspilstvo [Nation, Nationality, Nationalism and Civil Society] (V. Yeshkiliev, Trans.). In E. Shils, The Virtue of Civility: Selected Essays on Liberalism, Tradition, and Civil Society (pp. 188-224). Liberty Fund. http://www.ji.lviv.ua/n21texts/shilz.htm [in Ukrainian].
  • Tsekhmistro, O. V. (2012). Kulturno-Istorychni Peredumovy Rozvytku Ukrainskoi Vokalno-Symfonichnoi Muzyky Ostannoi Tretyny XX st. [Cultural and Historical Preconditions for the Development of Ukrainian Vocal and Symphonic Music of the Last Third of the 20th Century]. Kultura Ukrainy [Culture of Ukraine], 37, 224-232 [in Ukrainian].
  • Usatenko, T. (2011). Identychnist v Konteksti Mystetskoi Osvity [An Identity in the Context of Artistic Education]. Estetyka i Etyka Pedahohichnoi Dii [Aesthetics and Ethics of Pedagogical Action], 1, 137-148 [in Ukrainian].
  • Zharinov, V. I., & Dovhan S. V. (2008). Ahroekolohiia: Terminolohichnyi ta Dovidkovyi Material [Agroecology: Terminological and Reference Material]. Nova knyha [in Ukrainian].