Other Open Access

Triggers for better science: there is no place for maternal deprivation in ethical scientific practice

Gal Badihi; Catherine Hobaiter

This letter was submitted to PNAS as a Letter to the Editor on behalf of the 260 co-authors working in the field of animal behaviour and welfare, in response to their publication of the article by Margaret S. Livingstone: “Triggers for Mother Love” (1), published in PNAS on September 19th 2022. They declined to publish it. We store it here to maintain a public record of our response and the strength of collective feeling in our field that journals today have a responsibility to address unethical practices, such as mother-infant separation, to recognise the poor quality of research standards they promote, as well as their failure to advance scientific knowledge.

Files (32.8 kB)
Name Size
Group Author details_Rv copy.csv
md5:f10855977f38ecf6b8e377172d7f1bae
11.7 kB Download
PNAS_responseOct2022_Rv.docx
md5:cf5058e357381e0a3e75d114d5ebc1d1
21.1 kB Download
804
511
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 804804
Downloads 511511
Data volume 6.9 MB6.9 MB
Unique views 695695
Unique downloads 390390

Share

Cite as